Comment: Election already too close to call, with two years still to go

This week, Labour picked the man they hope will retake Watford for them at the General Election in 2015. Matthew Turmaine, a borough councillor for Holywell, was selected at the weekend to challenge the Conservative incumbent Richard Harrington.

On paper these are the two most important names in the upcoming struggle to represent the town in the House of Commons.

According to the political form book, Watford is solidly a two-horse race. Since 1945 the constituency has swung back and forth between Labour and the Conservatives six times.

The last time Watford could have been called a safe seat was back in 1935 when the Conservatives held the town with 65 per cent of the vote.

Then, in 1945, Labour took the seat on the post-war surge that swept Clement Atlee to power and the constituency has been a dogfight with the Conservatives ever since. After this week’s announcement it would seem voters now know who the principal combatants will be in the 2015.

We are yet to learn who the Liberal Democrat candidate will be for the seat.  Again, on paper, it should be a formality.

Since 2005 the party has surged from around 17 per cent of the Watford vote at General Elections to just over 30 per cent, making the seat a three-way marginal.

But if the party could not capture the parliamentary seat in 2005, in the wake of Iraq, or in 2010, on the crest of Cleggmania, it is hard to conceive how they will do any better in 2015 as the junior partner in a Coalition that has exacted years of austerity on the electorate.

However, in Watford, the Liberal Democrats have a well-developed local political apparatus. One which has helped them take and maintain control of Watford Borough Council over the last decade. It is a political operation that dwarfs anything Labour or the Conservatives have locally.

Recent council election results in the town suggest their local operation has managed to hold up the party’s core vote, even during the party’s lowest ebb in 2011.

And although, come General Election time, the two larger parties’ superior national presence and resources come into play, the person the Liberal Democrats eventually choose to stand in Watford could be the most critical factor in deciding the constituency.

With neither the Conservatives nor Labour making any decisive headway in the polls, the Lib Dems still have a realistic shot at the parliamentary seat.  Even if they are unable to take the seat in 2015, a strong showing from the Liberal Democrats will have ramifications for the other two main parties.

I am sure Mr Harrington will be hoping for a strong Liberal Democrat candidate who can retain some of the voters they took from Labour in 2010. Yet 2015 is still a long way off. If a week is a long time in politics, two years is an aeon.

The only thing that looks certain at the moment is that the Watford constituency will remain a close-run affair.

Readers who submit articles must agree to our terms of use. The content is the sole responsibility of the contributor and is unmoderated. But we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention. If you wish to complain about this article, contact us here

Comments(15)

Hornets number 12 fan says...
12:58pm Fri 1 Mar 13

It can't come soon enough!

MarsLander says...
1:00pm Fri 1 Mar 13

Eastleigh may have changed all that.

None of the three main parties can take anything for granted anymore. Do you hear that Dotty?

What do other people think?

Mike Ribble says...
2:32pm Fri 1 Mar 13

One of the lessons from Eastleigh is the success of the Lib Dems concentration on local issues. That could be their approach in Watford especially if Dorothy Thornhill is their candidate. And it looks as if Matt Turmaine is going to begin by highlighting local issues. Richard Harrington is not what I would call high profile on local issues so may be vulnerable in that area but then he's not high profile on anything really. But that could be an advantage because Watford doesn't do 'shouty'. And that low profile means he's hardly upset anyone - so far.
It's going to be interesting.

Roy Stockdill says...
2:34pm Fri 1 Mar 13

The UKIP vote at Eastleigh was certainly impressive but whether that would be repeated at a general election is another matter. By-elections are notoriously unreliable as an overall pointer and I imagine the Lib-Dem debacle over, firstly, Chris Huhne and then Lord "Groper" Rennard must have had an effect. on their vote.

I must confess I've never heard of Matthew Turmaine, hardly a name to conjure with, but I see he works for the BBC. Well, there's a surprise!

Mohandas says...
5:05pm Fri 1 Mar 13

The next election will be a very different affair as there is almost a complete new set, characters and policies not to mention those with axes to grind. A politician who merely ingratiate oneself with every group in town may not work. Let's hope there are bigger priniples at stake and the voter sees the real person and not simply vote blindly on party colour.

Wacko Jacko says...
8:20pm Fri 1 Mar 13

Roy Stockdill wrote:
The UKIP vote at Eastleigh was certainly impressive but whether that would be repeated at a general election is another matter. By-elections are notoriously unreliable as an overall pointer and I imagine the Lib-Dem debacle over, firstly, Chris Huhne and then Lord "Groper" Rennard must have had an effect. on their vote.

I must confess I've never heard of Matthew Turmaine, hardly a name to conjure with, but I see he works for the BBC. Well, there's a surprise!
I hadn't heard of him either but judging by his feeble letter in today's edition of this august journal, poor chap sounds like he's out of his depth already. Reminds me of that quote about being savaged by a dead sheep. Still he's got two years to go before the election, time to start learning what its all about. Baptism of fire coming up I fear Baaaa!

Wacko Jacko says...
8:20pm Fri 1 Mar 13

Roy Stockdill wrote:
The UKIP vote at Eastleigh was certainly impressive but whether that would be repeated at a general election is another matter. By-elections are notoriously unreliable as an overall pointer and I imagine the Lib-Dem debacle over, firstly, Chris Huhne and then Lord "Groper" Rennard must have had an effect. on their vote.

I must confess I've never heard of Matthew Turmaine, hardly a name to conjure with, but I see he works for the BBC. Well, there's a surprise!
I hadn't heard of him either but judging by his feeble letter in today's edition of this august journal, poor chap sounds like he's out of his depth already. Reminds me of that quote about being savaged by a dead sheep. Still he's got two years to go before the election, time to start learning what its all about. Baptism of fire coming up I fear Baaaa!

Paul Gadd says...
11:36pm Fri 1 Mar 13

I hope a honest independent candidate with moral compass turns up to serve our great town with equality and dignity for all...or is that a pipe dream?

Roy Stockdill says...
10:50am Sat 2 Mar 13

>I hope a honest independent candidate with moral compass turns up to serve our great town with equality and dignity for all...or is that a pipe dream?<

Well, it's a bit naive! With the very rare exception of Martin Bell, who only got elected because 1) he was a national TV figure and 2) the Labour and Lib-Dems agreed not to stand against him, independent candidates have never achieved very much in general elections. Remember Screaming Lord Sutch and the Monster Raving Loony Party?

The wealth and power of the traditional party machines make it virtually impossible that an independent candidate could ever win. You would need someone of the national stature of an Abraham Lincoln or a Martin Luther King and where is Watford going to find somebody like that?

theturpster says...
2:38pm Sat 2 Mar 13

Things won't change, people will always be too busy to vote on election day, will be unhappy with the result and will join Facebook groups to mock the government for the next four years.

Apathy and ignorance is killing the country, along with the government's reluctance to work on behalf of the very small number who actually exercised their democratic right to grace the ballot box with their presence.

Am i correct that the Eastleigh turnout was only just over 50%?

Harry Caine says...
8:47pm Sun 3 Mar 13

Given the £100's thousands piled into Rich Harrington's fighting fund from interested parties outside the Constituency

see:
http://searchthemone
y.com/profile/272

Clearly, Watford had the finest MP money can buy

Roy Stockdill says...
8:59pm Sun 3 Mar 13

And, of course, there are no millionaire socialist MPs are there, Harry? They're all poor boys from council houses, aren't they?

The politics of envy rears its ugly head again, I see.

Roy Stockdill says...
9:50pm Sun 3 Mar 13

Tony Blair, a working class lad, eh Harry?

David and Ed Miliband, working class lads, eh Harry?

Harriet Harman, a working class lass, eh Harry?

Half the Shadow Cabinet from ordinary working class families, eh Harry?

Really, Harry, isn't it about time you grew up, dropped your class warfare stance and recognised that there is absolutely no difference whatsoever between your party leaders and the other lot? Virtually all of them, on all sides and without exception, are from the upper and middle classes and went to public schools and Oxbridge. Where did you go to school, Harry, or is that your problem?

Mike Ribble says...
11:37am Mon 4 Mar 13

You might reasonably expect that in general high achievers in all fields will have come from a relatively affluent background.
But the fact remains that the Watford Tories spend very much more on campaigning than do their rivals. Only the Tories can afford a weekly front page ad on the WO.
Of course they have little option because they have hardly any active members. Door to door canvassing on any scale beyond photo ops is out of the question. Leaflet delivery often has to be paid for. But as we saw last time if you can spend enough you can win.

Roy Stockdill says...
12:12pm Mon 4 Mar 13

>But as we saw last time if you can spend enough you can win.<

Precisely the same thing can be said of football and the Premier League. Those who have the most money can buy the best players and win the title, i.e. the two Manchester clubs with possibly Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool being about the only ones able to compete. The rest are just making up the numbers.

Likewise, it's impossible to become President of the USA without 1) a phenomenal party machine and 2) huge personal wealth. Equally, if you have a wealthy party behind you you can win an election here.

My point was that poor old Harry Caine is whingeing about how unfair it all is, but many of his Labour lot are just as well off and "posh" as the Tories and Lib-Dems they affect to despise for their wealth and background. The term champagne socialists springs to mind. Morever, they had just as many crooked MPs in the expenses scandal!

Why can't people get used to the idea that life is unfair, always has been and realistically probably always will be?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree