Tenants face increase in annual bills (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Watford Community Housing Trust to introduce weekly service charge to tenants
11:07am Friday 16th November 2012 in News
By Mike Wright, Chief Reporter
Social and affordable housing tenants in Watford will be hit with new annual bills of up to £600 after the Watford Community Housing Trust announced it was introducing a weekly service charge.
The trust sent out letters over the weekend saying it would be rolling out weekly charges of up to £12 a week to claw back £2.5m it says it spends on communal services.
However, the move has left tenants shocked and upset at facing steep rises in their rent costs.
One tenant, who asked not to be identified, said: “It came as a shock. We are in the worst recession in living memory and they expect people to stump up £50 a week.”
The trust has said the new charges will come in from April and will be gradually introduced over three years.
In the first year tenants will pay 30 per cent of the overall charge, then 70 per cent from April 2014 and the full service charge from April 2015. The service charge is being capped at a maximum of £12 a week for those three years.
The trust said the service charge will cover services including grounds maintenance, CCTV, door entry systems, caretaking, fire alarms and looking after communal areas.
The majority of services are incurred by residents living in flats and those tenants will be charged on a block by block basis. However service charges for green spaces – such as grass cutting, litter picking, hedge trimming and tree pruning – will be split between all trust tenants and lease-holders.
The decision to introduce service charges was made in October by the Trust’s board, which is made up of five tenants, five independents and two Watford Borough Council nominees. Diane Lee, chairman of Watford Community Housing Trust, said: “The services we will be charging for are not covered by the rent and they are currently costing us £2.5 million per year to provide.
“Charging for these services will enable us to continue providing them in the future as well as continuing our investment in our homes and neighbourhoods. However we know that this is a difficult time to start adding charges to the rent, so that is why we are phasing in the full charge over three years.”
Comments(15)
crazyfrog
says...
12:22pm Fri 16 Nov 12
So if you live in a council house you have to pay a service charge for green spaces – such as grass cutting, litter picking, hedge trimming and tree pruning ?
so now all " house" residents can ask watford housing trust to cut their front and back lawns? litter pick their gardens? and prune their trees right?
i dont know where they get this green spaces charge because that is the remit of watford borough council paid for via the council tax rates
SC Garston
says...
12:34pm Fri 16 Nov 12
SC Garston
says...
12:34pm Fri 16 Nov 12
crazyfrog
says...
12:58pm Fri 16 Nov 12
crazyfrog
says...
1:02pm Fri 16 Nov 12
The Rover
says...
1:11pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Paul Gadd
says...
10:08pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Less privatisation, less tax duty on fuel, keeping more people in jobs and a stop to illegal wars would help- but what silly ideas, as the rich may not be able to afford that Harrods hamper for Xmas...
kingofpop
says...
10:22pm Fri 16 Nov 12
crazyfrog
says...
10:36pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Maclanx
says...
10:53pm Fri 16 Nov 12
crazyfrog wrote:Just a guess but I would have thought the 'green spaces' would include:
Come on WCHT, My friend who is a HOUSE Tennant would like to know where are the "Green Spaces" (that he will now be paying £50 per month extra towards the up keep) are? where is this exclusive to WCHT paying Tennant's only "Green Space" where he can go and enjoy at the cost of £50 per month?
- Croxley View in between the rows of houses
- Haines Way in between the rows of flats
- Goodrich Close, Kingswood.
Seems quite obvious that these aren't parks like Cassiobury Park funded by Council but areas run by the Housing Authority, whatever it's name is now.
crazyfrog
says...
11:03pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Su Murray
says...
2:10am Sun 18 Nov 12
So of course, we had to syphon it out to 'Private enterprise'. Does anyone really assume that Watford Community Housing Trust isn't making a profit at our expense?
Btw Garston Tony, the majority of housing benefit recipients, are actually in work. Doesn't it say more about the private rental market than anything else? And shouldn't we be tackling that, instead of trying to take more from those who in the main part,have the least to give?
garston tony
says...
3:03pm Tue 20 Nov 12
SC Garton, that’s my point. The £50pw comes from a comment by 'one tenant' in the article. I'm assuming that they receive partial housing benefit and that is their portion of the rent they have to pay. Instead of complaining about their contribution be thankfull you don’t have to pay the full amount and at market rates!
Crazy frog, NO NO NO. If you live in a house your rent has been subsidising the cost of maintaining a communal garden for instance at a block of flats. These new charges mean that the house tenant will no longer be subsidising this and the charge for maintaining a communal garden at a block of flats will fall directly on the occupants of those flats and no one else. Seriously, what is wrong with this concept?
Paul Gadd, not everyone in social housing is vulnerable and not everyone fending for themselves is capable. What about the vulnerable in society struggling to make their own way who are subsidising those in social housing?
kingofpop, I did say most would be on benefits therefore acknowledging that there are tenants who do pay their own way. Albeit at a reduced rate hey.
Crazyfrog, your friend will NOT be paying for green spaces to be maintained by WCHT. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT. Your anger is mis placed
crazyfrog
says...
5:34pm Tue 20 Nov 12
garston tony says...
11:34am Fri 16 Nov 12
Plus the likely hood is most of those affected will be in receipt of housing benefit so the charge will be paid for most of them anyway. Which ultimately means as usual us the tax payer.
As to that tenant complaining about paying £50pw for somewhere to live, look at the cost of housing in the big bad world. £50pw wouldn’t even get you a dingy room in a shared house let alone anywhere near a place of your own.