Council Tax freeze for Watford Borough Council

Watford politicians have voted to freeze its share of the Council Tax but rejected calls to provide financial support struggling businesses over the coming year.

At a Watford Borough Council full meeting on Wednesday, Steve Rackett, leader of the Green group, urged elected mayor Dorothy Thornhill to set aside £100,000 for rate relief for small and medium businesses.

He said retail was a large part of Watford’s economy and using the council’s reserves to help struggling businesses could be more helpful to residents than cutting tax.

Councillor Rackett added cutting Council Tax by one per cent would give residents on an average tax band around 2p a week, whereas rate relief could save jobs.

Mayor Thornhill said the idea would not work as there were so many businesses in the town, £100,000 would make hardly any difference. She argued initiatives such as the renovation of Charter Place would bring more businesses to the town.

She added: "How would we decide which businesses get help?"

At the meeting Mayor Thornhill announced the council would be freezing its 16 per cent share of the Council Tax. Hertfordshire Constabulary, which gets 10 per cent of the county’s tax pound has also frozen its share.

Hertfordshire County Council, which gets the majority - 74 per cent - is yet to make a final decision on its share.

Mayor Thornhill said the council was still facing reductions in the money it gets from Government and would have to rely on its reserves to balance the budget until 2016.

However she ruled out using council reserves to lower Watford’s Council Tax.

She said: "It might be said we should use more of these reserves to further reduce council tax. But in the current circumstances, with capping clearly here to stay whichever government is in power, indeed with pressure for a year on year freeze, it would be irresponsible to reduce our ability to raise money and provide services in the future.

"It would be harder to achieve a balanced budget, with reserves running out more quickly and sooner or later it would mean cuts in services."

Nigel Bell, the leader of the opposition Labour group, attacked the mayor’s proposals as a "do-nothing budget" and said the council should look at using its reserves to further help residents in the town.

He also criticised the plans to build a bridge across the pond in the town centre saying the money should have been used to help start up businesses in the town.

He said: "It is a do nothing budget and as residents look across the bridge across the pond they must think that not only is that a metaphor for the mayor and her administration - a bridge too far and a bridge to nowhere - but think of the small start up businesses that could have been kick-started by some of that £4.5million along St Albans Road."

Comments(6)

MarsLander says...
10:10am Fri 1 Feb 13

horror, the council may have to cut services!

If there are services that can be cut, why not consider cutting them and reducing council taxes?

MarsLander says...
10:11am Fri 1 Feb 13

I'm pleased council taxes have not risen - credit where it's due.

drunkenduck says...
10:19am Fri 1 Feb 13

If Watford council tax had risen or even in the nearby future, the Mayor Thornhill should of resign. After all, she's NOT value for money.

Mohandas says...
10:26am Fri 1 Feb 13

Putting money aside for the rainy day is fine so long as Central Gov doesn’t see fit to punish the prudent and reward the feckless local authorities who just want to spend and spend without thinking what’s round the corner. This raises questions of prudence and judgement for WBC financial sustainability. Employing reserves to protect services from cutbacks is different to propping up local landlords on the St Albans Rd, Market St or Queens Rd who continue to demand high unmarketable rents from small traders. These small traders are struggling to adjust to changing market conditions which requires new investment at a time when their incomes are falling - hence the pop up shops. The traders in Watford Market are a case in point.
But one of underlying problems with the culture of public finance unlike private industry is that you have to spend your budget before the end of the financial year or the money is clawed back.

Roy Stockdill says...
11:20am Fri 1 Feb 13

A good deal of money could be saved by Watford Council ending the system of giving grants to every Tom, Dick and Harry in the town - lobby groups and organisations I mean - that comes along with a begging bowl.

I note from the council's website that its annual Small Grants Fund programme invites applications and "will fund public area clean ups, work to improve the visual look of the town, events celebrating the town’s history, community or diversity."

Ho, hum...here we go again with those dreary old politically correct cliches, community and diversity!

It doesn't say how much is spent annually on the Small Grants Fund but it's probably a sizeable sum.

I am not in favour of any grants at all. If groups and organisations need money to suppport some activity or other, then why shouldn't they pay for it themselves?

cameluk says...
7:13pm Fri 1 Feb 13

"Mayor Thornhill said the idea would not work as there were so many businesses in the town, £100,000 would make hardly any difference. She argued initiatives such as the renovation of Charter Place would bring more businesses to the town."

Spending the money on reducing parking charges would do more to bring in more trade than a lick of paint on Charter Place

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree