Comment: Actions speak louder that tweets - or retweets - Dr Frosh (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Comment: Actions speak louder that tweets - or retweets - Dr Frosh
4:00pm Friday 22nd February 2013 in News
By Mike Wright, Chief Reporter
I was a little taken aback when I learned last week that Hertfordshire’s deputy police commissioner, Rachel Frosh, had resigned.
Her departure came in the wake of a self-inflicted media hubbub caused by her retweeting a picture and a quote of Adolf Hitler on Twitter.
The tweet read: “Dear #Socialists embrace your inner #Nazisim”. In the quote attached, from 1927, the Nazi leader describes his party as socialist and expresses his hatred of capitalism. The retweet was provocative and upset some other users of the social media site.
But it seemed more the naive action of a political dilettante who had not adjusted to her elevation as a high-profile public office rather than a blunder necessitating she fall on her sword.
Since her resignation Dr Frosh has penned a number of blogposts and letters explaining the retweet. In her letter to this paper, she seems to be under the misapprehension that all the fuss about her retweet was to do with the media wanting to stifle discussion of the Nazis.
Here I think Dr Frosh may have missed the point.
No one is denying her right to publicly debate the political origins of Nazism. That said, that was not what she was doing with the contentious retweet.
She was disseminating a partisan point aimed at provoking people on the left of the political spectrum by linking them with Hitler.
Personally, I can’t see much in common with any wing of mainstream UK politics and the Third Reich’s psychotic creed of extermination. I also fail to see what is to be gained by trying to link political opponents to such an unequivocally evil movement.
But we are a country that values free speech – unlike Hitler’s Germany. If people want to use Hitler to make crass and insensitive political points, they are free to do so.
The difference is that when Dr Frosh retweeted the picture and quote she was not just a member of Joe Public. She was a senior Hertfordshire politician, wielding influence over a police force that protects more than a million residents. It is natural that they will take more interest in what she does and says.
On her blog, Dr Frosh explained she resigned to avoid causing further problems for her boss – police commissioner David Lloyd – but also as she wanted to answer the questions surrounding the retweet and to retain her freedom to comment on politics.
She said: “So I have therefore resigned – because he (Mr Lloyd) needs to get on with his job, and I want to answer these questions, and also be able to comment on national political issues.”
I find it bizarre Dr Frosh appears to value commenting on national political issues over serving as deputy police commissioner.
I had always assumed (possibly naively) the point of politics and political careers was to achieve things of substance.
Anyone can make their views known on national politics. Few are given the chance to actually put their principles into action.
So if Dr Frosh wants to dedicate herself to fulminating on the political sidelines that is her prerogative.
It is probably the safest place for her and, by the look of it, also the residents of Hertfordshire.
Comments(12)
some bloke
says...
12:41am Sat 23 Feb 13
She lost.
http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Godwin's_la
w
theguitarman
says...
7:01am Sat 23 Feb 13
The simple answer is "engage brain before opening mouth" and think about what you are saying.
theturpster
says...
10:58am Sat 23 Feb 13
Holywell Voter
says...
11:59am Sat 23 Feb 13
miwe2
says...
12:29pm Sat 23 Feb 13
LSC
says...
1:39pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Holywell Voter wrote:There is another policy; having adverts...sorry, sponsorship on things like police cars and other equipment. 'This stab vest is brought to you by Mothercare', or a Tazer with Toys R Us written on it.
My Head Teacher once said "when I open my mouth some fool speaks". Perhaps Dr. Frosh should take note. Many warned that the whole police commissioner election was a waste of resources and so it is proving. The Hertfordshire Police Commissioner so far is known for only two policies - appointing and then sacking a Deputy and the ludicrous proposal that those arrested should pay for their accomodation in the cells. The police commissoner - a tiny vote but a huge salary.
Mohandas
says...
5:59pm Sat 23 Feb 13
theturpster wrote:That's the problem, the masses would really like to have a window into the hearts of the political class. Perhaps in these unguarded moments when they are drunk with power, they do expose themselves as merely concerned with ' disseminating a partisan point aimed at provoking people' and nothing to do with substance or priniciple.
Over the top for a retweet, in my opinion- proves one thing the gullible masses will believe what they read on the internet at face value without really knowing how the person behind it ticks, to judge anything and anyone in 160? (I don't use twatter) characters is a dangerous game.
Sara
says...
11:16pm Sat 23 Feb 13
LSC
says...
12:24pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Sara wrote:I agree Sara, but if you are active in politics at any level, then the views you chose to make public are going to be scrutinised. That goes with the job.
I really don't see why there should be a conflict between being active in local politics and having views on national issues. Everyone should be prepared to comment openly and stand by what they say. But also others should not try to second guess or twist the words used.
I can say what I like on here, and many, I'm sure, think I'm an idiot.
But that doesn't matter because I'm nobody to them. However, if I was the person in charge of their safety, or their taxes, I would expect every word I type to be pored over and rightly so.
If I stood for election on a perfectly sensible manifesto and then let it slip that even though I had no intention of implementing it, my person belief is we should spray paint all the pigeons in the town blue because it would look prettier, then there is a chance that despite my manifesto I would lose because I was clearly barking mad.
Andrew Turpie
says...
2:17pm Mon 25 Feb 13
LSC wrote:Nothing wrong with blue pigeons!
Sara wrote:I agree Sara, but if you are active in politics at any level, then the views you chose to make public are going to be scrutinised. That goes with the job.
I really don't see why there should be a conflict between being active in local politics and having views on national issues. Everyone should be prepared to comment openly and stand by what they say. But also others should not try to second guess or twist the words used.
I can say what I like on here, and many, I'm sure, think I'm an idiot.
But that doesn't matter because I'm nobody to them. However, if I was the person in charge of their safety, or their taxes, I would expect every word I type to be pored over and rightly so.
If I stood for election on a perfectly sensible manifesto and then let it slip that even though I had no intention of implementing it, my person belief is we should spray paint all the pigeons in the town blue because it would look prettier, then there is a chance that despite my manifesto I would lose because I was clearly barking mad.
When's the vote?
LSC
says...
3:07pm Mon 25 Feb 13
When's the vote?"
Don't tempt me! ;)
LSC says...
4:31pm Fri 22 Feb 13
'Should know better' doesn't even come close.