Comment: Actions speak louder that tweets - or retweets - Dr Frosh

I was a little taken aback when I learned last week that Hertfordshire’s deputy police commissioner, Rachel Frosh, had resigned.

Her departure came in the wake of a self-inflicted media hubbub caused by her retweeting a picture and a quote of Adolf Hitler on Twitter.

The tweet read: “Dear #Socialists embrace your inner #Nazisim”. In the quote attached, from 1927, the Nazi leader describes his party as socialist and expresses his hatred of capitalism. The retweet was provocative and upset some other users of the social media site.

But it seemed more the naive action of a political dilettante who had not adjusted to her elevation as a high-profile public office rather than a blunder necessitating she fall on her sword.

Since her resignation Dr Frosh has penned a number of blogposts and letters explaining the retweet. In her letter to this paper, she seems to be under the misapprehension that all the fuss about her retweet was to do with the media wanting to stifle discussion of the Nazis.

Here I think Dr Frosh may have missed the point.

No one is denying her right to publicly debate the political origins of Nazism. That said, that was not what she was doing with the contentious retweet.

She was disseminating a partisan point aimed at provoking people on the left of the political spectrum by linking them with Hitler.

Personally, I can’t see much in common with any wing of mainstream UK politics and the Third Reich’s psychotic creed of extermination. I also fail to see what is to be gained by trying to link political opponents to such an unequivocally evil movement.

But we are a country that values free speech – unlike Hitler’s Germany. If people want to use Hitler to make crass and insensitive political points, they are free to do so.

The difference is that when Dr Frosh retweeted the picture and quote she was not just a member of Joe Public. She was a senior Hertfordshire politician, wielding influence over a police force that protects more than a million residents. It is natural that they will take more interest in what she does and says.

On her blog, Dr Frosh explained she resigned to avoid causing further problems for her boss – police commissioner David Lloyd – but also as she wanted to answer the questions surrounding the retweet and to retain her freedom to comment on politics.

She said: “So I have therefore resigned – because he (Mr Lloyd) needs to get on with his job, and I want to answer these questions, and also be able to comment on national political issues.”

I find it bizarre Dr Frosh appears to value commenting on national political issues over serving as deputy police commissioner.

I had always assumed (possibly naively) the point of politics and political careers was to achieve things of substance.

Anyone can make their views known on national politics. Few are given the chance to actually put their principles into action.

So if Dr Frosh wants to dedicate herself to fulminating on the political sidelines that is her prerogative.

It is probably the safest place for her and, by the look of it, also the residents of Hertfordshire.

Comments(12)

LSC says...
4:31pm Fri 22 Feb 13

From what I am led to believe, she is a qualified medical doctor, a Harpenden Councillor and a failed parliamentary candidate.
'Should know better' doesn't even come close.

some bloke says...
12:41am Sat 23 Feb 13

Actually, this is very simple. Frosh failed to be aware of the first corollary of Godwins Law: when you draw an analogy to Hitler of Nazism, you lose.

She lost.

http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Godwin's_la
w

theguitarman says...
7:01am Sat 23 Feb 13

Isn't this just a case of the mind using the wrong words at the wrong time ?, we are all guilty of doing this, its called " putting you foot in the mouth".

The simple answer is "engage brain before opening mouth" and think about what you are saying.

theturpster says...
10:58am Sat 23 Feb 13

Over the top for a retweet, in my opinion- proves one thing the gullible masses will believe what they read on the internet at face value without really knowing how the person behind it ticks, to judge anything and anyone in 160? (I don't use twatter) characters is a dangerous game.

Holywell Voter says...
11:59am Sat 23 Feb 13

My Head Teacher once said "when I open my mouth some fool speaks". Perhaps Dr. Frosh should take note. Many warned that the whole police commissioner election was a waste of resources and so it is proving. The Hertfordshire Police Commissioner so far is known for only two policies - appointing and then sacking a Deputy and the ludicrous proposal that those arrested should pay for their accomodation in the cells. The police commissoner - a tiny vote but a huge salary.

miwe2 says...
12:29pm Sat 23 Feb 13

Seems like we have all had a narrow escape, think what she could have done had she actually done any work as Assistant Commisioner. Pity we had this shambles lumbered on us in the first place, remember whose bright idea it was.

LSC says...
1:39pm Sat 23 Feb 13

Holywell Voter wrote:
My Head Teacher once said "when I open my mouth some fool speaks". Perhaps Dr. Frosh should take note. Many warned that the whole police commissioner election was a waste of resources and so it is proving. The Hertfordshire Police Commissioner so far is known for only two policies - appointing and then sacking a Deputy and the ludicrous proposal that those arrested should pay for their accomodation in the cells. The police commissoner - a tiny vote but a huge salary.
There is another policy; having adverts...sorry, sponsorship on things like police cars and other equipment. 'This stab vest is brought to you by Mothercare', or a Tazer with Toys R Us written on it.

Mohandas says...
5:59pm Sat 23 Feb 13

theturpster wrote:
Over the top for a retweet, in my opinion- proves one thing the gullible masses will believe what they read on the internet at face value without really knowing how the person behind it ticks, to judge anything and anyone in 160? (I don't use twatter) characters is a dangerous game.
That's the problem, the masses would really like to have a window into the hearts of the political class. Perhaps in these unguarded moments when they are drunk with power, they do expose themselves as merely concerned with ' disseminating a partisan point aimed at provoking people' and nothing to do with substance or priniciple.

Sara says...
11:16pm Sat 23 Feb 13

I really don't see why there should be a conflict between being active in local politics and having views on national issues. Everyone should be prepared to comment openly and stand by what they say. But also others should not try to second guess or twist the words used.

LSC says...
12:24pm Sun 24 Feb 13

Sara wrote:
I really don't see why there should be a conflict between being active in local politics and having views on national issues. Everyone should be prepared to comment openly and stand by what they say. But also others should not try to second guess or twist the words used.
I agree Sara, but if you are active in politics at any level, then the views you chose to make public are going to be scrutinised. That goes with the job.
I can say what I like on here, and many, I'm sure, think I'm an idiot.
But that doesn't matter because I'm nobody to them. However, if I was the person in charge of their safety, or their taxes, I would expect every word I type to be pored over and rightly so.

If I stood for election on a perfectly sensible manifesto and then let it slip that even though I had no intention of implementing it, my person belief is we should spray paint all the pigeons in the town blue because it would look prettier, then there is a chance that despite my manifesto I would lose because I was clearly barking mad.

Andrew Turpie says...
2:17pm Mon 25 Feb 13

LSC wrote:
Sara wrote:
I really don't see why there should be a conflict between being active in local politics and having views on national issues. Everyone should be prepared to comment openly and stand by what they say. But also others should not try to second guess or twist the words used.
I agree Sara, but if you are active in politics at any level, then the views you chose to make public are going to be scrutinised. That goes with the job.
I can say what I like on here, and many, I'm sure, think I'm an idiot.
But that doesn't matter because I'm nobody to them. However, if I was the person in charge of their safety, or their taxes, I would expect every word I type to be pored over and rightly so.

If I stood for election on a perfectly sensible manifesto and then let it slip that even though I had no intention of implementing it, my person belief is we should spray paint all the pigeons in the town blue because it would look prettier, then there is a chance that despite my manifesto I would lose because I was clearly barking mad.
Nothing wrong with blue pigeons!

When's the vote?

LSC says...
3:07pm Mon 25 Feb 13

"Nothing wrong with blue pigeons!

When's the vote?"

Don't tempt me! ;)

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree