Communist party helps fund MP Richard Harrington's China trip

Mr Harrington says he was drumming up Chinese business for the town whilst on the trip

Mr Harrington says he was drumming up Chinese business for the town whilst on the trip

First published in News Watford Observer: Photograph of the Author by , Chief Reporter

The Chinese Communist Party, Barclays bank, Rolls-Royce and oil giant BP all helped fund a trip to China for Watford’s MP Richard Harrington.

The parliamentary register of interests showed the International Department of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China paid for the Conservative backbencher’s £376 accommodation during the three-day stay in January.

It also shows the £3,196 cost of his business class fights were paid for by the three companies via the UK-China Forum Ltd company.

The trip was part of the UK China Leadership Forum, at which Mr Harrington says he was drumming up Chinese business for the town.

The register describes the forum as an "annual event organised by the Great Britain-China Centre to further mutual understanding and strengthen UK-China relations".

Mr Harrington told the Watford Observer that as a result of the visit a Chinese delegation had taken an interest in the BRE research company, based in Garston.

He said: "China is so important for the future and I think Watford needs to be a part of it.

"At the end of the day all I can try and do is promote Watford. All you read about these days is China, China, China, but there is not much action in Watford. I am hoping to change that. Even a small company can export to China."

The updated register of interest also showed in May Mr Harrington received a donation worth £7,500 from Kerry London Ltd, an insurance brokers based in the City of London.

During the time covered by the register Mr Harrington earned £6,764.33 for 34 hours work as director of Eden Group Ltd between January until October 2012.

According to the register Mr Harrington owns shares in two companies Eden PLC Wealth Management and Harvington Properties Ltd.

The register also showed the MP also has joint ownership of five rented buy-to-let properties.

Comments (51)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:15pm Thu 7 Mar 13

theturpster says...

I would gladly pay for a one way...
I would gladly pay for a one way... theturpster
  • Score: 0

7:16pm Thu 7 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

Of no interest to me anyway. I knew he was like this, crazy why people vote for a man like this. You do know that he lives in St Johns Wood (the posh part of London with Private Security) and hasn't spent a day in his life sleeping in Watford. In fact the only time hes in Watford is to cosy up to other businesses !!!!!!!!!
Of no interest to me anyway. I knew he was like this, crazy why people vote for a man like this. You do know that he lives in St Johns Wood (the posh part of London with Private Security) and hasn't spent a day in his life sleeping in Watford. In fact the only time hes in Watford is to cosy up to other businesses !!!!!!!!! mkhan1
  • Score: 0

8:02am Fri 8 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

Hmm ! interesting this. Lets see, he goes to China to hopefully drum up business for Watford. The Chinese pay for his stay and British companies pay for everything else. The UK taxpayer paid nothing. Seems like a good deal to me !

As for the home in which he is supposed to have in St Johns Wood, what about the home in Watford which he has ?, Lives on the plot I think you will find.

Why does theturpster want to buy a one way ticket, doesn't he want to come back. Anyway, have a nice time, when are you going ? Whose paying for your ticket ?
Hmm ! interesting this. Lets see, he goes to China to hopefully drum up business for Watford. The Chinese pay for his stay and British companies pay for everything else. The UK taxpayer paid nothing. Seems like a good deal to me ! As for the home in which he is supposed to have in St Johns Wood, what about the home in Watford which he has ?, Lives on the plot I think you will find. Why does theturpster want to buy a one way ticket, doesn't he want to come back. Anyway, have a nice time, when are you going ? Whose paying for your ticket ? theguitarman
  • Score: 0

9:21am Fri 8 Mar 13

garston tony says...

He's a UK politician visiting one of the most important, in terms of trade and politics, countries in the world. What is so controversial about that? And what is so controversial about his trip being part funded by the Chinese communist party which in effect is the Chinese government?

MKhan1, you knew he was like this did you? What, someone who is visiting one of the most significantly important countries in the world right now in order to try and generate business for the town and country? Surely that’s precisely the type of person to vote for isnt it?
He's a UK politician visiting one of the most important, in terms of trade and politics, countries in the world. What is so controversial about that? And what is so controversial about his trip being part funded by the Chinese communist party which in effect is the Chinese government? MKhan1, you knew he was like this did you? What, someone who is visiting one of the most significantly important countries in the world right now in order to try and generate business for the town and country? Surely that’s precisely the type of person to vote for isnt it? garston tony
  • Score: 0

9:22am Fri 8 Mar 13

garston tony says...

If you're going to grind your axe, at least try and make sense!
If you're going to grind your axe, at least try and make sense! garston tony
  • Score: 0

10:40am Fri 8 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ! mkhan1
  • Score: 0

12:50pm Fri 8 Mar 13

garston tony says...

He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford.

And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?!

And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing.

If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his
He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford. And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?! And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing. If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his garston tony
  • Score: 0

1:15pm Fri 8 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

garston tony wrote:
He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford.

And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?!

And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing.

If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his
So what business did he drum up in China and please tell me what positive direct benefits to the people of Watford. Please expand on "That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford"

You say "And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this" Well please tell me where I have given that impression ?

In relation to "why should he pay out of his own pocket" well he doesn't mind paying out of his pocket before (in fact he has admitted he is so rich he doesn't need to claim expenses). He sings from the roof tops about the fact that he doesn't claim expenses so whats different know ?


Finally his open forums are poorly attended because he has failed to connect with many ordinary people
He appears disinterested when talking to 'ordinary people' and seems out of his comfort zone as well as spending far too much time looking at his phone. Its not their problem, its his, because he will be booted out at the next election!
[quote][p][bold]garston tony[/bold] wrote: He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford. And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?! And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing. If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his[/p][/quote]So what business did he drum up in China and please tell me what positive direct benefits to the people of Watford. Please expand on "That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford" You say "And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this" Well please tell me where I have given that impression ? In relation to "why should he pay out of his own pocket" well he doesn't mind paying out of his pocket before (in fact he has admitted he is so rich he doesn't need to claim expenses). He sings from the roof tops about the fact that he doesn't claim expenses so whats different know ? Finally his open forums are poorly attended because he has failed to connect with many ordinary people He appears disinterested when talking to 'ordinary people' and seems out of his comfort zone as well as spending far too much time looking at his phone. Its not their problem, its his, because he will be booted out at the next election! mkhan1
  • Score: 0

2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

garston tony wrote:
He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford. And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?! And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing. If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his
How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? Notice from the article the section, quote "The trip was part of the UK China Leadership Forum," this implies that several people went on this trip, possibly other MP'S ?

If you look at:

http://www.gbcc.org.
uk/building-partners
hips.aspx

Notice in the last part of the first section it says it was sponspored by Rolls Royce, BP and Barclays. IT was for the whole team which went not just Richard Harrington. It would have been nice if the WO could have made it a bit more verbose.
[quote][p][bold]garston tony[/bold] wrote: He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford. And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?! And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing. If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his[/p][/quote]How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? Notice from the article the section, quote "The trip was part of the UK China Leadership Forum," this implies that several people went on this trip, possibly other MP'S ? If you look at: http://www.gbcc.org. uk/building-partners hips.aspx Notice in the last part of the first section it says it was sponspored by Rolls Royce, BP and Barclays. IT was for the whole team which went not just Richard Harrington. It would have been nice if the WO could have made it a bit more verbose. theguitarman
  • Score: 0

3:37pm Fri 8 Mar 13

garston tony says...

Mkhan, I don’t know, why don’t you ask him at one of his open forums?

But if on this trip he did manage to convince a Chinese firm to invest in Watford or do business with a firm in Watford THAT is a benefit to the town. If he managed to do that for other parts of the country then THAT is in the interest of the country.

Seriously, did you have a moan when David Cameron went to India a few weeks ago. Exactly the same thing, there to drum up business just on a different level. Oh, and guess what David Cameron didn’t dig into his pocket to pay for that trip either. Why do you have such a beef if this was paid for by private enterprise and the government of the country he went to? Those firms obviously hoped that his presence would bring business to them too, and the Chinese government are looking everywhere for places to invest the fortunes they are accumulating. It didn’t cost us a bean, why the problem?!

If he offers the opportunity for people in Watford to speak to him he is fulfilling his duty as an MP, if people don’t want to take up that opportunity sorry but no that is not his fault. Its an open forum, he is there go to it if you have a problem with him.
Mkhan, I don’t know, why don’t you ask him at one of his open forums? But if on this trip he did manage to convince a Chinese firm to invest in Watford or do business with a firm in Watford THAT is a benefit to the town. If he managed to do that for other parts of the country then THAT is in the interest of the country. Seriously, did you have a moan when David Cameron went to India a few weeks ago. Exactly the same thing, there to drum up business just on a different level. Oh, and guess what David Cameron didn’t dig into his pocket to pay for that trip either. Why do you have such a beef if this was paid for by private enterprise and the government of the country he went to? Those firms obviously hoped that his presence would bring business to them too, and the Chinese government are looking everywhere for places to invest the fortunes they are accumulating. It didn’t cost us a bean, why the problem?! If he offers the opportunity for people in Watford to speak to him he is fulfilling his duty as an MP, if people don’t want to take up that opportunity sorry but no that is not his fault. Its an open forum, he is there go to it if you have a problem with him. garston tony
  • Score: 0

3:37pm Fri 8 Mar 13

garston tony says...

The guitarman, I don’t know how well his forums are attended. Please see Mkhan's comments on the matter. Don’t have a go at me either, I think from your comments we're on the same page on this!
The guitarman, I don’t know how well his forums are attended. Please see Mkhan's comments on the matter. Don’t have a go at me either, I think from your comments we're on the same page on this! garston tony
  • Score: 0

3:38pm Fri 8 Mar 13

garston tony says...

As to the WO, they appear to be more interested in generating interest by trying tobe sensationalist and create controversy rather than actual factual reporting
As to the WO, they appear to be more interested in generating interest by trying tobe sensationalist and create controversy rather than actual factual reporting garston tony
  • Score: 0

5:08pm Fri 8 Mar 13

Mohandas says...

mkhan1 wrote:
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
theguitarman says...
2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13
How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question.

Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ![/p][/quote]theguitarman says... 2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13 How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question. Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees. Mohandas
  • Score: 0

6:45pm Fri 8 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

Mohandas wrote:
mkhan1 wrote:
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
theguitarman says...
2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13
How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question.

Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.
Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ?

Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes.

You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject)

xxx
[quote][p][bold]Mohandas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ![/p][/quote]theguitarman says... 2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13 How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question. Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.[/p][/quote]Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ? Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes. You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject) xxx mkhan1
  • Score: 0

6:47pm Fri 8 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

By the way you really need to work on this pathetic website.


http://www.malcolm-m
eerabux.org/
By the way you really need to work on this pathetic website. http://www.malcolm-m eerabux.org/ mkhan1
  • Score: 0

8:21pm Fri 8 Mar 13

gangerman says...

I do not wish to partake in anything Chinese we have enough takeaways in Watford and more recently I was totally disgusted watching a video clip of their treatment of dogs.
It was horrific to see a dog skinned alive and left to die in extreme torture, they are a race that have no ethics whatsoever and until they enter the 21st century they should be left to their own devices without support from this country. Human rights non existant, animal rights non existant.
I do not wish to partake in anything Chinese we have enough takeaways in Watford and more recently I was totally disgusted watching a video clip of their treatment of dogs. It was horrific to see a dog skinned alive and left to die in extreme torture, they are a race that have no ethics whatsoever and until they enter the 21st century they should be left to their own devices without support from this country. Human rights non existant, animal rights non existant. gangerman
  • Score: 0

8:34pm Fri 8 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

mkhan1 wrote:
garston tony wrote: He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford. And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?! And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing. If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his
So what business did he drum up in China and please tell me what positive direct benefits to the people of Watford. Please expand on "That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford" You say "And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this" Well please tell me where I have given that impression ? In relation to "why should he pay out of his own pocket" well he doesn't mind paying out of his pocket before (in fact he has admitted he is so rich he doesn't need to claim expenses). He sings from the roof tops about the fact that he doesn't claim expenses so whats different know ? Finally his open forums are poorly attended because he has failed to connect with many ordinary people He appears disinterested when talking to 'ordinary people' and seems out of his comfort zone as well as spending far too much time looking at his phone. Its not their problem, its his, because he will be booted out at the next election!
mkhan says: "Finally his open forums are poorly attended because he has failed to connect with many ordinary people".

They are widely advertised and you only have to turn up. The problem is a lot of people cannot be bothered. Sorry Malcolm you're just talking sour grapes.
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]garston tony[/bold] wrote: He went to China to drum up business for his constituency and for the country. That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford. And why should he pay out of his own pocket for doing his job?!?! And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this. Well our previous MP had many trips abroad as do many MP's of all colours, all paid for by third parties of one sort of another. That is how things work and you cant single out this MP for doing the same thing. If his open forums are poorly attended then that is the fault of the people that cant be bothered to go. He's giving people an opportunity to meet with him, they are no taking it up. Their problem not his[/p][/quote]So what business did he drum up in China and please tell me what positive direct benefits to the people of Watford. Please expand on "That IS helping the ordinary people of Watford" You say "And you seem to be under the impression that no one else does this" Well please tell me where I have given that impression ? In relation to "why should he pay out of his own pocket" well he doesn't mind paying out of his pocket before (in fact he has admitted he is so rich he doesn't need to claim expenses). He sings from the roof tops about the fact that he doesn't claim expenses so whats different know ? Finally his open forums are poorly attended because he has failed to connect with many ordinary people He appears disinterested when talking to 'ordinary people' and seems out of his comfort zone as well as spending far too much time looking at his phone. Its not their problem, its his, because he will be booted out at the next election![/p][/quote]mkhan says: "Finally his open forums are poorly attended because he has failed to connect with many ordinary people". They are widely advertised and you only have to turn up. The problem is a lot of people cannot be bothered. Sorry Malcolm you're just talking sour grapes. theguitarman
  • Score: 0

9:42pm Fri 8 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1 wrote:
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
Such a myopic view. It's about creating wealth for Watford. If his trips and contacts cultivate such a relationship all the better for all of us.
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ![/p][/quote]Such a myopic view. It's about creating wealth for Watford. If his trips and contacts cultivate such a relationship all the better for all of us. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

10:05pm Fri 8 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1 wrote:
By the way you really need to work on this pathetic website.


http://www.malcolm-m

eerabux.org/
Why don't you upload one .......... Oops, you already have: www.bnp.org.uk
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: By the way you really need to work on this pathetic website. http://www.malcolm-m eerabux.org/[/p][/quote]Why don't you upload one .......... Oops, you already have: www.bnp.org.uk Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

7:42am Sat 9 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1 wrote:
Mohandas wrote:
mkhan1 wrote:
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
theguitarman says...
2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13
How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question.

Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.
Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ?

Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes.

You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject)

xxx
If he's been expelled from a "reject party" and is now a "reject Independent Councillor", then it's a sideways move, which is still a better position to be in than being rejected en masse. If the WCA / Conservatives are a "reject party", as you state, then Park won't vote for them and the "people that matter" will consider an Independent, not because he's an Independent, but based on his past record and his continuing commitment to represent them effectively.

As for obsessions, you seem to have a narsacististic hero worship complex for Andrew (i.e. yourself). It's not about individuals, it's all about deeds and track record. What have you done for Nascot? What have you done for WCA?, why have you turned your back on WCA? Labour's not getting into Park, Conservatives are disorganised. Liberals will probably get in again by default.

As for Malcolm, anything could happen. With anti-Lib Dem and Conservative sentiment at national level, it is likely to flavour voter sentiment locally, even if only sublimally. In the end I would vote for the individual, based on their track record and continuing commitment regardless of political party. If that happened to be a Lib Dem member, which in this case it is not, then so be it. Performance is more important than a Party at local level.

As for Richard ........on this occasion he is at least attempting to do something positive for Watford. That fact should be commended. Perhaps the Chinese human rights record and treatment of animals leaves a lot to be desired, but the West has done its fair share of war atrocities in other countries like Afganistan, Iraq and via the CIA and other agencies elsewhere. As for treatment of animals, talk to an animal rights activist about the track record of UK companies involved in cosmetic testing and see what sort of response you receive. The undercover videos are profoundly disturbing.

The vast majority of posters on this site are better educated and better read than youmAndrew / mkhan1 / Sanity 750 and a number commute, so you don't need to elaborate on St John's Wood's affluence index. Condescension is not becoming.
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mohandas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ![/p][/quote]theguitarman says... 2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13 How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question. Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.[/p][/quote]Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ? Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes. You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject) xxx[/p][/quote]If he's been expelled from a "reject party" and is now a "reject Independent Councillor", then it's a sideways move, which is still a better position to be in than being rejected en masse. If the WCA / Conservatives are a "reject party", as you state, then Park won't vote for them and the "people that matter" will consider an Independent, not because he's an Independent, but based on his past record and his continuing commitment to represent them effectively. As for obsessions, you seem to have a narsacististic hero worship complex for Andrew (i.e. yourself). It's not about individuals, it's all about deeds and track record. What have you done for Nascot? What have you done for WCA?, why have you turned your back on WCA? Labour's not getting into Park, Conservatives are disorganised. Liberals will probably get in again by default. As for Malcolm, anything could happen. With anti-Lib Dem and Conservative sentiment at national level, it is likely to flavour voter sentiment locally, even if only sublimally. In the end I would vote for the individual, based on their track record and continuing commitment regardless of political party. If that happened to be a Lib Dem member, which in this case it is not, then so be it. Performance is more important than a Party at local level. As for Richard ........on this occasion he is at least attempting to do something positive for Watford. That fact should be commended. Perhaps the Chinese human rights record and treatment of animals leaves a lot to be desired, but the West has done its fair share of war atrocities in other countries like Afganistan, Iraq and via the CIA and other agencies elsewhere. As for treatment of animals, talk to an animal rights activist about the track record of UK companies involved in cosmetic testing and see what sort of response you receive. The undercover videos are profoundly disturbing. The vast majority of posters on this site are better educated and better read than youmAndrew / mkhan1 / Sanity 750 and a number commute, so you don't need to elaborate on St John's Wood's affluence index. Condescension is not becoming. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

8:14am Sat 9 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

Correction: "subliminally"
Correction: "subliminally" Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

11:07am Sat 9 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

Razor Sharp wrote:
mkhan1 wrote:
Mohandas wrote:
mkhan1 wrote:
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
theguitarman says...
2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13
How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question.

Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.
Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ?

Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes.

You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject)

xxx
If he's been expelled from a "reject party" and is now a "reject Independent Councillor", then it's a sideways move, which is still a better position to be in than being rejected en masse. If the WCA / Conservatives are a "reject party", as you state, then Park won't vote for them and the "people that matter" will consider an Independent, not because he's an Independent, but based on his past record and his continuing commitment to represent them effectively.

As for obsessions, you seem to have a narsacististic hero worship complex for Andrew (i.e. yourself). It's not about individuals, it's all about deeds and track record. What have you done for Nascot? What have you done for WCA?, why have you turned your back on WCA? Labour's not getting into Park, Conservatives are disorganised. Liberals will probably get in again by default.

As for Malcolm, anything could happen. With anti-Lib Dem and Conservative sentiment at national level, it is likely to flavour voter sentiment locally, even if only sublimally. In the end I would vote for the individual, based on their track record and continuing commitment regardless of political party. If that happened to be a Lib Dem member, which in this case it is not, then so be it. Performance is more important than a Party at local level.

As for Richard ........on this occasion he is at least attempting to do something positive for Watford. That fact should be commended. Perhaps the Chinese human rights record and treatment of animals leaves a lot to be desired, but the West has done its fair share of war atrocities in other countries like Afganistan, Iraq and via the CIA and other agencies elsewhere. As for treatment of animals, talk to an animal rights activist about the track record of UK companies involved in cosmetic testing and see what sort of response you receive. The undercover videos are profoundly disturbing.

The vast majority of posters on this site are better educated and better read than youmAndrew / mkhan1 / Sanity 750 and a number commute, so you don't need to elaborate on St John's Wood's affluence index. Condescension is not becoming.
Dear Friend of Cllr Meerabux. What is your obsession with Cllr to soon to be Mr Meerabux?

Your words are of a ranting incoherent mad man (ha-ha no different to your friend Meerabux).

A side ways move you call it. I would call it a move to the gutter as he was kicked out and expelled as opposed to leaving of his own free will.

As for Nascot I have done nothing for Nascot as I have nothing to do with Nascot. You must have the IQ of an amoeba if you actually think I am Andrew Mortimer !!!!

Finally I would imagine that the vast majority of the people are not as disturbed as you Nabeel x

You made a couple of fatal errors my friend. Never ever underestimate someone else, and 2 Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.

Over to you for some witty repetitive retort !
[quote][p][bold]Razor Sharp[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mohandas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ![/p][/quote]theguitarman says... 2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13 How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question. Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.[/p][/quote]Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ? Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes. You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject) xxx[/p][/quote]If he's been expelled from a "reject party" and is now a "reject Independent Councillor", then it's a sideways move, which is still a better position to be in than being rejected en masse. If the WCA / Conservatives are a "reject party", as you state, then Park won't vote for them and the "people that matter" will consider an Independent, not because he's an Independent, but based on his past record and his continuing commitment to represent them effectively. As for obsessions, you seem to have a narsacististic hero worship complex for Andrew (i.e. yourself). It's not about individuals, it's all about deeds and track record. What have you done for Nascot? What have you done for WCA?, why have you turned your back on WCA? Labour's not getting into Park, Conservatives are disorganised. Liberals will probably get in again by default. As for Malcolm, anything could happen. With anti-Lib Dem and Conservative sentiment at national level, it is likely to flavour voter sentiment locally, even if only sublimally. In the end I would vote for the individual, based on their track record and continuing commitment regardless of political party. If that happened to be a Lib Dem member, which in this case it is not, then so be it. Performance is more important than a Party at local level. As for Richard ........on this occasion he is at least attempting to do something positive for Watford. That fact should be commended. Perhaps the Chinese human rights record and treatment of animals leaves a lot to be desired, but the West has done its fair share of war atrocities in other countries like Afganistan, Iraq and via the CIA and other agencies elsewhere. As for treatment of animals, talk to an animal rights activist about the track record of UK companies involved in cosmetic testing and see what sort of response you receive. The undercover videos are profoundly disturbing. The vast majority of posters on this site are better educated and better read than youmAndrew / mkhan1 / Sanity 750 and a number commute, so you don't need to elaborate on St John's Wood's affluence index. Condescension is not becoming.[/p][/quote]Dear Friend of Cllr Meerabux. What is your obsession with Cllr to soon to be Mr Meerabux? Your words are of a ranting incoherent mad man (ha-ha no different to your friend Meerabux). A side ways move you call it. I would call it a move to the gutter as he was kicked out and expelled as opposed to leaving of his own free will. As for Nascot I have done nothing for Nascot as I have nothing to do with Nascot. You must have the IQ of an amoeba if you actually think I am Andrew Mortimer !!!! Finally I would imagine that the vast majority of the people are not as disturbed as you Nabeel x You made a couple of fatal errors my friend. Never ever underestimate someone else, and 2 Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. Over to you for some witty repetitive retort ! mkhan1
  • Score: 0

12:38pm Sat 9 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

Can anyone remember what this link was all about ?, seems to have been flogged to death now.

Lets all have the weekend off !
Can anyone remember what this link was all about ?, seems to have been flogged to death now. Lets all have the weekend off ! theguitarman
  • Score: 0

4:52pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1 wrote:
Razor Sharp wrote:
mkhan1 wrote:
Mohandas wrote:
mkhan1 wrote:
No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters !

Over to you Tony from Garston !
theguitarman says...
2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13
How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question.

Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.
Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ?

Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes.

You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject)

xxx
If he's been expelled from a "reject party" and is now a "reject Independent Councillor", then it's a sideways move, which is still a better position to be in than being rejected en masse. If the WCA / Conservatives are a "reject party", as you state, then Park won't vote for them and the "people that matter" will consider an Independent, not because he's an Independent, but based on his past record and his continuing commitment to represent them effectively.

As for obsessions, you seem to have a narsacististic hero worship complex for Andrew (i.e. yourself). It's not about individuals, it's all about deeds and track record. What have you done for Nascot? What have you done for WCA?, why have you turned your back on WCA? Labour's not getting into Park, Conservatives are disorganised. Liberals will probably get in again by default.

As for Malcolm, anything could happen. With anti-Lib Dem and Conservative sentiment at national level, it is likely to flavour voter sentiment locally, even if only sublimally. In the end I would vote for the individual, based on their track record and continuing commitment regardless of political party. If that happened to be a Lib Dem member, which in this case it is not, then so be it. Performance is more important than a Party at local level.

As for Richard ........on this occasion he is at least attempting to do something positive for Watford. That fact should be commended. Perhaps the Chinese human rights record and treatment of animals leaves a lot to be desired, but the West has done its fair share of war atrocities in other countries like Afganistan, Iraq and via the CIA and other agencies elsewhere. As for treatment of animals, talk to an animal rights activist about the track record of UK companies involved in cosmetic testing and see what sort of response you receive. The undercover videos are profoundly disturbing.

The vast majority of posters on this site are better educated and better read than youmAndrew / mkhan1 / Sanity 750 and a number commute, so you don't need to elaborate on St John's Wood's affluence index. Condescension is not becoming.
Dear Friend of Cllr Meerabux. What is your obsession with Cllr to soon to be Mr Meerabux?

Your words are of a ranting incoherent mad man (ha-ha no different to your friend Meerabux).

A side ways move you call it. I would call it a move to the gutter as he was kicked out and expelled as opposed to leaving of his own free will.

As for Nascot I have done nothing for Nascot as I have nothing to do with Nascot. You must have the IQ of an amoeba if you actually think I am Andrew Mortimer !!!!

Finally I would imagine that the vast majority of the people are not as disturbed as you Nabeel x

You made a couple of fatal errors my friend. Never ever underestimate someone else, and 2 Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.

Over to you for some witty repetitive retort !
If I am Malcolm's friend, then you are probably Cllr Steve Johnson. No one else would defend Andrew Mortimer in such an 'affectionate' manner.

If you believe I am Nabil, then publish my full name here or are you concerned about defamation?

Good to know you consider yourself to be an experienced fool. It saves me insulting you.

I don't care if Malcolm is re-elected or not. It has no impact on me and I have nothing invested in the outcome either way.

Since when were we friends? Why would I be friends with any of the old has been WCA members or, for that matter, a member of the Conservative Party? For the record, I'm a floating voter. I vote for those that have a demonstrable track record and/or demonstrate commitment to the local residents.

Now labelled as an ethnic minority (obviously .... anyone associating with Malcolm must be an ethnic minority) ...... so be it, Nabil
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Razor Sharp[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mohandas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: No axe to grind Tony, but the growing consensus is that this multi-millionaire seems more interested in trips abroad and big businesses then helping ordinary people in Watford. Why would he be sponsored by the communist party when he has more than enough money to pay his own way? Its symptomatic of what is happening within the party. His open forums in Watford are poorly attended and the only people that go are his supporters ! Over to you Tony from Garston ![/p][/quote]theguitarman says... 2:00pm Fri 8 Mar 13 How exactly do you know his open forums are badly attended ? I assume you have been to one to take a head count ? like you I am confused. Don't be fooled and you are asking the right question. Mkhan 1, sanity, etc trades under different schizophrenic names depending on his anger management and when he wants to pretend to be ethnic. He is the failed rather sad ex Tory Cllr Andrew Mortimer who lost 700 votes in safe Nascot after the Ian Oakley criminal case of harrassment against the Liberals. They are self on self destruct as shown by the recent collapse in wards after all political parties publicly humiliated them in Full Council when they foolishly attempted to remove a hardworking cllr from committees.[/p][/quote]Cllr Malcolm Meerabux. You really are rather bitter after being expelled from a reject party. I wonder how many votes you will lose in Park ? Whats it like being a reject Independent Councillor looking for scrapes. You seem to have an obsession with Andrew Mortimer. Funny thing is that he could lose a thousand votes for all I care and he would still be a 1000 times the man you are. Funny really that the people that matter never rejected him but on the other you always be Persona Non Grata (aka reject) xxx[/p][/quote]If he's been expelled from a "reject party" and is now a "reject Independent Councillor", then it's a sideways move, which is still a better position to be in than being rejected en masse. If the WCA / Conservatives are a "reject party", as you state, then Park won't vote for them and the "people that matter" will consider an Independent, not because he's an Independent, but based on his past record and his continuing commitment to represent them effectively. As for obsessions, you seem to have a narsacististic hero worship complex for Andrew (i.e. yourself). It's not about individuals, it's all about deeds and track record. What have you done for Nascot? What have you done for WCA?, why have you turned your back on WCA? Labour's not getting into Park, Conservatives are disorganised. Liberals will probably get in again by default. As for Malcolm, anything could happen. With anti-Lib Dem and Conservative sentiment at national level, it is likely to flavour voter sentiment locally, even if only sublimally. In the end I would vote for the individual, based on their track record and continuing commitment regardless of political party. If that happened to be a Lib Dem member, which in this case it is not, then so be it. Performance is more important than a Party at local level. As for Richard ........on this occasion he is at least attempting to do something positive for Watford. That fact should be commended. Perhaps the Chinese human rights record and treatment of animals leaves a lot to be desired, but the West has done its fair share of war atrocities in other countries like Afganistan, Iraq and via the CIA and other agencies elsewhere. As for treatment of animals, talk to an animal rights activist about the track record of UK companies involved in cosmetic testing and see what sort of response you receive. The undercover videos are profoundly disturbing. The vast majority of posters on this site are better educated and better read than youmAndrew / mkhan1 / Sanity 750 and a number commute, so you don't need to elaborate on St John's Wood's affluence index. Condescension is not becoming.[/p][/quote]Dear Friend of Cllr Meerabux. What is your obsession with Cllr to soon to be Mr Meerabux? Your words are of a ranting incoherent mad man (ha-ha no different to your friend Meerabux). A side ways move you call it. I would call it a move to the gutter as he was kicked out and expelled as opposed to leaving of his own free will. As for Nascot I have done nothing for Nascot as I have nothing to do with Nascot. You must have the IQ of an amoeba if you actually think I am Andrew Mortimer !!!! Finally I would imagine that the vast majority of the people are not as disturbed as you Nabeel x You made a couple of fatal errors my friend. Never ever underestimate someone else, and 2 Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. Over to you for some witty repetitive retort ![/p][/quote]If I am Malcolm's friend, then you are probably Cllr Steve Johnson. No one else would defend Andrew Mortimer in such an 'affectionate' manner. If you believe I am Nabil, then publish my full name here or are you concerned about defamation? Good to know you consider yourself to be an experienced fool. It saves me insulting you. I don't care if Malcolm is re-elected or not. It has no impact on me and I have nothing invested in the outcome either way. Since when were we friends? Why would I be friends with any of the old has been WCA members or, for that matter, a member of the Conservative Party? For the record, I'm a floating voter. I vote for those that have a demonstrable track record and/or demonstrate commitment to the local residents. Now labelled as an ethnic minority (obviously .... anyone associating with Malcolm must be an ethnic minority) ...... so be it, Nabil Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

5:00pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

theguitarman wrote:
Can anyone remember what this link was all about ?, seems to have been flogged to death now.

Lets all have the weekend off !
Yes ..... MP received sponsorship ...... he attempted to generate Chinese business interest in Watford ....... some people didn't like him for doing that, others didn't like the Chinese track record on human and animal rights, there was a bitchy exchange between pro and anti-Malcolm supporters and mkhan1 attempted to exercise his brain, which was probably exorcised at birth.
[quote][p][bold]theguitarman[/bold] wrote: Can anyone remember what this link was all about ?, seems to have been flogged to death now. Lets all have the weekend off ![/p][/quote]Yes ..... MP received sponsorship ...... he attempted to generate Chinese business interest in Watford ....... some people didn't like him for doing that, others didn't like the Chinese track record on human and animal rights, there was a bitchy exchange between pro and anti-Malcolm supporters and mkhan1 attempted to exercise his brain, which was probably exorcised at birth. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

5:31pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1, let me know when your PMS has passed. Perhaps then your submissions will be at least semi-coherent.
mkhan1, let me know when your PMS has passed. Perhaps then your submissions will be at least semi-coherent. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

5:33pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

By the way, 'PMS' here has the usual meaning and also a second meaning: Post-Malcolm Stress.
By the way, 'PMS' here has the usual meaning and also a second meaning: Post-Malcolm Stress. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

7:36pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Mohandas says...

Smeagol, ETHNIC M KHAN, Sanity, Bluesky etc What's wrong with you attention seeking pair of silly plums today? Anger management not working or anxiously thinking what a sad, losing, dispirited, increasingly lonely team you make in happily losing hundreds of votes in Leggatts and Nascot but don’t worry just maybe some voter will adopt you one day. If you need another tongue lashing then you should have seen Paul Ince today.

I'd call you fools, but even they serve a purpose.

Advice line tip – Steve and Andrew, you have a very serious acute inferiority complex (perhaps some failure in connecting with voters, employment or school) and it is fully justified. Your very tired efforts are best left in the toilet. You could always meet me and some locals at Vicarage Rd.
Smeagol, ETHNIC M KHAN, Sanity, Bluesky etc What's wrong with you attention seeking pair of silly plums today? Anger management not working or anxiously thinking what a sad, losing, dispirited, increasingly lonely team you make in happily losing hundreds of votes in Leggatts and Nascot but don’t worry just maybe some voter will adopt you one day. If you need another tongue lashing then you should have seen Paul Ince today. I'd call you fools, but even they serve a purpose. Advice line tip – Steve and Andrew, you have a very serious acute inferiority complex (perhaps some failure in connecting with voters, employment or school) and it is fully justified. Your very tired efforts are best left in the toilet. You could always meet me and some locals at Vicarage Rd. Mohandas
  • Score: 0

1:01am Sun 10 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

I hope Richard manages to broker some Chinese business for Watford.

What we know so far: Dotty's potty, WCA is on life support, with one year to make a recovery, WBC is virtually broke, Andrew Mortimer and Steve Johnson are like Laurel and Hardy, minus the clever scripts, Lib Dems are sitting back and watching WCA and the rest of the Conservatives go to the wall, Labour has ring side seats for the melt down and the Greens are doing their own thing under the radar.

As for Malcolm, WCA probably perceive him as the new Sheriff in "Blazing Saddles", Labour might view him as Django in "Django Unchained" and the Lib Dems are too busy enjoying their emerging spoils from the WCA melt down to care.

I haven't seen a copy of "Out of Touch" / "In Touch" lately. Come on WCA get your act together or have no representation left in Watford.
I hope Richard manages to broker some Chinese business for Watford. What we know so far: Dotty's potty, WCA is on life support, with one year to make a recovery, WBC is virtually broke, Andrew Mortimer and Steve Johnson are like Laurel and Hardy, minus the clever scripts, Lib Dems are sitting back and watching WCA and the rest of the Conservatives go to the wall, Labour has ring side seats for the melt down and the Greens are doing their own thing under the radar. As for Malcolm, WCA probably perceive him as the new Sheriff in "Blazing Saddles", Labour might view him as Django in "Django Unchained" and the Lib Dems are too busy enjoying their emerging spoils from the WCA melt down to care. I haven't seen a copy of "Out of Touch" / "In Touch" lately. Come on WCA get your act together or have no representation left in Watford. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

4:00pm Sun 10 Mar 13

sallywatford says...

I think the comments just reveal the poor state of the Conservatives in Watford.

We have tory activists openly criticising their MP - MKhan1 who appears to be either Steve Johnson or Andrew Mortimer is very scathing.

MKhan1 also has venom for Malcolm Meerabux who seems to be either Mohandas or Razor Sharp (incidentally is sympathetic to the Tory MP and not so much the conservative party in Watford, but has equal hate for mkhan1).

The level of detail possessed by mkhan1 and mohandas, razor sharp about the internal machinations of conservative party clearly indicate they are involved with the party.

I hope the WO is noting this spat not so much the Johnson/Mortimer Vs Meerabux one, but the attack on Richard Harrington by Tory members within Watford.
I think the comments just reveal the poor state of the Conservatives in Watford. We have tory activists openly criticising their MP - MKhan1 who appears to be either Steve Johnson or Andrew Mortimer is very scathing. MKhan1 also has venom for Malcolm Meerabux who seems to be either Mohandas or Razor Sharp (incidentally is sympathetic to the Tory MP and not so much the conservative party in Watford, but has equal hate for mkhan1). The level of detail possessed by mkhan1 and mohandas, razor sharp about the internal machinations of conservative party clearly indicate they are involved with the party. I hope the WO is noting this spat not so much the Johnson/Mortimer Vs Meerabux one, but the attack on Richard Harrington by Tory members within Watford. sallywatford
  • Score: 0

8:58pm Sun 10 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

Razor Sharp wrote:
mkhan1, let me know when your PMS has passed. Perhaps then your submissions will be at least semi-coherent.
Sorry I didn't answer you back but I have better things to on a Saturday Evening than answer your sad, repetitive and embarrassing retorts.You must be really sad and must be really lonely to have Malcolm Meerabux on your mind (I bet you always got picked last !). Lay with dogs and you end up with fleas !

Stop humiliating yourself! and by te way thanks for correcting my spelling of nabeel to nabil. My hunch was right. The humiliation of it all tut tut.....
[quote][p][bold]Razor Sharp[/bold] wrote: mkhan1, let me know when your PMS has passed. Perhaps then your submissions will be at least semi-coherent.[/p][/quote]Sorry I didn't answer you back but I have better things to on a Saturday Evening than answer your sad, repetitive and embarrassing retorts.You must be really sad and must be really lonely to have Malcolm Meerabux on your mind (I bet you always got picked last !). Lay with dogs and you end up with fleas ! Stop humiliating yourself! and by te way thanks for correcting my spelling of nabeel to nabil. My hunch was right. The humiliation of it all tut tut..... mkhan1
  • Score: 0

9:04pm Sun 10 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

sallywatford wrote:
I think the comments just reveal the poor state of the Conservatives in Watford.

We have tory activists openly criticising their MP - MKhan1 who appears to be either Steve Johnson or Andrew Mortimer is very scathing.

MKhan1 also has venom for Malcolm Meerabux who seems to be either Mohandas or Razor Sharp (incidentally is sympathetic to the Tory MP and not so much the conservative party in Watford, but has equal hate for mkhan1).

The level of detail possessed by mkhan1 and mohandas, razor sharp about the internal machinations of conservative party clearly indicate they are involved with the party.

I hope the WO is noting this spat not so much the Johnson/Mortimer Vs Meerabux one, but the attack on Richard Harrington by Tory members within Watford.
Sally I can 100% assure you that I am neither Cllr Mortimer or Cllr Johnson. I can also 100% assure you that I am not a Tory party activist or member. Please point out the level of detail that I have?
[quote][p][bold]sallywatford[/bold] wrote: I think the comments just reveal the poor state of the Conservatives in Watford. We have tory activists openly criticising their MP - MKhan1 who appears to be either Steve Johnson or Andrew Mortimer is very scathing. MKhan1 also has venom for Malcolm Meerabux who seems to be either Mohandas or Razor Sharp (incidentally is sympathetic to the Tory MP and not so much the conservative party in Watford, but has equal hate for mkhan1). The level of detail possessed by mkhan1 and mohandas, razor sharp about the internal machinations of conservative party clearly indicate they are involved with the party. I hope the WO is noting this spat not so much the Johnson/Mortimer Vs Meerabux one, but the attack on Richard Harrington by Tory members within Watford.[/p][/quote]Sally I can 100% assure you that I am neither Cllr Mortimer or Cllr Johnson. I can also 100% assure you that I am not a Tory party activist or member. Please point out the level of detail that I have? mkhan1
  • Score: 0

9:09pm Sun 10 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

Dear Mohandas I repeat I am not a member of the Conservative party and I oppose them at a local and national level. Osbourne needs to invest not just austerity measures. I have a right to comment on the MP's trip to China.
I have heard many bits and pieces through the grapevine mostly about you being disturbed. The Watford Conservatives are a joke. It wouldn't surprise you if they don’t beg you aka Meerabux to come back. Maybe Nabil can carry your bags lol !!!!!!!!
Dear Mohandas I repeat I am not a member of the Conservative party and I oppose them at a local and national level. Osbourne needs to invest not just austerity measures. I have a right to comment on the MP's trip to China. I have heard many bits and pieces through the grapevine mostly about you being disturbed. The Watford Conservatives are a joke. It wouldn't surprise you if they don’t beg you aka Meerabux to come back. Maybe Nabil can carry your bags lol !!!!!!!! mkhan1
  • Score: 0

9:34pm Sun 10 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

Can we stop for a while, this getting very silly! It has totally lost the plot.
Can we stop for a while, this getting very silly! It has totally lost the plot. theguitarman
  • Score: 0

2:24am Mon 11 Mar 13

Mohandas says...

theguitarman wrote:
Can we stop for a while, this getting very silly! It has totally lost the plot.
Others have implored angry Andrew and dejected Steve to desist but they seem to want to be tongue lashed especially by Razor. Sad that we have to put up with one liners from limited Andrew Mortimer and inferior Steve Johnson who use so many different names and strangely even pretend to be ethnic and oddly deny they are members of Wat Con Assoc which they have wrecked and typical of insincere politicians, looking to put the blame someone else. Steve J has told everyone he has now been scrapped as Chair of WCA and wonder why? Is it because he asked Labour if he could follow them on policy ?
[quote][p][bold]theguitarman[/bold] wrote: Can we stop for a while, this getting very silly! It has totally lost the plot.[/p][/quote]Others have implored angry Andrew and dejected Steve to desist but they seem to want to be tongue lashed especially by Razor. Sad that we have to put up with one liners from limited Andrew Mortimer and inferior Steve Johnson who use so many different names and strangely even pretend to be ethnic and oddly deny they are members of Wat Con Assoc which they have wrecked and typical of insincere politicians, looking to put the blame someone else. Steve J has told everyone he has now been scrapped as Chair of WCA and wonder why? Is it because he asked Labour if he could follow them on policy ? Mohandas
  • Score: 0

9:43am Mon 11 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1 wrote:
Razor Sharp wrote:
mkhan1, let me know when your PMS has passed. Perhaps then your submissions will be at least semi-coherent.
Sorry I didn't answer you back but I have better things to on a Saturday Evening than answer your sad, repetitive and embarrassing retorts.You must be really sad and must be really lonely to have Malcolm Meerabux on your mind (I bet you always got picked last !). Lay with dogs and you end up with fleas !

Stop humiliating yourself! and by te way thanks for correcting my spelling of nabeel to nabil. My hunch was right. The humiliation of it all tut tut.....
So much venom Cllr Johnson. You should save it for your campaigns. I stated the usual spelling for Nabil, since you insisted in attaching that name to me.

If anyone reads back through your postings, your identity becomes apparent.

My postings are for my entertainment in between work commitments. Policy drafting can be dry; and before you critique, I have my own businesses, so am not wasting anyone else's money.

I don't have Malcolm on my mind. You're the one who sought to attack him after attacking Richard.

I suspect that you are bitter after being dumped as Chair of WCA, according to Mohandas. After your extensive postings, defence of WCA, insight, it is now too late for you to deny your WCA routes. Perhaps you should resign before being expelled like Malcolm.

As for Richard, he, in my opinion has the charisma of a domestic house brick. I watched him once at his open forum, or whatever he calls it. Once was more than enough for me. Notwithstanding this and politics aside, if he manages to bring in Chinese business to Watford, which is what this thread was originally about before you decided to adopt a virtual scorched earth policy on it, he should be applauded, supported and congratulated. Creating wealth is difficult.

So what if he is financially robust and courts big business, isn't that what we expect of our MPs in such fiscally challenging times, regardless of political persuasion.

Sallywatford's observations are correct. Some members of WCA are openly attacking their own Party. Now, after being outed as Andrew and Steve, they are concerned that they could be ejected from the Party, as they should. They lack intellectual rigour, have little to add and the WCA needs an injection of intellect before it completely implodes on itself.

I have no political allegiance, having supported all of the major parties, depending on the calibre of the candidate. If someone can add value to Watford and represent residents' interests then they should be considered.

As for "humiliating myself", I did that when I decided to engage in 'dialogue', if one can call it that, with you.

I have no interest in 'laying' with you and getting fleas. No idea why you keep putting yourself down in this way. First, you claimed to be an experienced fool and now a dog with fleas, what next, a Conservative Councillor standing for re-election?
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Razor Sharp[/bold] wrote: mkhan1, let me know when your PMS has passed. Perhaps then your submissions will be at least semi-coherent.[/p][/quote]Sorry I didn't answer you back but I have better things to on a Saturday Evening than answer your sad, repetitive and embarrassing retorts.You must be really sad and must be really lonely to have Malcolm Meerabux on your mind (I bet you always got picked last !). Lay with dogs and you end up with fleas ! Stop humiliating yourself! and by te way thanks for correcting my spelling of nabeel to nabil. My hunch was right. The humiliation of it all tut tut.....[/p][/quote]So much venom Cllr Johnson. You should save it for your campaigns. I stated the usual spelling for Nabil, since you insisted in attaching that name to me. If anyone reads back through your postings, your identity becomes apparent. My postings are for my entertainment in between work commitments. Policy drafting can be dry; and before you critique, I have my own businesses, so am not wasting anyone else's money. I don't have Malcolm on my mind. You're the one who sought to attack him after attacking Richard. I suspect that you are bitter after being dumped as Chair of WCA, according to Mohandas. After your extensive postings, defence of WCA, insight, it is now too late for you to deny your WCA routes. Perhaps you should resign before being expelled like Malcolm. As for Richard, he, in my opinion has the charisma of a domestic house brick. I watched him once at his open forum, or whatever he calls it. Once was more than enough for me. Notwithstanding this and politics aside, if he manages to bring in Chinese business to Watford, which is what this thread was originally about before you decided to adopt a virtual scorched earth policy on it, he should be applauded, supported and congratulated. Creating wealth is difficult. So what if he is financially robust and courts big business, isn't that what we expect of our MPs in such fiscally challenging times, regardless of political persuasion. Sallywatford's observations are correct. Some members of WCA are openly attacking their own Party. Now, after being outed as Andrew and Steve, they are concerned that they could be ejected from the Party, as they should. They lack intellectual rigour, have little to add and the WCA needs an injection of intellect before it completely implodes on itself. I have no political allegiance, having supported all of the major parties, depending on the calibre of the candidate. If someone can add value to Watford and represent residents' interests then they should be considered. As for "humiliating myself", I did that when I decided to engage in 'dialogue', if one can call it that, with you. I have no interest in 'laying' with you and getting fleas. No idea why you keep putting yourself down in this way. First, you claimed to be an experienced fool and now a dog with fleas, what next, a Conservative Councillor standing for re-election? Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

10:35am Mon 11 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

Mohandas wrote:
theguitarman wrote:
Can we stop for a while, this getting very silly! It has totally lost the plot.
Others have implored angry Andrew and dejected Steve to desist but they seem to want to be tongue lashed especially by Razor. Sad that we have to put up with one liners from limited Andrew Mortimer and inferior Steve Johnson who use so many different names and strangely even pretend to be ethnic and oddly deny they are members of Wat Con Assoc which they have wrecked and typical of insincere politicians, looking to put the blame someone else. Steve J has told everyone he has now been scrapped as Chair of WCA and wonder why? Is it because he asked Labour if he could follow them on policy ?
Mohandas, are you referring to the proposed cut in councillor expenses when considering following the Labour lead?

Weren't there letters from Andrew Mortimer and Cllr Johnson in the WO last week? I recall reading a few lines of the letters and falling asleep.

They are as boring in their official postings as they are in postings here, despite the various pseudonyms.

I can imagine them sitting together at each other's homes over a cup of tea and attempting to draft semi-coherent letters to the WO - campaigning through the back door!

Cllr Johnson should forget about taking a cut in his expenses and should be cut from the Party instead. An experienced fool and a dog with fleas, based on his own admissions here, should not be allowed to contaminate any further.
[quote][p][bold]Mohandas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]theguitarman[/bold] wrote: Can we stop for a while, this getting very silly! It has totally lost the plot.[/p][/quote]Others have implored angry Andrew and dejected Steve to desist but they seem to want to be tongue lashed especially by Razor. Sad that we have to put up with one liners from limited Andrew Mortimer and inferior Steve Johnson who use so many different names and strangely even pretend to be ethnic and oddly deny they are members of Wat Con Assoc which they have wrecked and typical of insincere politicians, looking to put the blame someone else. Steve J has told everyone he has now been scrapped as Chair of WCA and wonder why? Is it because he asked Labour if he could follow them on policy ?[/p][/quote]Mohandas, are you referring to the proposed cut in councillor expenses when considering following the Labour lead? Weren't there letters from Andrew Mortimer and Cllr Johnson in the WO last week? I recall reading a few lines of the letters and falling asleep. They are as boring in their official postings as they are in postings here, despite the various pseudonyms. I can imagine them sitting together at each other's homes over a cup of tea and attempting to draft semi-coherent letters to the WO - campaigning through the back door! Cllr Johnson should forget about taking a cut in his expenses and should be cut from the Party instead. An experienced fool and a dog with fleas, based on his own admissions here, should not be allowed to contaminate any further. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

10:44am Mon 11 Mar 13

garston tony says...

gangerman wrote:
I do not wish to partake in anything Chinese we have enough takeaways in Watford and more recently I was totally disgusted watching a video clip of their treatment of dogs. It was horrific to see a dog skinned alive and left to die in extreme torture, they are a race that have no ethics whatsoever and until they enter the 21st century they should be left to their own devices without support from this country. Human rights non existant, animal rights non existant.
Gangerman if you truly don’t want to partake of anything Chinese you're going to find your life difficult immediately seeing as how so much stuff we buy in the country is made there. And that my dear is precisely why we do need to trade with them, so much of our money ends up in China and in order for our own economy to do anything we need them to send it back in terms of buying what little products still manufacture here or many services for which we are quite good at or by investing in UK firms.

As to the many other comments, not going to bother
[quote][p][bold]gangerman[/bold] wrote: I do not wish to partake in anything Chinese we have enough takeaways in Watford and more recently I was totally disgusted watching a video clip of their treatment of dogs. It was horrific to see a dog skinned alive and left to die in extreme torture, they are a race that have no ethics whatsoever and until they enter the 21st century they should be left to their own devices without support from this country. Human rights non existant, animal rights non existant.[/p][/quote]Gangerman if you truly don’t want to partake of anything Chinese you're going to find your life difficult immediately seeing as how so much stuff we buy in the country is made there. And that my dear is precisely why we do need to trade with them, so much of our money ends up in China and in order for our own economy to do anything we need them to send it back in terms of buying what little products still manufacture here or many services for which we are quite good at or by investing in UK firms. As to the many other comments, not going to bother garston tony
  • Score: 0

10:54am Mon 11 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

Richard Harrington, you should take anti-rabies shots and have some flea powder to hand. It looks like mkhan1 is preparing for a savage attack.

How does it feel to have some of your own Party out for your blood, and the only people coming to your defence are those not involved with the Party?

Even Caesar didn't have it this bad.

Revive the economic fortunes of Watford and you might get my vote and the vote of many others who want MPs to make a difference to their economic and social well-being, or, like Cllr Johnson, I, together with many others, might follow the Labour lead.
Richard Harrington, you should take anti-rabies shots and have some flea powder to hand. It looks like mkhan1 is preparing for a savage attack. How does it feel to have some of your own Party out for your blood, and the only people coming to your defence are those not involved with the Party? Even Caesar didn't have it this bad. Revive the economic fortunes of Watford and you might get my vote and the vote of many others who want MPs to make a difference to their economic and social well-being, or, like Cllr Johnson, I, together with many others, might follow the Labour lead. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

10:58am Mon 11 Mar 13

mkhan1 says...

I am really happy that I have been able to stir things up for the local Conservatives. You’re all a complete shower and have nothing to offer the people of Watford.
The sooner you’re kicked out nationally the better for us all.
My work is done.
I am really happy that I have been able to stir things up for the local Conservatives. You’re all a complete shower and have nothing to offer the people of Watford. The sooner you’re kicked out nationally the better for us all. My work is done. mkhan1
  • Score: 0

11:03am Mon 11 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

Razor Sharp wrote:
Richard Harrington, you should take anti-rabies shots and have some flea powder to hand. It looks like mkhan1 is preparing for a savage attack.

How does it feel to have some of your own Party out for your blood, and the only people coming to your defence are those not involved with the Party?

Even Caesar didn't have it this bad.

Revive the economic fortunes of Watford and you might get my vote and the vote of many others who want MPs to make a difference to their economic and social well-being, or, like Cllr Johnson, I, together with many others, might follow the Labour lead.
Hey Richard what a great idea, lets see, why not organise a jobs fair with local businesses involved, wossat? You've done that several times!

OK then how about going to China ALL expenses paid, to see if you can drum up business for Watford and the UK? What? No....... you've done as well, we'll blow me, I've just read all the above and only just realised what this post was actually about!
[quote][p][bold]Razor Sharp[/bold] wrote: Richard Harrington, you should take anti-rabies shots and have some flea powder to hand. It looks like mkhan1 is preparing for a savage attack. How does it feel to have some of your own Party out for your blood, and the only people coming to your defence are those not involved with the Party? Even Caesar didn't have it this bad. Revive the economic fortunes of Watford and you might get my vote and the vote of many others who want MPs to make a difference to their economic and social well-being, or, like Cllr Johnson, I, together with many others, might follow the Labour lead.[/p][/quote]Hey Richard what a great idea, lets see, why not organise a jobs fair with local businesses involved, wossat? You've done that several times! OK then how about going to China ALL expenses paid, to see if you can drum up business for Watford and the UK? What? No....... you've done as well, we'll blow me, I've just read all the above and only just realised what this post was actually about! theguitarman
  • Score: 0

11:27am Mon 11 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

mkhan1 wrote:
I am really happy that I have been able to stir things up for the local Conservatives. You’re all a complete shower and have nothing to offer the people of Watford.
The sooner you’re kicked out nationally the better for us all.
My work is done.
PMS!
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: I am really happy that I have been able to stir things up for the local Conservatives. You’re all a complete shower and have nothing to offer the people of Watford. The sooner you’re kicked out nationally the better for us all. My work is done.[/p][/quote]PMS! Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

11:38am Mon 11 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

theguitarman wrote:
Razor Sharp wrote:
Richard Harrington, you should take anti-rabies shots and have some flea powder to hand. It looks like mkhan1 is preparing for a savage attack.

How does it feel to have some of your own Party out for your blood, and the only people coming to your defence are those not involved with the Party?

Even Caesar didn't have it this bad.

Revive the economic fortunes of Watford and you might get my vote and the vote of many others who want MPs to make a difference to their economic and social well-being, or, like Cllr Johnson, I, together with many others, might follow the Labour lead.
Hey Richard what a great idea, lets see, why not organise a jobs fair with local businesses involved, wossat? You've done that several times!

OK then how about going to China ALL expenses paid, to see if you can drum up business for Watford and the UK? What? No....... you've done as well, we'll blow me, I've just read all the above and only just realised what this post was actually about!
Well done!
[quote][p][bold]theguitarman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Razor Sharp[/bold] wrote: Richard Harrington, you should take anti-rabies shots and have some flea powder to hand. It looks like mkhan1 is preparing for a savage attack. How does it feel to have some of your own Party out for your blood, and the only people coming to your defence are those not involved with the Party? Even Caesar didn't have it this bad. Revive the economic fortunes of Watford and you might get my vote and the vote of many others who want MPs to make a difference to their economic and social well-being, or, like Cllr Johnson, I, together with many others, might follow the Labour lead.[/p][/quote]Hey Richard what a great idea, lets see, why not organise a jobs fair with local businesses involved, wossat? You've done that several times! OK then how about going to China ALL expenses paid, to see if you can drum up business for Watford and the UK? What? No....... you've done as well, we'll blow me, I've just read all the above and only just realised what this post was actually about![/p][/quote]Well done! Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

11:46am Mon 11 Mar 13

Mohandas says...

Nice light relief story for all from WFC and perhaps what's gone wrong with society. Wat Con Assoc isn't it nice to see someone idolised by supporters .
Colin West's mullet says...
12:56pm Sat 9 Mar 13

of all the fantastic bits of WFC news I've seen over the last year, this one has made me happier than most.

Absolutely delighted for him, in an age of cynicism and mercenary footballers, LD is a true gentleman and an absolute credit to the club and the game.

A Watford legend worthy of the title, and one of the few footballers you'd be happy with your kids looking up to.

Well done Lloyd, thoroughly deserved.
Let's hear it for the unsing heroes of this world and hope that Doyley never has the misfortune to bump into Johnson and Mortimer because they would bin him
Nice light relief story for all from WFC and perhaps what's gone wrong with society. Wat Con Assoc isn't it nice to see someone idolised by supporters . Colin West's mullet says... 12:56pm Sat 9 Mar 13 of all the fantastic bits of WFC news I've seen over the last year, this one has made me happier than most. Absolutely delighted for him, in an age of cynicism and mercenary footballers, LD is a true gentleman and an absolute credit to the club and the game. A Watford legend worthy of the title, and one of the few footballers you'd be happy with your kids looking up to. Well done Lloyd, thoroughly deserved. Let's hear it for the unsing heroes of this world and hope that Doyley never has the misfortune to bump into Johnson and Mortimer because they would bin him Mohandas
  • Score: 0

11:58am Mon 11 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

Mohandas wrote:
Nice light relief story for all from WFC and perhaps what's gone wrong with society. Wat Con Assoc isn't it nice to see someone idolised by supporters .
Colin West's mullet says...
12:56pm Sat 9 Mar 13

of all the fantastic bits of WFC news I've seen over the last year, this one has made me happier than most.

Absolutely delighted for him, in an age of cynicism and mercenary footballers, LD is a true gentleman and an absolute credit to the club and the game.

A Watford legend worthy of the title, and one of the few footballers you'd be happy with your kids looking up to.

Well done Lloyd, thoroughly deserved.
Let's hear it for the unsing heroes of this world and hope that Doyley never has the misfortune to bump into Johnson and Mortimer because they would bin him
You on the right page ? Planet or what ?
[quote][p][bold]Mohandas[/bold] wrote: Nice light relief story for all from WFC and perhaps what's gone wrong with society. Wat Con Assoc isn't it nice to see someone idolised by supporters . Colin West's mullet says... 12:56pm Sat 9 Mar 13 of all the fantastic bits of WFC news I've seen over the last year, this one has made me happier than most. Absolutely delighted for him, in an age of cynicism and mercenary footballers, LD is a true gentleman and an absolute credit to the club and the game. A Watford legend worthy of the title, and one of the few footballers you'd be happy with your kids looking up to. Well done Lloyd, thoroughly deserved. Let's hear it for the unsing heroes of this world and hope that Doyley never has the misfortune to bump into Johnson and Mortimer because they would bin him[/p][/quote]You on the right page ? Planet or what ? theguitarman
  • Score: 0

12:02pm Mon 11 Mar 13

theguitarman says...

mkhan1 wrote:
I am really happy that I have been able to stir things up for the local Conservatives. You’re all a complete shower and have nothing to offer the people of Watford.
The sooner you’re kicked out nationally the better for us all.
My work is done.
No mkhan your work is not done, there are some drains blocked in the high street, so get back to your day job!
[quote][p][bold]mkhan1[/bold] wrote: I am really happy that I have been able to stir things up for the local Conservatives. You’re all a complete shower and have nothing to offer the people of Watford. The sooner you’re kicked out nationally the better for us all. My work is done.[/p][/quote]No mkhan your work is not done, there are some drains blocked in the high street, so get back to your day job! theguitarman
  • Score: 0

1:58pm Mon 11 Mar 13

garston tony says...

Razorsharp, as much as trips like the one our MP one can drum up business for our town ultimately Watfords fortunes are tied in with the nations fortunes and that you can not lay at the feet of our MP or any other.

Mkhan1, you're it seems believing your own press. I wouldn’t think you've had much of an impact, not like that many people will have read your comments.
Razorsharp, as much as trips like the one our MP one can drum up business for our town ultimately Watfords fortunes are tied in with the nations fortunes and that you can not lay at the feet of our MP or any other. Mkhan1, you're it seems believing your own press. I wouldn’t think you've had much of an impact, not like that many people will have read your comments. garston tony
  • Score: 0

4:36pm Tue 12 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

garston tony wrote:
Razorsharp, as much as trips like the one our MP one can drum up business for our town ultimately Watfords fortunes are tied in with the nations fortunes and that you can not lay at the feet of our MP or any other.

Mkhan1, you're it seems believing your own press. I wouldn’t think you've had much of an impact, not like that many people will have read your comments.
Obviously, but if someone is attempting to drum up business they should not be attacked for it, like here.

Perhaps mkhan1 can join Malcolm and compliment him by dressing up as a pineapple.
[quote][p][bold]garston tony[/bold] wrote: Razorsharp, as much as trips like the one our MP one can drum up business for our town ultimately Watfords fortunes are tied in with the nations fortunes and that you can not lay at the feet of our MP or any other. Mkhan1, you're it seems believing your own press. I wouldn’t think you've had much of an impact, not like that many people will have read your comments.[/p][/quote]Obviously, but if someone is attempting to drum up business they should not be attacked for it, like here. Perhaps mkhan1 can join Malcolm and compliment him by dressing up as a pineapple. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

4:45pm Wed 13 Mar 13

MarsLander says...

What a ridiculous petty spat between posters. If they are members of the WCA (or ex-members) then they should take a step back, grow up and get over it.

Pathetic doesn't even come close.

I can't be the only one who feels embarrassed to be reading pathetic claim and counter-claim.

We should all be fighting the common enemy - the LibDems that are ruining our town. Instead, you choose to fight among yourselves in the most childish way.

It's just embarrassing and you are helping keep the LibDems in power by showing how you are unworthy of voting for.
What a ridiculous petty spat between posters. If they are members of the WCA (or ex-members) then they should take a step back, grow up and get over it. Pathetic doesn't even come close. I can't be the only one who feels embarrassed to be reading pathetic claim and counter-claim. We should all be fighting the common enemy - the LibDems that are ruining our town. Instead, you choose to fight among yourselves in the most childish way. It's just embarrassing and you are helping keep the LibDems in power by showing how you are unworthy of voting for. MarsLander
  • Score: 0

4:48pm Wed 13 Mar 13

MarsLander says...

BTW,

our MP, like him or not, has been to China to try to drum up trade.

Give him some credit for doing it at no expense to the taxpayer.
BTW, our MP, like him or not, has been to China to try to drum up trade. Give him some credit for doing it at no expense to the taxpayer. MarsLander
  • Score: 0

7:36pm Thu 14 Mar 13

Razor Sharp says...

MarsLander wrote:
BTW,

our MP, like him or not, has been to China to try to drum up trade.

Give him some credit for doing it at no expense to the taxpayer.
EXACTLY!!!

Give credit where credit is due.
[quote][p][bold]MarsLander[/bold] wrote: BTW, our MP, like him or not, has been to China to try to drum up trade. Give him some credit for doing it at no expense to the taxpayer.[/p][/quote]EXACTLY!!! Give credit where credit is due. Razor Sharp
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree