Today's most viewed
Bromby best against Potters
 |
| Leigh Bromby. Picture: JANE PARR |
Leigh Bromby was your star performer in Watford's goalless draw with Stoke City on Saturday.
The centre-half polled an impressive 8.6 in the Watford Observer's online match ratings to emerge ahead of fellow defenders of Dan Shittu (8.3) and Jay DeMerit (8).
12:56pm Tuesday 18th March 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: henry, oxhey on 2:54pm Tue 18 Mar 08
The whole team showed plenty of skill,no-how and resolve.
Anyone else fed up with the snide propaganda from other clubs about our so called bullying tactics?
The latest whiner is the B City chairman, the implication being that they somehow play 'pure' football and we're just a dirty team of strong arm merchants.
I think that Aidy should take these guys on. If you look at the official websites B.C. have 60 yellow and 3 red cards this season. Watford have 62 and 2.
Moreover B.C. have a plus goal difference of 2 - hardly the credentials of a team suited to life in the Premiership.
The whole team showed plenty of skill,no-how and resolve.
Anyone else fed up with the snide propaganda from other clubs about our so called bullying tactics?
The latest whiner is the B City chairman, the implication being that they somehow play 'pure' football and we're just a dirty team of strong arm merchants.
I think that Aidy should take these guys on. If you look at the official websites B.C. have 60 yellow and 3 red cards this season. Watford have 62 and 2.
Moreover B.C. have a plus goal difference of 2 - hardly the credentials of a team suited to life in the Premiership.
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 3:59pm Tue 18 Mar 08
Love to see the purist football teams like BC, WBA, Ipswich all plying their trade in the Championship again next year.... that Will tell you a lot!
Love to see the purist football teams like BC, WBA, Ipswich all plying their trade in the Championship again next year.... that Will tell you a lot!
Posted by: sage, mids on 4:21pm Tue 18 Mar 08
That is why stoke fans call wba West Brazil albion as they are sick of hearing about pure football.
Whilst we do not play enough football I still think that it will be;
1 Stoke
2 Us
3 WBA
4 B City
provided that we can actually win home games v bottom teams.
WBA 2 games in hand are away where their record is very poor.
Also all 4 -not just us- are doing badly over last 5 games.
That is why stoke fans call wba West Brazil albion as they are sick of hearing about pure football.
Whilst we do not play enough football I still think that it will be;
1 Stoke
2 Us
3 WBA
4 B City
provided that we can actually win home games v bottom teams.
WBA 2 games in hand are away where their record is very poor.
Also all 4 -not just us- are doing badly over last 5 games.
Posted by: chris, the vic on 6:02pm Tue 18 Mar 08
Interesting three highest markings go to defenders!
Tend to think you may be right in your predictions sage..similar to mine but i had allowed for us to win last saturday and lose at Hull...now I am hoping for draws at Plymouth and at Hull.
But as you say we need to win home games. Unbelievable the way we all had a reasonable run followed again by a poor points gathering run...whoever hits a decent run will go up...we seem to be playing better but with few points to prove it.
Interesting three highest markings go to defenders!
Tend to think you may be right in your predictions sage..similar to mine but i had allowed for us to win last saturday and lose at Hull...now I am hoping for draws at Plymouth and at Hull.
But as you say we need to win home games. Unbelievable the way we all had a reasonable run followed again by a poor points gathering run...whoever hits a decent run will go up...we seem to be playing better but with few points to prove it.
Posted by: sage, mids on 6:48pm Tue 18 Mar 08
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
Posted by: ozzy, kingcross on 8:44pm Tue 18 Mar 08
surely with yure mony you can go on holiday.
surely with yure mony you can go on holiday.
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 9:36pm Tue 18 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
[/quote] To comment in the style on sage.......
I strongly disagree re-b0llocks of postre, look at the sequence u tool- -JJ is not the player u think he is, he's no rooney and def not finished article, yes he has strength re long hair.
U know i'm right coz i am never wrong re--everything. look at sequence will tell u I have lots of money and live in a mansion, and if anyone disagrees I will reply vehemently again and again, got that vor, jboy, ozz, colin ,prof
sage wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
To comment in the style on sage.......
I strongly disagree re-b0llocks of postre, look at the sequence u tool- -JJ is not the player u think he is, he's no rooney and def not finished article, yes he has strength re long hair.
U know i'm right coz i am never wrong re--everything. look at sequence will tell u I have lots of money and live in a mansion, and if anyone disagrees I will reply vehemently again and again, got that vor, jboy, ozz, colin ,prof
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:09pm Tue 18 Mar 08
what a waste of time you are! Silly little childish tossa with no insight to offer just antagonistic postings constantly.
Your life must be very empty if you take pleasure in this stuff rather than attempting anything rational.
I suspect that your only sexual experiences were curtailed once caller I D was introduced to the phone system & CCTV reduced your opportunities to snatch underwear from washing lines.
Then again you gypos dont wash much so its probably a stolen car ride to find your nearest source of gratification.
NeNever done anything-never been anywhere-never will--only complete failures behave as you do.
TWATT!
what a waste of time you are! Silly little childish tossa with no insight to offer just antagonistic postings constantly.
Your life must be very empty if you take pleasure in this stuff rather than attempting anything rational.
I suspect that your only sexual experiences were curtailed once caller I D was introduced to the phone system & CCTV reduced your opportunities to snatch underwear from washing lines.
Then again you gypos dont wash much so its probably a stolen car ride to find your nearest source of gratification.
NeNever done anything-never been anywhere-never will--only complete failures behave as you do.
TWATT!
Posted by: neville on 9:14am Wed 19 Mar 08
What about Hull? It is a five horse race, not just the four mentioned above.
They have only lost two out of their last 12, and at difficult venues like Bristol City and Cardiff!
Of the other ten, they have WON seven! They seem to be the only top team turning draws into victories!
They are also scoring lots of goals now, and their goal difference is improving with every game.
They also have a comparatively easy run-in, so watch out for Hull and dismiss them at your peril.
It makes our game there in two weeks even more vital.
What about Hull? It is a five horse race, not just the four mentioned above.
They have only lost two out of their last 12, and at difficult venues like Bristol City and Cardiff!
Of the other ten, they have WON seven! They seem to be the only top team turning draws into victories!
They are also scoring lots of goals now, and their goal difference is improving with every game.
They also have a comparatively easy run-in, so watch out for Hull and dismiss them at your peril.
It makes our game there in two weeks even more vital.
Posted by: nathan ellington, Watford on 1:53pm Wed 19 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
what a waste of time you are! Silly little childish tossa with no insight to offer just antagonistic postings constantly.
Your life must be very empty if you take pleasure in this stuff rather than attempting anything rational.
I suspect that your only sexual experiences were curtailed once caller I D was introduced to the phone system & CCTV reduced your opportunities to snatch underwear from washing lines.
Then again you gypos dont wash much so its probably a stolen car ride to find your nearest source of gratification.
NeNever done anything-never been anywhere-never will--only complete failures behave as you do.
TWATT!
[/quote] He doth protest too much methinks. He doth talk too much methinks.
sage wrote:
what a waste of time you are! Silly little childish tossa with no insight to offer just antagonistic postings constantly.
Your life must be very empty if you take pleasure in this stuff rather than attempting anything rational.
I suspect that your only sexual experiences were curtailed once caller I D was introduced to the phone system & CCTV reduced your opportunities to snatch underwear from washing lines.
Then again you gypos dont wash much so its probably a stolen car ride to find your nearest source of gratification.
NeNever done anything-never been anywhere-never will--only complete failures behave as you do.
TWATT!
He doth protest too much methinks. He doth talk too much methinks.
Posted by: ozzy, kingcross on 6:22pm Wed 19 Mar 08
[quote][bold]VoR[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
[/quote] To comment in the style on sage.......
I strongly disagree re-b0llocks of postre, look at the sequence u tool- -JJ is not the player u think he is, he's no rooney and def not finished article, yes he has strength re long hair.
U know i'm right coz i am never wrong re--everything. look at sequence will tell u I have lots of money and live in a mansion, and if anyone disagrees I will reply vehemently again and again, got that vor, jboy, ozz, colin ,prof [/quote] hehehehehheh, very funny , nice on mr vor.
VoR wrote:
sage wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
To comment in the style on sage.......
I strongly disagree re-b0llocks of postre, look at the sequence u tool- -JJ is not the player u think he is, he's no rooney and def not finished article, yes he has strength re long hair.
U know i'm right coz i am never wrong re--everything. look at sequence will tell u I have lots of money and live in a mansion, and if anyone disagrees I will reply vehemently again and again, got that vor, jboy, ozz, colin ,prof
hehehehehheh, very funny , nice on mr vor.
Posted by: ozzy, kingcross on 6:23pm Wed 19 Mar 08
[quote][bold]VoR[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
[/quote] To comment in the style on sage.......
I strongly disagree re-b0llocks of postre, look at the sequence u tool- -JJ is not the player u think he is, he's no rooney and def not finished article, yes he has strength re long hair.
U know i'm right coz i am never wrong re--everything. look at sequence will tell u I have lots of money and live in a mansion, and if anyone disagrees I will reply vehemently again and again, got that vor, jboy, ozz, colin ,prof [/quote] hehehehehheh, very funny , nice on mr vor.
VoR wrote:
sage wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas
sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
To comment in the style on sage.......
I strongly disagree re-b0llocks of postre, look at the sequence u tool- -JJ is not the player u think he is, he's no rooney and def not finished article, yes he has strength re long hair.
U know i'm right coz i am never wrong re--everything. look at sequence will tell u I have lots of money and live in a mansion, and if anyone disagrees I will reply vehemently again and again, got that vor, jboy, ozz, colin ,prof
hehehehehheh, very funny , nice on mr vor.
Posted by: sage, mids on 6:24pm Wed 19 Mar 08
[quote][bold]nathan ellington[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote: what a waste of time you are! Silly little childish tossa with no insight to offer just antagonistic postings constantly. Your life must be very empty if you take pleasure in this stuff rather than attempting anything rational. I suspect that your only sexual experiences were curtailed once caller I D was introduced to the phone system & CCTV reduced your opportunities to snatch underwear from washing lines. Then again you gypos dont wash much so its probably a stolen car ride to find your nearest source of gratification. NeNever done anything-never been anywhere-never will--only complete failures behave as you do. TWATT! [/quote] He doth protest too much methinks. He doth talk too much methinks.[/quote] Second dumb post from VOR `s altar ego--already gave yourself away on previous posting--nothing about foot ball then?
nathan ellington wrote:
sage wrote: what a waste of time you are! Silly little childish tossa with no insight to offer just antagonistic postings constantly. Your life must be very empty if you take pleasure in this stuff rather than attempting anything rational. I suspect that your only sexual experiences were curtailed once caller I D was introduced to the phone system & CCTV reduced your opportunities to snatch underwear from washing lines. Then again you gypos dont wash much so its probably a stolen car ride to find your nearest source of gratification. NeNever done anything-never been anywhere-never will--only complete failures behave as you do. TWATT!
He doth protest too much methinks. He doth talk too much methinks.
Second dumb post from VOR `s altar ego--already gave yourself away on previous posting--nothing about foot ball then?
Posted by: EXEMPLAR, The Pub on 6:42pm Wed 19 Mar 08
I hesitate to intrude in a circular private fight but does this forum have any value with this continually pointless,infantile & irrelevant rubbish?
Whilst Chris The Vic,Tiger Bay Boy,Roger,Sage,Hexha
m Hornet and a couple of others, tend to see some things the same as me and each other,they also disagree without rancour.
Sage for example gave reasons why Williamson is not the answer "ball watching" & chris the Vic & Hexham point out Hendersons goal threat or lack of with some stats.
There have been counter arguments put and accepted/rejected--p
ersonally I disagree about Henderson faults and I am a "Half full" Darius fan believing that in our systenm he does very well & that In Ellington (the player not the half wit using his name on this site) we have been "conned" by WBA.
However I enjoy the debate, all the people mentioned at least are grown up enough to argue reasonably,which brings me to my main point,which is
why do Vor & OZ bother at all?
Have you ever seen such drivel?
Have they ever posted a well thought out contribution?
grow up & go way please before the better posters give up in disgust.
I hesitate to intrude in a circular private fight but does this forum have any value with this continually pointless,infantile & irrelevant rubbish?
Whilst Chris The Vic,Tiger Bay Boy,Roger,Sage,Hexha
m Hornet and a couple of others, tend to see some things the same as me and each other,they also disagree without rancour.
Sage for example gave reasons why Williamson is not the answer "ball watching" & chris the Vic & Hexham point out Hendersons goal threat or lack of with some stats.
There have been counter arguments put and accepted/rejected--p
ersonally I disagree about Henderson faults and I am a "Half full" Darius fan believing that in our systenm he does very well & that In Ellington (the player not the half wit using his name on this site) we have been "conned" by WBA.
However I enjoy the debate, all the people mentioned at least are grown up enough to argue reasonably,which brings me to my main point,which is
why do Vor & OZ bother at all?
Have you ever seen such drivel?
Have they ever posted a well thought out contribution?
grow up & go way please before the better posters give up in disgust.
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 8:18pm Wed 19 Mar 08
My prediction.....
Watford and Stoke automatic, Hull be promoted via playoff if not automatic, there is always one that comes up with a really strong finish and they are doing just that! WBA cup exploits will be the undoing of them! (GOOD)
Glad to see Ashley Youngs younger brother given a contract, he always said that his brothers were potentially better than him, if they are then that would be a real plus, pleased about Liam Henderson aswell....Henderson & Henderson up front!!!
My prediction.....
Watford and Stoke automatic, Hull be promoted via playoff if not automatic, there is always one that comes up with a really strong finish and they are doing just that! WBA cup exploits will be the undoing of them! (GOOD)
Glad to see Ashley Youngs younger brother given a contract, he always said that his brothers were potentially better than him, if they are then that would be a real plus, pleased about Liam Henderson aswell....Henderson & Henderson up front!!!
Posted by: tiger bay boy, mill end on 9:10pm Wed 19 Mar 08
not sure where you're all coming from with the 'Stoke for promotion' angle. Without Liam Lawrence they are very one dimensional and were outplayed by the 10 men. Hull will probably now find that getting there is the easy bit, other teams will now see them as a scalp. did you notice how good Watford looked when we actually got the ball down and knocked it about in short spells saturday, surely the way forward Aidy. The mix of long and short football in that 10 minute spell was as good as anything you will see in this division. Long may it continue. Plymouth away? another stalemate im afraid.
not sure where you're all coming from with the 'Stoke for promotion' angle. Without Liam Lawrence they are very one dimensional and were outplayed by the 10 men. Hull will probably now find that getting there is the easy bit, other teams will now see them as a scalp. did you notice how good Watford looked when we actually got the ball down and knocked it about in short spells saturday, surely the way forward Aidy. The mix of long and short football in that 10 minute spell was as good as anything you will see in this division. Long may it continue. Plymouth away? another stalemate im afraid.
Posted by: ozzy, kingcross on 9:19pm Wed 19 Mar 08
[quote][bold]EXEMPLAR[/bold] wrote:
I hesitate to intrude in a circular private fight but does this forum have any value with this continually pointless,infantile & irrelevant rubbish?
Whilst Chris The Vic,Tiger Bay Boy,Roger,Sage,Hexha
m Hornet and a couple of others, tend to see some things the same as me and each other,they also disagree without rancour.
Sage for example gave reasons why Williamson is not the answer "ball watching" & chris the Vic & Hexham point out Hendersons goal threat or lack of with some stats.
There have been counter arguments put and accepted/rejected--p
ersonally I disagree about Henderson faults and I am a "Half full" Darius fan believing that in our systenm he does very well & that In Ellington (the player not the half wit using his name on this site) we have been "conned" by WBA.
However I enjoy the debate, all the people mentioned at least are grown up enough to argue reasonably,which brings me to my main point,which is
why do Vor & OZ bother at all?
Have you ever seen such drivel?
Have they ever posted a well thought out contribution?
grow up & go way please before the better posters give up in disgust.[/quote] so whi yu bother at all, meet me down moon undre water then pub boy
EXEMPLAR wrote:
I hesitate to intrude in a circular private fight but does this forum have any value with this continually pointless,infantile & irrelevant rubbish?
Whilst Chris The Vic,Tiger Bay Boy,Roger,Sage,Hexha
m Hornet and a couple of others, tend to see some things the same as me and each other,they also disagree without rancour.
Sage for example gave reasons why Williamson is not the answer "ball watching" & chris the Vic & Hexham point out Hendersons goal threat or lack of with some stats.
There have been counter arguments put and accepted/rejected--p
ersonally I disagree about Henderson faults and I am a "Half full" Darius fan believing that in our systenm he does very well & that In Ellington (the player not the half wit using his name on this site) we have been "conned" by WBA.
However I enjoy the debate, all the people mentioned at least are grown up enough to argue reasonably,which brings me to my main point,which is
why do Vor & OZ bother at all?
Have you ever seen such drivel?
Have they ever posted a well thought out contribution?
grow up & go way please before the better posters give up in disgust.
so whi yu bother at all, meet me down moon undre water then pub boy
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:21pm Wed 19 Mar 08
Oztwat a couple of points:
1. I think you have made EXEMPLARS point somewhat don`t you?
2. Why do you keep trying to entice men to your gay bar? many of us like women. Just `cos VOR has become your b***h do not think that you are irrestible!
Enuff of dealing with morons!
TBB, stoke run in is better & that is why I predict them & us--Hull will not do it I feel.
Oztwat a couple of points:
1. I think you have made EXEMPLARS point somewhat don`t you?
2. Why do you keep trying to entice men to your gay bar? many of us like women. Just `cos VOR has become your b***h do not think that you are irrestible!
Enuff of dealing with morons!
TBB, stoke run in is better & that is why I predict them & us--Hull will not do it I feel.
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:21pm Wed 19 Mar 08
Oztwat a couple of points:
1. I think you have made EXEMPLARS point somewhat don`t you?
2. Why do you keep trying to entice men to your gay bar? many of us like women. Just `cos VOR has become your b***h do not think that you are irrestible!
Enuff of dealing with morons!
TBB, stoke run in is better & that is why I predict them & us--Hull will not do it I feel.
Oztwat a couple of points:
1. I think you have made EXEMPLARS point somewhat don`t you?
2. Why do you keep trying to entice men to your gay bar? many of us like women. Just `cos VOR has become your b***h do not think that you are irrestible!
Enuff of dealing with morons!
TBB, stoke run in is better & that is why I predict them & us--Hull will not do it I feel.
Posted by: Scotshorn, Aberdeen on 8:07am Thu 20 Mar 08
[quote][bold]VoR[/bold] wrote:
My prediction..... Watford and Stoke automatic, Hull be promoted via playoff if not automatic, there is always one that comes up with a really strong finish and they are doing just that! WBA cup exploits will be the undoing of them! (GOOD) Glad to see Ashley Youngs younger brother given a contract, he always said that his brothers were potentially better than him, if they are then that would be a real plus, pleased about Liam Henderson aswell....Henderson & Henderson up front!!! [/quote] ..... and if Ashley hadn't left, we could play 4-2-4 with a front four of Young Henderson Young Henderson
VoR wrote:
My prediction..... Watford and Stoke automatic, Hull be promoted via playoff if not automatic, there is always one that comes up with a really strong finish and they are doing just that! WBA cup exploits will be the undoing of them! (GOOD) Glad to see Ashley Youngs younger brother given a contract, he always said that his brothers were potentially better than him, if they are then that would be a real plus, pleased about Liam Henderson aswell....Henderson & Henderson up front!!!
..... and if Ashley hadn't left, we could play 4-2-4 with a front four of Young Henderson Young Henderson
Posted by: neville on 9:14am Thu 20 Mar 08
Great post by EXEMPLAR. This site should be for WFC and football related issues.
Glad to see VOR has responded with a decent post this time. Keep it up VOR, and forget the Sage baiting. He is a fan and deserves better.
As for Hull again, dismiss them at your peril. Their run-in is Leicester (A), Watford (H), QPR (H), Barnsley (A), Sheff Utd (A), Palace (H), Ipswich (A).
Not a bad set of fixtures! Although I would not fancy going to Ipswich on the last day of the season if promotion depended on it.
We should still be okay for automatic, but it really does depend on us taking max points from our home games. They look comfortable on paper, but the reality is often very different.
Great post by EXEMPLAR. This site should be for WFC and football related issues.
Glad to see VOR has responded with a decent post this time. Keep it up VOR, and forget the Sage baiting. He is a fan and deserves better.
As for Hull again, dismiss them at your peril. Their run-in is Leicester (A), Watford (H), QPR (H), Barnsley (A), Sheff Utd (A), Palace (H), Ipswich (A).
Not a bad set of fixtures! Although I would not fancy going to Ipswich on the last day of the season if promotion depended on it.
We should still be okay for automatic, but it really does depend on us taking max points from our home games. They look comfortable on paper, but the reality is often very different.
Posted by: Professor Plum, The Billiard Room on 9:31am Thu 20 Mar 08
Over the past few days Sage’s ‘well though out counter arguments’ have included the following:
“my bet is you are more a receiver than a giver”
“Arse!”
“questioning my secretary about her underware” (sic)
“bad times in the showers @ borstal”
“did they really make you dress as little bo-peep?”
“5 of them used both orifices”
“was that you, johnboy & Vor taking turns on each other?”
“TWATT!”
“arse hunted by a pervo”
“DROP DEAD U NONCE!”
“that`s what you said whilst bending over”
“snatch underwear from washing lines”
Personally, I find the ‘pointless, infantile & irrelevant rubbish’ quite entertaining – just my opinion and I look forward to reading lots of ‘well thought out counter arguments’ in response.
Over the past few days Sage’s ‘well though out counter arguments’ have included the following:
“my bet is you are more a receiver than a giver”
“Arse!”
“questioning my secretary about her underware” (sic)
“bad times in the showers @ borstal”
“did they really make you dress as little bo-peep?”
“5 of them used both orifices”
“was that you, johnboy & Vor taking turns on each other?”
“TWATT!”
“arse hunted by a pervo”
“DROP DEAD U NONCE!”
“that`s what you said whilst bending over”
“snatch underwear from washing lines”
Personally, I find the ‘pointless, infantile & irrelevant rubbish’ quite entertaining – just my opinion and I look forward to reading lots of ‘well thought out counter arguments’ in response.
Posted by: JohnBoy, Watford on 2:46pm Thu 20 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Professor Plum[/bold] wrote:
Over the past few days Sage’s ‘well though out counter arguments’ have included the following: “my bet is you are more a receiver than a giver” “Arse!” “questioning my secretary about her underware” (sic) “bad times in the showers @ borstal” “did they really make you dress as little bo-peep?” “5 of them used both orifices” “was that you, johnboy & Vor taking turns on each other?” “TWATT!” “arse hunted by a pervo” “DROP DEAD U NONCE!” “that`s what you said whilst bending over” “snatch underwear from washing lines” Personally, I find the ‘pointless, infantile & irrelevant rubbish’ quite entertaining – just my opinion and I look forward to reading lots of ‘well thought out counter arguments’ in response. [/quote] Well researched Prof. Still Neville and 'Exemplar' thinks he is worthy of merit despite the quotes you showed. No doubt Sage will give the schoolboy answer 'well they were nasty to me so i was nasty back'
For some reason these people are sycophants for this egotist excuse for a human being.
Back to the posting though. LB was outstanding against Stoke , closely followed by JJOT and TS.
I believe Stoke have an easier finish that us , WBA and BC. I fancy them and us to go up.
Professor Plum wrote:
Over the past few days Sage’s ‘well though out counter arguments’ have included the following: “my bet is you are more a receiver than a giver” “Arse!” “questioning my secretary about her underware” (sic) “bad times in the showers @ borstal” “did they really make you dress as little bo-peep?” “5 of them used both orifices” “was that you, johnboy & Vor taking turns on each other?” “TWATT!” “arse hunted by a pervo” “DROP DEAD U NONCE!” “that`s what you said whilst bending over” “snatch underwear from washing lines” Personally, I find the ‘pointless, infantile & irrelevant rubbish’ quite entertaining – just my opinion and I look forward to reading lots of ‘well thought out counter arguments’ in response.
Well researched Prof. Still Neville and 'Exemplar' thinks he is worthy of merit despite the quotes you showed. No doubt Sage will give the schoolboy answer 'well they were nasty to me so i was nasty back'
For some reason these people are sycophants for this egotist excuse for a human being.
Back to the posting though. LB was outstanding against Stoke , closely followed by JJOT and TS.
I believe Stoke have an easier finish that us , WBA and BC. I fancy them and us to go up.
Posted by: EXEMPLAR, The Pub on 6:40pm Thu 20 Mar 08
[quote][bold]JohnBoy[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Professor Plum[/bold] wrote: Over the past few days Sage’s ‘well though out counter arguments’ have included the following: “my bet is you are more a receiver than a giver” “Arse!” “questioning my secretary about her underware” (sic) “bad times in the showers @ borstal” “did they really make you dress as little bo-peep?” “5 of them used both orifices” “was that you, johnboy & Vor taking turns on each other?” “TWATT!” “arse hunted by a pervo” “DROP DEAD U NONCE!” “that`s what you said whilst bending over” “snatch underwear from washing lines” Personally, I find the ‘pointless, infantile & irrelevant rubbish’ quite entertaining – just my opinion and I look forward to reading lots of ‘well thought out counter arguments’ in response. [/quote] Well researched Prof. Still Neville and 'Exemplar' thinks he is worthy of merit despite the quotes you showed. No doubt Sage will give the schoolboy answer 'well they were nasty to me so i was nasty back' For some reason these people are sycophants for this egotist excuse for a human being. Back to the posting though. LB was outstanding against Stoke , closely followed by JJOT and TS. I believe Stoke have an easier finish that us , WBA and BC. I fancy them and us to go up.[/quote] No dishonestly researched Prof & John boy!-I thought about including you pair in my post but wish I had now.
Selective quotes--and even then these seemed to be in response to attacks (inc from you 2)
I have to agree with sage that JB is too dumb to understand things and PP thinks he is too clever
just when VOR may be growing up you pair decide to take his nursery place....ridiculous dishonest fools!
JohnBoy wrote:
Professor Plum wrote: Over the past few days Sage’s ‘well though out counter arguments’ have included the following: “my bet is you are more a receiver than a giver” “Arse!” “questioning my secretary about her underware” (sic) “bad times in the showers @ borstal” “did they really make you dress as little bo-peep?” “5 of them used both orifices” “was that you, johnboy & Vor taking turns on each other?” “TWATT!” “arse hunted by a pervo” “DROP DEAD U NONCE!” “that`s what you said whilst bending over” “snatch underwear from washing lines” Personally, I find the ‘pointless, infantile & irrelevant rubbish’ quite entertaining – just my opinion and I look forward to reading lots of ‘well thought out counter arguments’ in response.
Well researched Prof. Still Neville and 'Exemplar' thinks he is worthy of merit despite the quotes you showed. No doubt Sage will give the schoolboy answer 'well they were nasty to me so i was nasty back' For some reason these people are sycophants for this egotist excuse for a human being. Back to the posting though. LB was outstanding against Stoke , closely followed by JJOT and TS. I believe Stoke have an easier finish that us , WBA and BC. I fancy them and us to go up.
No dishonestly researched Prof & John boy!-I thought about including you pair in my post but wish I had now.
Selective quotes--and even then these seemed to be in response to attacks (inc from you 2)
I have to agree with sage that JB is too dumb to understand things and PP thinks he is too clever
just when VOR may be growing up you pair decide to take his nursery place....ridiculous dishonest fools!
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 6:56pm Thu 20 Mar 08
Here, Here..EXEMPLAR
Posted by: sage, mids on 7:30pm Thu 20 Mar 08
Little Bo peep has lost her sheep
And doesn't know where to find them.
Leave them alone and they'll come home,
Bringing their tails behind them.
Little Bo peep has lost her sheep
And doesn't know where to find them.
Leave them alone and they'll come home,
Bringing their tails behind them.
Posted by: sage, mids on 7:50pm Thu 20 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
Little Bo peep has lost her sheep And doesn't know where to find them. Leave them alone and they'll come home, Bringing their tails behind them.[/quote] MORONICF IMPOSTER!
-just think this knob must have to run from one internet cafe to another to keep posting as others--what an exciting life!
just when one hopes for sanity up pop prof Prat & his faithful arsslicker!
anyone with half a brain ( sorry to exclude you on those grounds Jboy but them`s the breaks thicko) would see that I have agreed with a couple of prof pedantics posts & even taken the penalty stuff in good part--but he thrives on discord & dishonesty so he produces EFFECT but omits CAUSE.
Oxtwat awaits you @ his gay bar prof so go there -in fact go anywhere but just GO!
sage wrote:
Little Bo peep has lost her sheep And doesn't know where to find them. Leave them alone and they'll come home, Bringing their tails behind them.
MORONICF IMPOSTER!
-just think this knob must have to run from one internet cafe to another to keep posting as others--what an exciting life!
just when one hopes for sanity up pop prof Prat & his faithful arsslicker!
anyone with half a brain ( sorry to exclude you on those grounds Jboy but them`s the breaks thicko) would see that I have agreed with a couple of prof pedantics posts & even taken the penalty stuff in good part--but he thrives on discord & dishonesty so he produces EFFECT but omits CAUSE.
Oxtwat awaits you @ his gay bar prof so go there -in fact go anywhere but just GO!
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 8:33pm Thu 20 Mar 08
Blah blah blah, go and take your family out for dinner!!
Blah blah blah, go and take your family out for dinner!!
Posted by: sage, mids on 9:37pm Thu 20 Mar 08
sorry for my earlier rant, my kids are delinquents and continually getting into trouble with the police and my wife won't have sex with me any more thats why i'm bitter and twisted and have to go on about everything i wished i had. there, i've said it now.
sorry for my earlier rant, my kids are delinquents and continually getting into trouble with the police and my wife won't have sex with me any more thats why i'm bitter and twisted and have to go on about everything i wished i had. there, i've said it now.
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 10:04pm Thu 20 Mar 08
No, No, No....
It's one thing baiting sage but no more of this imposter style posting, I do not agree with it, anything I want to say to him, I want him to know who it's from.
I find his behaviour quite amusing and makes me laugh, so enough! Lets start talking all that is WFC (& odd banter)
Please people!!!
No, No, No....
It's one thing baiting sage but no more of this imposter style posting, I do not agree with it, anything I want to say to him, I want him to know who it's from.
I find his behaviour quite amusing and makes me laugh, so enough! Lets start talking all that is WFC (& odd banter)
Please people!!!
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:06pm Thu 20 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
sorry for my earlier rant, my kids are delinquents and continually getting into trouble with the police and my wife won't have sex with me any more thats why i'm bitter and twisted and have to go on about everything i wished i had. there, i've said it now. [/quote] IMPOSTER! even dadder than oztwat!
sage wrote:
sorry for my earlier rant, my kids are delinquents and continually getting into trouble with the police and my wife won't have sex with me any more thats why i'm bitter and twisted and have to go on about everything i wished i had. there, i've said it now.
IMPOSTER! even dadder than oztwat!
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:06pm Thu 20 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
sorry for my earlier rant, my kids are delinquents and continually getting into trouble with the police and my wife won't have sex with me any more thats why i'm bitter and twisted and have to go on about everything i wished i had. there, i've said it now. [/quote] IMPOSTER! even dadder than oztwat!
sage wrote:
sorry for my earlier rant, my kids are delinquents and continually getting into trouble with the police and my wife won't have sex with me any more thats why i'm bitter and twisted and have to go on about everything i wished i had. there, i've said it now.
IMPOSTER! even dadder than oztwat!
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:08pm Thu 20 Mar 08
ERROR not sure if I meant SADDER or MADDER--actually both!
ERROR not sure if I meant SADDER or MADDER--actually both!
Posted by: sage, mids on 10:08pm Thu 20 Mar 08
ERROR not sure if I meant SADDER or MADDER--actually both!
ERROR not sure if I meant SADDER or MADDER--actually both!
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 10:22pm Thu 20 Mar 08
Sage.....
I fear you're getting flustered, go and have your pint of Adnams, it's only 3.7% which makes it ideal for both an afternoon drink aswell as a pre-bedtime one.
Sage.....
I fear you're getting flustered, go and have your pint of Adnams, it's only 3.7% which makes it ideal for both an afternoon drink aswell as a pre-bedtime one.
Posted by: sage, mids on 8:23am Fri 21 Mar 08
Now we have imposters adding to the krap--I give up
Now we have imposters adding to the krap--I give up
Posted by: sage, mids on 8:27am Fri 21 Mar 08
that previous postwas not me to wankas. ellithicko i suppose. midfield lacks creativitiy--LW lightweight--DH gives everything--taking family to mcdonalds for breakfast--vor has a small willy-this time i will only post this once--i usaully love the sound of my voice so much i post the same thing at least twice--oztwat see you in the moon
that previous postwas not me to wankas. ellithicko i suppose. midfield lacks creativitiy--LW lightweight--DH gives everything--taking family to mcdonalds for breakfast--vor has a small willy-this time i will only post this once--i usaully love the sound of my voice so much i post the same thing at least twice--oztwat see you in the moon
Posted by: EXEMPLAR, The Pub on 11:43am Fri 21 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
that previous postwas not me to wankas. ellithicko i suppose. midfield lacks creativitiy--LW lightweight--DH gives everything--taking family to mcdonalds for breakfast--vor has a small willy-this time i will only post this once--i usaully love the sound of my voice so much i post the same thing at least twice--oztwat see you in the moon[/quote] I see that nothing changes,imposters should be banned & at least look credible.
I also find this rubbish a waste of life,with the idiots involved using the site to get as close to football as they ever have.
Makes a change from train spotting I suppopse.
sage wrote:
that previous postwas not me to wankas. ellithicko i suppose. midfield lacks creativitiy--LW lightweight--DH gives everything--taking family to mcdonalds for breakfast--vor has a small willy-this time i will only post this once--i usaully love the sound of my voice so much i post the same thing at least twice--oztwat see you in the moon
I see that nothing changes,imposters should be banned & at least look credible.
I also find this rubbish a waste of life,with the idiots involved using the site to get as close to football as they ever have.
Makes a change from train spotting I suppopse.
Posted by: sage, mids on 7:09pm Fri 21 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
Oztwat a couple of points: 1. I think you have made EXEMPLARS point somewhat don`t you? 2. Why do you keep trying to entice men to your gay bar? many of us like women. Just `cos VOR has become your b***h do not think that you are irrestible! Enuff of dealing with morons! TBB, stoke run in is better & that is why I predict them & us--Hull will not do it I feel.[/quote] have you noticed that both I and EXEMPLAR use & instead of 'and'?
Thats because we are the same person. I cab't help having multiple personalities. Eachone is really small.
sage wrote:
Oztwat a couple of points: 1. I think you have made EXEMPLARS point somewhat don`t you? 2. Why do you keep trying to entice men to your gay bar? many of us like women. Just `cos VOR has become your b***h do not think that you are irrestible! Enuff of dealing with morons! TBB, stoke run in is better & that is why I predict them & us--Hull will not do it I feel.
have you noticed that both I and EXEMPLAR use & instead of 'and'?
Thats because we are the same person. I cab't help having multiple personalities. Eachone is really small.
Posted by: sage, mids on 7:11pm Fri 21 Mar 08
[quote][bold]sage[/bold] wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine. [/quote] this is the best example of me using & i am very proud of it so is EXEMPLAR we are both still down the pub drinking really strong adnams
sage wrote:
I felt that LB & JJ were joint top v stoke--LB has brought compusure & anticipation to defence-a great buy--JJ was in & out v Bristol but v Stoke he was great offensively & defensively--clearly a star in the making--strength-pas sing-tackling- goals-height-good engine.
this is the best example of me using & i am very proud of it so is EXEMPLAR we are both still down the pub drinking really strong adnams
Posted by: VoR, Watford on 8:08pm Fri 21 Mar 08
Even I am getting fed up with these imposter postings,
Please stop......PLEASE.
NE - pathetic player
NE - pathetic poster
Please stop!!!
Even I am getting fed up with these imposter postings,
Please stop......PLEASE.
NE - pathetic player
NE - pathetic poster
Please stop!!!
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
