- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Observer_Owl
Follow Watford Observer on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Watford Observer
Like us on Facebook
Council boss: Wage cut agreed (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Council boss: Wage cut agreed
5:50pm Monday 28th January 2013 in News
By Mike Wright, Chief Reporter
The next person to take over Hertfordshire County Council’s second most senior job will be around £20,000 worse off than their predecessor - unless they are considered an exceptional candidate.
Politicians on the authority’s employment committee agreed today to lower the basic salary for the position of director of resources and performance to around £130,000.
The current incumbent, Mike Parsons, who exits the post this week to take up a role in central government, was paid £148,500-a-year.
However councillors agreed with council officers that the basic salary could be boosted to land any "exceptional candidates" who apply for the role.
Comments(11)
Mohandas
says...
6:50pm Mon 28 Jan 13
MarsLander
says...
7:38pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Mohandas wrote:What do you mean by progressive?
Reductions in salary need to be more progresssive in order to attract candidates who are focussed on working for the benefit of the community.Money inducements will not deliver the best candidate when taliking about public services.
MarsLander
says...
7:39pm Mon 28 Jan 13
cameluk wrote:A sensible decision would be to cap it at 100,000 and then only pay that for a top person.
I don't believe it - the council making a sensible decision over salary at last
TRT
says...
2:22am Tue 29 Jan 13
TRT
says...
2:22am Tue 29 Jan 13
Mohandas
says...
8:49am Tue 29 Jan 13
MarsLander wrote:A 15% cut in a wage for someone on a low wage hits the low paid far harder than someone on a high salary. High earners also enjoy very valuable perks eg gold plated pension schemes and enhanced redundancy packages. Up and down the country ordinary employees have to accept wage cuts of 20% or the firm goes bust. In Stoke, front line council staff are set to lose £6,500 and the starting salary for police constables is being cut by £4,000. So a £20,000 cut to someone on £150,000 needs to be more drastic ie at a higher rate.
Mohandas wrote:What do you mean by progressive?
Reductions in salary need to be more progresssive in order to attract candidates who are focussed on working for the benefit of the community.Money inducements will not deliver the best candidate when taliking about public services.
Watfordengineer
says...
9:26am Tue 29 Jan 13
I doubt the councillors would vote a wage level down when there was an incumbent in the role.
MarsLander
says...
9:51am Tue 29 Jan 13
Put a cap on wages and stop this nonsense.
LSC
says...
12:07pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Is, 'Yeah, he's alright' good enough in some cases for our Public Servants?
LSC
says...
12:10pm Tue 29 Jan 13
cameluk says...
5:58pm Mon 28 Jan 13