Three Rivers District Council chief executive Steven Halls faces calls to resign over leisure centre fiasco

Council chief executive Steven Halls faces calls to resign over leisure centre fiasco Council chief executive Steven Halls faces calls to resign over leisure centre fiasco

Politicians are calling for Three Rivers District Council chief executive Steven Halls to resign in the wake of the debacle surrounding the William Penn Leisure Centre construction.

The motion will be put forward by Conservative Group leader Councillor Chris Hayward at next week’s full council meeting and will request Dr Halls carries the can for "a succession of large construction projects that have turned to disaster", adding that William Penn is "just the latest and the worst".

Work began to build two new pools, an exercise centre and a gymnasium in March 2007 however the new facilities were not open to the public until May 2010 at a cost of £9.1 million, more than double the original estimate.

The motion goes on to say: "The Chief Executive has the ultimate responsibility and accountability for this catastrophic situation and accordingly this Council requests the Chief Executive’s resignation."

However, the motion could face strong opposition in the chamber with a senior figure in the ruling Liberal Democrat party describing the motion as "just the Conservatives trying to make a bit of trouble".

Deputy leader Councillor Les Mead said: "It is crazy really, I just cannot understand it.

"At committee meetings we are all friendly and all get on so well. This is the first I have heard of this but we were all expecting something."

Labour leader Councillor Stephen King said: "We have not discussed it as a group but my personal preference is I wouldn’t support it."

Dr Halls, who earns in the region of £116,000, joined the council in 2003. In 2008 he reduced his working week down to four days to "maintain his work-life balance".

A second motion requests the chief executive to publish the legal grounds under which the amount of money recovered during a recent mediation hearing can be considered exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.

A response says the mediator drew up the confidentiality agreement which could result in any councillor who discloses the figure facing legal action. Any disclosure that could result in an actionable breach of confidence is exempt under section 41 of the act.

Comments(6)

Home Truths says...
12:13pm Wed 20 Feb 13

As the biggest party on the council it is the fib dems who are responsible for all the scew ups. This is just another case of the fib dems blaming everybody but themselves. Complete waste of space, the lot of them..

MarsLander says...
2:37pm Wed 20 Feb 13

Yep

crazyfrog says...
6:07pm Wed 20 Feb 13

well this was the guy that refuses to protect the long island Hotel from developers and then tied the hands of one of the councillors that wanted to save it !

MarsLander says...
6:37pm Wed 20 Feb 13

Sooner the better then.

highhigh says...
11:49pm Wed 20 Feb 13

Surely you must be negligent in your occupation for the lack of action against the constructors etc which resulted in the leisure centre costing double what it should have and taking over three years!! If this was a private company he would have disappeared a long time ago, As its tax-payers money i suppose it is okay

croxleyite says...
8:55am Thu 21 Feb 13

Good riddance to dead wood I say. £116,000 a year for a 4 day week! equates to £600 per day. It's a hard life!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree