Harlequin Centre name to change to Intu Watford as part of a nationwide rebrand

Harlequin Centre's name is to change to Intu Watford as part of a nationwide rebrand Harlequin Centre's name is to change to Intu Watford as part of a nationwide rebrand

The Harlequin Shopping Centre is set to change its name to as part of a nationwide rebrand being undertaken by its operator.

The Watford Observer understands the centre's name will be change to Intu Watford.

The move comes after Capital Shopping Centres, which runs the centre, announced it is renaming a number of its 15 shopping centres by adding the moniker Intu into the names.

 

No date has yet been set for when the Watford rebrand will come into effect.

 

The move comes as Capital is in the process of taking over the Charter Place shopping centre, which adjoins the Harlequin.

Comments(87)

mkhornet says...
9:40am Wed 16 Jan 13

"Intu Watford" how stupid, Everyone will still call it the Harlequin anyway!

elvis78 says...
9:47am Wed 16 Jan 13

Born the Harlequin,,,,,,Die the Harlequin

Oxhey-Moron says...
10:00am Wed 16 Jan 13

A bit pointless. Why fix what isn't broken?

Hornets number 12 fan says...
10:15am Wed 16 Jan 13

We're going INTU Watford to shop at the HARLEQUIN!

jasonwatford says...
10:25am Wed 16 Jan 13

RUBBISH

overhere says...
10:26am Wed 16 Jan 13

elvis78 wrote:
Born the Harlequin,,,,,,Die the Harlequin
IIRC it was originally going to be called Mars 2, then before it was finished they decided on Harlequin.

Romo says...
10:27am Wed 16 Jan 13

I'm with the above, nobody will call it that.

Its like when Newcastle United changed St James' Park to 'The Sports Direct Arena' - it just didn't work, and nor will this.

Andrew Turpie says...
10:27am Wed 16 Jan 13

Just close the place now, it's an overpriced dump and now will be given a "ghetto" style name which doesn't exist in the dictionary. Last time I looked it was "into". Laughable.

Andrew Turpie says...
10:32am Wed 16 Jan 13

Smacks of the company paying £100k consultants to dream up this tripe.

The same was attempted in the summer when coming up with Edinburgh's "Incredinburgh" slogan.

Let's just say it wasn't recieved well with by the residents and the "consultant" apparently resigned from the post...

comments says...
10:39am Wed 16 Jan 13

what a load of crap!

not a regular says...
10:42am Wed 16 Jan 13

I look forward to continuing to shop at the Harlequin.

Andrew Turpie says...
10:49am Wed 16 Jan 13

Royal Mail > Consignia > Royal Mail anyone?

Watfordengineer says...
10:50am Wed 16 Jan 13

Dorothy Thornhill Shopping centre anyone?
Personally I think "the harlequin" is a a good name. and branding it the same as the rest of their shopping centres so around the country you see Intu Uxbridge and Intu Gatehead wont make me think.. "got to shop there its like the one I have at home!"

Mohandas says...
10:50am Wed 16 Jan 13

The changing retail sector is always about how you display yourself to the public especially if CSC is repositioning in response to the current macro-environmental factors. The Harlequin name can hardly be said to be standing in the dark. Merely changing a name just shows how much we still judge a book by the cover. Whether this move is proactive or reactive, the end game is always about profit. The key question everyone is asking whether it is time to rebrand a well known name?

HertsPeter says...
10:58am Wed 16 Jan 13

Intu!!!!?!?!?!

Pass the sick bucket!!!

Andrew Turpie says...
11:08am Wed 16 Jan 13

Into-lerable
Into-xicated

blonde demon says...
11:12am Wed 16 Jan 13

Judging by the reaction to renaming the Harlaquin isnt it time these people listened to what the public want and going by the reaction on here it seems we want the Harlequin and we are the ones that keep this place open by spending our money at the Harlaquin maybe we should all boycot the place one saturday and maybe the owners might then see we want the HARLAQUIN not some intu

pepsiman says...
11:29am Wed 16 Jan 13

Call it Intuition........but i think its great..

Victor Value says...
11:55am Wed 16 Jan 13

How about doing something about the ever-increasing number of empty shops. There is nothing there which you won't find either bigger or better at Brent Cross, where parking is free. Maybe they could reduce the huge rents that apparently forced Waterstone's out and see if some independent shops could open. Otherwise I feel it is locked in a death spiral.

circus says...
11:55am Wed 16 Jan 13

I suppose it's to match the Westfield branding. Not such a good name, innit.

PedroHornet says...
12:11pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Is this something dreamed up by an overpaid consultant, working in an overpriced office in an ivory tower, who has never been to Watford? "Harlequin" signifies something bright, colourful and cheerful and is well known by the population in Herts and NW London. What does "INTU" mean to anyone? Re- branding means re-advertising costing yet even more money which, at the end of the day, is passed on to hard pressed shoppers. In the many years to come, the people in and around Watford will still call The Harlequin - "The Harlequin".

Watfordengineer says...
12:12pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Victor Value wrote:
How about doing something about the ever-increasing number of empty shops. There is nothing there which you won't find either bigger or better at Brent Cross, where parking is free. Maybe they could reduce the huge rents that apparently forced Waterstone's out and see if some independent shops could open. Otherwise I feel it is locked in a death spiral.
really?! i think the harlequin has actually weathered the storm very well. Waterstones is nose diving as is alot of high street brands, this is nothing to do with the shopping centre. it moved some stores around to get a 3 unit wide Apple store in which I think is a great asset. not forgetting the new lego store!

garston tony says...
12:12pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Rubish name, but why change the name anyway? Surely every one who is going to be interested in shopping there knows about the place already, calling it something else isnt going to make it attractive suddenly to a new so far untapped market.

It does smack or rebranding for the sake of it, but really stupid name

LSC says...
12:38pm Wed 16 Jan 13

If the company was called 'Intu', it might make sense. If 'Intu' was an actual word, it might make sense.
This makes no sense and therefore by definition is stupid.

miss_caz says...
1:03pm Wed 16 Jan 13

I think its a silly idea for 20+ years its been the Harlequin everyone knows it as the Harlequin the name should stay

watfordrick says...
1:06pm Wed 16 Jan 13

I think the name will suit more of the ethnic community as it is easier to pronounce. Its a good thing and will represent the community better.

Mohandas says...
1:19pm Wed 16 Jan 13

watfordrick wrote:
I think the name will suit more of the ethnic community as it is easier to pronounce. Its a good thing and will represent the community better.
Solid Vicky Pollard & Catharine Tate thinks it's real cool 'Am I bothered?'

Sara says...
1:30pm Wed 16 Jan 13

I expect people will still call it 'the Harlequin' just as many people still shop in Trewins!

TRT says...
1:36pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Pointless exercise which will come back to bite them INTU the butt.

Andrew Turpie says...
1:38pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Mohandas wrote:
watfordrick wrote:
I think the name will suit more of the ethnic community as it is easier to pronounce. Its a good thing and will represent the community better.
Solid Vicky Pollard & Catharine Tate thinks it's real cool 'Am I bothered?'
"bovvered?"

hawkhorn says...
1:44pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Absolute and utter rubbish, waste of time. The town centre is a dump anyway, no amount of re modelling or name changing can fix that!

MarsLander says...
1:53pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Ridiculous. This is too stupid to be even called dumbing down.

E.Coli says...
2:01pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Why not rename it TNUC after the person who thought the new name up

MJ1 says...
2:27pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Here's some history. The Harlequin shopping centre, orginally code named MARS1 when built in the 1980s, was named after the local (DC) railway route from Euston to Watford that was known in those days as the Harlequin Line. The plan was to restore the High Street station and name that also Harlequin. The Croxley rail link was also being talked about in those days so the station would become a hub for the new shopping centre with shoppers traveling by rail.
In the event, the newly privatised railway company that won the franchaise for the line promptly dropped Harlequin, said they had no money for the station and of course we are still talking about the Croxley Link 25 years later. The MARS1 was built by Capital and Counties with WBC as 7% shareholders. CapCo as they were known were wholly owned in South Africa at the height of the apartheid regime . The Labour Party was committed to sanctions against apartheid South Africa which led to an irreconcilable spilt on the Labour Council with the right wing breaking away (having supported CapCo) and voting with Tories and the one Liberal. A quarter of a decade later Capital still own the Harlequin but now want to rename it 'Intu' - rather african sounding wouldn't you agree? Back to their roots?

Maclanx says...
2:39pm Wed 16 Jan 13

comments wrote:
what a load of crap!
Exactly my words!

Wacko Jacko says...
4:03pm Wed 16 Jan 13

MJ1 wrote:
Here's some history. The Harlequin shopping centre, orginally code named MARS1 when built in the 1980s, was named after the local (DC) railway route from Euston to Watford that was known in those days as the Harlequin Line. The plan was to restore the High Street station and name that also Harlequin. The Croxley rail link was also being talked about in those days so the station would become a hub for the new shopping centre with shoppers traveling by rail.
In the event, the newly privatised railway company that won the franchaise for the line promptly dropped Harlequin, said they had no money for the station and of course we are still talking about the Croxley Link 25 years later. The MARS1 was built by Capital and Counties with WBC as 7% shareholders. CapCo as they were known were wholly owned in South Africa at the height of the apartheid regime . The Labour Party was committed to sanctions against apartheid South Africa which led to an irreconcilable spilt on the Labour Council with the right wing breaking away (having supported CapCo) and voting with Tories and the one Liberal. A quarter of a decade later Capital still own the Harlequin but now want to rename it 'Intu' - rather african sounding wouldn't you agree? Back to their roots?
Thanks for this history lesson Mike, very interesting, but I doubt the name is much to do with their roots, more one of those daft marketing ideas like O2, Corus, Axa and the rest which have no meaning at all. Names like this are equally at home branding a new car, an ailing company or a tired shopping centre. It's just more marketing cobblers, but if it means the place gets a makeover and loses the dated 1970's harlequin colour scheme that's one thing in its favour I suppose

TRT says...
4:17pm Wed 16 Jan 13

70's? I'd put their colour scheme as firmly in the 90s. If you want to see a 70's styling, look at the Arndale centre in Bolton, with it's beige, bronze and gold everywhere.

Andrew Turpie says...
4:30pm Wed 16 Jan 13

E.Coli wrote:
Why not rename it TNUC after the person who thought the new name up
Ha Ha :D

Claire2009x says...
5:16pm Wed 16 Jan 13

They need to sort out all the empty and crap shops inside first! Not the same anymore!

KeithMercer says...
8:37pm Wed 16 Jan 13

I think its a great name ! one of the best shopping center names I have heard in a long time and it will indeed inspire me to visit on a regular basis .
Cant wait for this to happen, a great day for the town !!

theturpster says...
8:42pm Wed 16 Jan 13

KeithMercer wrote:
I think its a great name ! one of the best shopping center names I have heard in a long time and it will indeed inspire me to visit on a regular basis .
Cant wait for this to happen, a great day for the town !!
I hope to god that is sarcasm, if not allow me to weep for the future.

theturpster says...
8:51pm Wed 16 Jan 13

They should be forced to open in :

Hole Bottom in Yorkshire and Twatt in the Shetlands, that would put paid to their stupid plans.

E.Coli says...
9:33pm Wed 16 Jan 13

theturpster wrote:
They should be forced to open in :

Hole Bottom in Yorkshire and Twatt in the Shetlands, that would put paid to their stupid plans.
What about bell end

Jotyanne says...
10:14pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Utter rubbish, another way to spend more of the publics money and divert attention away from the real issues - IT WILL ALWAYS BE The Harlequin!!!

daz1920 says...
11:37pm Wed 16 Jan 13

this is a stupid idea and the new name just is stupid also you should think of the elderly do they want it changed it shouldn't be down to these people in an office . it the whole towns choice let every one have there say.it a recession put the money toward making new jobs in the harlequin

TRT says...
11:39pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Hawes, Yorkshire? F***ing in Austria?

theturpster says...
6:15am Thu 17 Jan 13

E.Coli wrote:
theturpster wrote:
They should be forced to open in :

Hole Bottom in Yorkshire and Twatt in the Shetlands, that would put paid to their stupid plans.
What about bell end
Ain't that where the fresh prince is from?

Razor Sharp says...
8:11am Thu 17 Jan 13

What a stupid name!

crazyfrog says...
9:06am Thu 17 Jan 13

Whats intu? Is it short for something? a company name? why bother spending money on rebranding it as people will still refer to it as the harlequin!

i think somenbody has just wasted some money on a useless consultant

TRT says...
9:56am Thu 17 Jan 13

"i think somenbody has just wasted some money on a useless consultant"

Wouldn't be the first time.
I wonder if they will open a mall in Tooting?

Phil Drackley says...
10:03am Thu 17 Jan 13

I think the owners of a place, be it shopping centre or factory, can call it what they want - as can the people that use it.
The owners can please themselves by having all their properties having the same made-up name and the public can still shop in the Harlequin.
After all, it's the shops inside that the people go to, not the name on the outside.

davesol says...
11:25am Thu 17 Jan 13

Jotyanne wrote:
Utter rubbish, another way to spend more of the publics money and divert attention away from the real issues - IT WILL ALWAYS BE The Harlequin!!!
what public money is being spent? it's the operator that has decided to change the name not the council.

Boosey says...
11:27am Thu 17 Jan 13

watfordrick wrote:
I think the name will suit more of the ethnic community as it is easier to pronounce. Its a good thing and will represent the community better.
If some people can't pronounce Harlequin, then i'm sure they are not working, so whatever they call it, your so called ethnic community won't be able to afford to shop there. What **** **** you speak!

keb77 says...
11:33am Thu 17 Jan 13

The name is not the problem. No Waterstones, no Dorothy Perkins. The Harlequin owners are too greedy and forcing even large, well known stores out with their ridiculously high rents. How do they expect to attract customers to shop there? I can't remember the last time I set foot in that place! I would rather go to one of the other shopping centres out of Watford that offer more choice!

CaptainPC says...
11:52am Thu 17 Jan 13

A private company is changing their branding. Get over it.

Roy Stockdill says...
12:08pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Whatever they call it, it will still look as if it could be in Darlington, Wigan, Bournemouth, Basildon, Chipping Sodbury or Timbuktu - in other words, like every other shopping mall in the world, utterly devoid of personality or individuality and full of dreary chain shops all the same.

A pity we can't turn back the clock, scrap these anonymous, impersonal shopping centres and re-generate town centres with lots of independent, individual shops that offer choice, value for money and something different. But, of course, it won't happen since we have allowed these big developers of shopping malls to take over the world.

Andrew1963 says...
12:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Roy of course is wrong - as most shopping centres the size of Harlequin are out of town - its selling point was that it is the town centre rather than on the triangle of land between the M1; M25 and A405. The main pioint is that town centres need to change to take into the changes in retailing - driven by customers who prefer in many instances to shop online or at large supermarkets and department stores. The rebranding is following the same logic that means that watford now has a 'John Lewis' department store rather than 'Trewin Bros' department store. The reason why most shops that fail are actually independents rather than chains is because the majority of people despite what they say, actually choose to shop at large chains rather than independents. In watford Clements Department store decided to close - despite owning their own building and therefore not at the mercy of corporate property companies - because their customers increasingly decided to shop elsewhere rather than support an "independent, individual, good value local department store".

Roy Stockdill says...
1:04pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Well, I very rarely shop in The Harlequin if I can help it and, yes, I still call John Lewis's Trewin's. I would rather buy my shirts and ties at Moss Bros in the High Street than any men's outfitters in The Harlequin.

I find The Harlequin dreary and impersonal and I am shocked to learn that Waterstone's has gone, since that was one of the few stores I did patronise. WH Smith and supermarkets are not in the same league when it comes to providing for book lovers because specialist stores like Waterstone's carry a much larger, more comprehensive stock.

I happen to believe we should be trying to keep the independent, specialist shops and stores alive, even if we do sometimes have to pay a little more. I find it very sad that Britain is becoming a desert of boring shopping malls.

Being a hi-fi fanatic, I recall Watford used to have two good specialist dealers, one on the corner of Station Road and St Albans Road (forget the name) and Sevenoaks H-Fi at North Watford near me, but the latter has decamped to Chorleywood.

I confess to using Amazon and other online retailers occasionally, but I fear internet shopping will kill off just about every shop in existence, just as it is killing off local newspapers.

TRT says...
1:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

davesol wrote:
Jotyanne wrote:
Utter rubbish, another way to spend more of the publics money and divert attention away from the real issues - IT WILL ALWAYS BE The Harlequin!!!
what public money is being spent? it's the operator that has decided to change the name not the council.
And they are going to pay for the changes to all the signage around Watford?

Roy Stockdill says...
1:08pm Thu 17 Jan 13

>Whats intu?<

Sounds like a tribe of pygmies in darkest Africa! In the good old days before barmy political correctness took over, I can just hear the Round The Horne cast doing a sketch on "The Intu tribe" and being up to their knees in the LImpopo.

MarsLander says...
1:23pm Thu 17 Jan 13

The Harlequin has little meaning as a word in Watford, but it is pleasant enough to hear and say.

Intu has no meaning whatsoever and is less pleasing on the ear.

May I suggest to the owners they change all their shopping centres to the better of the two names, "The Harlequin"? It sounds like dumbing down to have a name like Intu and therefore offends the sensibilities.

We could all organise a peoples boycott of the centre. How about boycotting the shopping centre on Sundays until they see reason? Once the shops fear a customer backlash the pressure will soon be on for the owners to rescind their frankly quite daft proposal for renaming.

People power!

Sly Si says...
1:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

...and where do you think they'll get a return on the money spent on marketing? Through increased parking fees, of course. Forget free parking per-Xmas. They'll soon have premium spaces on floors 1-3 for a premium price...wait, did I just them an idea?!

CaptainPC says...
3:46pm Thu 17 Jan 13

You are all mad.

TRT says...
4:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Don't you think it sounds a bit like that Japanese soup place, Itsu?

Andrew1963 says...
10:36pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Sly Si wrote:
...and where do you think they'll get a return on the money spent on marketing? Through increased parking fees, of course. Forget free parking per-Xmas. They'll soon have premium spaces on floors 1-3 for a premium price...wait, did I just them an idea?!
They have renamed the whole company.They are going to launch an online website called Intu where you can order goods from the companies in the shopping centres - a bit like an alternative Amazon.They intend to build an internet business to compliment the retail centres. Thats where they will make the money on the marketing spend. They are building the internet brand to make sure that the shopping centres are not the only egg in their basket.Already they offer gift vouchers - which are dodgy if you pick asingle retailer which has the potential to go belly up. With 30 million visitors to their centres every year they obviously think this is the way to go.

LSC says...
10:36pm Thu 17 Jan 13

"The reason why most shops that fail are actually independents rather than chains is because the majority of people despite what they say, actually choose to shop at large chains rather than independents."

Only partly. Price is a big issue and the big guys use loss leaders all the time to kill the opposition.
Your local butcher might well have made his own beefburgers, but Tescos are cheaper.
Well; we learned a valuable lesson on that this week didn't we? Horsemeat burgers from Poland processed and packaged in Ireland and sold as beef in the UK.

Thanks for all the local jobs Tesco. A local independent butcher wouldn't be sourcing meat like that.

Razor Sharp says...
11:28pm Thu 17 Jan 13

If Tesco can do that I wonder what the fast food chains include in their products.

LSC says...
12:35am Fri 18 Jan 13

Razor Sharp wrote:
If Tesco can do that I wonder what the fast food chains include in their products.
To be honest, I'm not so worried about the horse meat itself, it is the lies and lack of checking that bothers me.
The burgers had pork in too. Again, that doesn't bother me but some people think that makes the difference to whether they go to heaven or not.

While I might snigger at that belief, and why their god wouldn't cut them some slack in the circumstances, it is very real to them and not fair.

Razor Sharp says...
8:13am Fri 18 Jan 13

LSC, Muslims and Jews wouldn't have purchased that meat anyway, since it wouldn't have been halal or kosher respectively.

As for heaven, that has very little to do with it if one considers the practical and contextual aspects of the religion. For instance, until refrigeration and modern preservation techniques, pig related meats had a high incidence of tape worm for most months of the year.

If I pay for a particular meat, I expect it to be as described, rather than as prescribed by religion or other morality.

Profit margins, lack of quality controls and quality assurance, a lack of due diligence checks of the supplier and supply chains, together with a low risk of detection of foreign meat contaminants probably led to a laissez faire culture and complacency. It's made me more cautious about beef burgers. I do not wish to eat pork and I definitely do not wish to eat horse meat. It's almost as bad as having dog meat in there. A horse is more like a pet rather than part of the human food chain. As for pork, it's too fatty.

Religion sometimes has a practical context, which others might overlook. I refuse to eat pork and bacon, because it makes me physically nauseous and is too fatty. I would normally buy fresh steak. At least there is less likelihood of foreign meat contaminants or at least not in any significant quantities.

Roy Stockdill says...
11:52am Fri 18 Jan 13

I believe that during WWII people ate horse meat and I very much doubt many people suffered after effects from it. Indeed, I have been told the French still enjoy it today but, of course, they are French! I also understand that eating dogs is quite popular in China and Korea. I don't know whether it's still sold but wasn't there a vogue a while back for ostrich meat and alligator steaks?

Personally, I love a nice big juicy pork chop with lots of crackling on it. Sadly, because everybody has become obsessed with so-called healthy eating and political correctness, it's difficult to find crackling any more because supermarkets, playing nanny-knows-best, won't sell it. When I was a kid I also loved a slice of bread and pork dripping the next day.

A pork chop with apple sauce - or a nice Barnsley double lamb chop, being a Yorkshireman - with chips and a fried egg, washed down with a decent Merlot or Rioja, is my idea of heavenly eating! There's a lot of rubbish and nonsense talked about diet and no nannying minister, civil servant, NHS bully or doctor will ever stop me from enjoying what I eat. As for not eating pork and bacon because of fears it might not get you entry through the pearly gates.....well, what can I say? I wouldn't mind betting that if half a dozen Muslims were stranded in the desert or a jungle and the only animal around was a pig, they'd soon forget their religious principles!

Andrew Turpie says...
11:53am Fri 18 Jan 13

Amazing that how many people buy from that tax avoiding on line retailer that's mentioned on here, I was right about morals going out the window when it comes down to consumerisim lol.

Roy Stockdill says...
12:23pm Fri 18 Jan 13

You are of course, quite right, Andrew. But tax avoidance has been going on ever since William the Conqueror commissioned the Domesday Book, which was the first English census in 1085/6, with the intention of collecting taxes from his land-owning subjects.

Let's face it, we would all do it if we could! I employ an accountant to do my tax returns, as I imagine most self-employed people do.

I presume you are talking about Amazon? I confess I buy things through them and last year I bought a hi-fi streamer to play my digitised music files on for just over £100 when the RRP at most dealers was £140, a saving of almost 30 per cent. Yes, I felt a bit guilty because I happen to believe in supporting High Street retailers, but what are we pensioners to do?

Razor Sharp says...
12:32pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Consumerism is the new addiction - the crack cocaine of the future. The UK riots were testimony to that. E-commerce and m-commerce are the matrix style plug-in.

Intu is the Dealer in the high street, hiding in plain view, although small scale when compared to Westfield.

I buy from Amazon, as well as high street retailers. I'm a Tech Junkie and proud of it.

I still hate the name 'Intu'!

Andrew Turpie says...
12:39pm Fri 18 Jan 13

I wasn't naming names Roy, but you could be correct lol.

I don't think I would avoid paying the proper rate of tax in any situation, because I clearly understand the need to keep hospitals, schools and infrastructure maintained. I also would like to see pensioners who have worked hard to be looked after in their twilight years as a reward for the sacrifices they made, generating tax and NI in their working life.

I know avoidance or dodging is not a new concept, but I reckon if "that" company paid the going rate from day dot in this country, then the savings to the customer would not be as generous, keeping the High Street outlets on a level playing field.

So really not only are those that buy from these online sites, killng the High Street, they are playing a big part in killing the whole economy and I get the feeling that either the majority don't look at that big picture out of ignorance, or just flatly do not care. If the latter, then I weep for the future (again).

LSC says...
12:47pm Fri 18 Jan 13

"LSC, Muslims and Jews wouldn't have purchased that meat anyway, since it wouldn't have been halal or kosher respectively."

Fair point. I'm sorry to hear you miss out on the delights of bacon though!
No-one will even convince me that Isambard Kingdom Brunel or George Stephenson did what they did without first having a good old bacon butty.

Razor Sharp says...
1:52pm Fri 18 Jan 13

LOL! Different people have different tastes. I just don't like certain meats or how they are prepared, but that's me.

I wouldn't seek to change another's eating habits.

On the other hand, curried sheep's brains are quite a delicacy and one I've enjoyed.

theturpster says...
2:49pm Fri 18 Jan 13

All this food talk has reminded me that Burns night is fast approaching. I need to get my haggis sorted out pronto.

"Wee sleekit cowerin' timorous beastie"

BTW my account seems to be cached on my phone hence changing from Turpster to Andrew Turpie...need to sort that out me thinks!

Roy Stockdill says...
3:26pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Probably to my eternal discredit, I've never sampled haggis but I found the following fascinating account at Wikipedia.....

"Wild haggis (Haggis scoticus) is a fictional creature said to be native to the Scottish Highlands. It is comically claimed to be the source of haggis, a traditional Scottish dish that is in fact made from the innards of sheep (including heart, lungs, and liver).
According to some sources, the wild haggis's left and right legs are of different lengths, allowing it to run quickly around the steep mountains and hillsides which make up its natural habitat, but only in one direction. It is further claimed that there are two varieties of haggis, one with longer left legs and the other with longer right legs. The former variety can run clockwise around a mountain while the latter can run anticlockwise.The two varieties coexist peacefully but are unable to interbreed in the wild because in order for the male of one variety to mate with a female of the other, he must turn to face in the same direction as his intended mate, causing him to lose his balance before he can mount her. As a result of this difficulty, differences in leg length among the haggis population are accentuated. The notion of the wild haggis is widely believed, though not always including the idea of mismatched legs. According to an online survey commissioned by haggis manufacturers Hall's of Broxburn, released on 26 November 2003, one-third of U.S. visitors to Scotland believed the wild haggis to be a real creature."

Knowing Americans, this last statement doesn't surprise me in the least. But, then, they probably believe in the Loch Ness Monster as well!

As I said, I've never tried haggis but I am partial to an Arbroath smokie now and then with a couple of poached eggs.

theturpster says...
3:48pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Haggis tastes better, than it reads in the recipe to be honest. If you ever get a chance to go north of the border, there are a lot of fine eateries which have it on their menu (especially with a nice whisky based sauce).

When I moved down here, one intrigued work colleague managed to be convinced that my dad actually bred them professionally for shows, so that wiki made me laugh.

Sadly, Halls of Broxburn who supplied Scotland with fine meats for generations have just folded, losing 200 jobs. They also produced another fine Scottish delicacy called Lorne sausage.

Shona1 says...
10:21pm Sat 19 Jan 13

I think the Harlequin needs a re - vamp with some new shops, not a new name..

Razor Sharp says...
9:48am Sun 20 Jan 13

And lower rents, otherwise there will be lack of choice, with the usual suspects - big high street names - being present.

Roy Stockdill says...
9:51am Sun 20 Jan 13

>And lower rents, otherwise there will be lack of choice, with the usual suspects - big high street names - being present.<

And that is precisely what will happen! You don't imagine the corporate moguls who run these shopping malls are remotely interested in offering choice or quality to customers or lower rents for more individual shops, do you? All they care about is pulling down as much cash as they possibly can. That is why Waterstone's have been driven out.

LSC says...
12:37pm Sun 20 Jan 13

Razor Sharp wrote:
LOL! Different people have different tastes. I just don't like certain meats or how they are prepared, but that's me.

I wouldn't seek to change another's eating habits.

On the other hand, curried sheep's brains are quite a delicacy and one I've enjoyed.
I don't think I have ever eaten brain, but then I have eaten a Tesco beefburger so I expect I have tried more things than I am even aware of.

mrsmoanalot says...
4:56pm Sun 20 Jan 13

Re: The Harlequin, What a total waste of time, effort and money the re-branding to Intu will be. So when I would have said I'm popping into the Harlequin, I will be be saying I'm popping into Intu....I think NOT!! Please please put more effort Intu renting out the empty shops instead of spending money re-branding. Perhaps the new name should soon be MT (as it soon will be Empty)

D.unstable says...
10:20pm Sun 20 Jan 13

Absolute rubbish, would be better off looking intu why the high street has closed. Why do people have to fiddle and diddle when it is not required.

Shona1 says...
10:22pm Sun 20 Jan 13

D.unstable wrote:
Absolute rubbish, would be better off looking intu why the high street has closed. Why do people have to fiddle and diddle when it is not required.
I agree!!!

Roy Stockdill says...
5:10am Mon 21 Jan 13

It's because some people - politicians, civil servants, councils and big business among them - can't resist meddling with things because they have nothing better to do.

Does anyone remember when the Post Office spent millions changing its name to something daft like Consignia and then spent millions more changing it back? Or when the BBC also spent millions on changing its logo from an italic typeface to an upright one?

As the Yanks say, if it ain't broke then don't fix it!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree