County politicians to look at Watford-wide 20mph limit (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Hertfordshire County Council to look at plans for 20mph limit in town
3:20pm Tuesday 19th March 2013 in News
By Mike Wright, Chief Reporter
Watford politicians press for 20mph limit in town
Ambitions to turn Watford into a 20mph town have been given a jump start as county politicians are set to look at the proposals.
Hertfordshire County Council will examine the possibility of implementing blanket 20mph zones on Thursday.
Thus far the ruling Conservative administration at county hall has rejected proposals to cut the speed limit in all no major roads in Watford, describing the scheme as "not appropriate" for the town.
However in December when North Herts District Council voted for a town-wide 20mph scheme in Hitchin, the county council explored the feasibility of such a scheme.
The move has triggered a special meeting of the county’s overview and scrutiny committee, which will hear from campaigners for the Watford scheme including borough councillor Peter Jeffree and Kevin Ambrose from 20’s Plenty Watford.
Politicians in Watford have been pressing for a town-wide scheme since all four borough council parties voted for in March last year.
Comments(14)
Mohandas
says...
4:42pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Could we not do the basics eg get rid of all the unwanted, discarded, irrelevant, bent, damaged, unmaintained, street signs or abandoned poles?
What about potholes, cracked pavements, deep cleaning of drains, clearing the tons of litter from streets, alleyways, etc?
Can we not prosecute those that damage the pavements usually because of building work?
Do we need to focus on what is in front of us before our litter strewn roads resemble a third world country.
LSC
says...
5:02pm Tue 19 Mar 13
But when the road changed, the double arrows were replaced with a 'No Entry' and the Give Way was simply removed.
But the lights that illuminated both sides were not. For 20 YEARS the grey back of the No Entry signs have been lit up every night. 20 years. They have even replaced the bulbs when they failed.
The streetlights go off quite early here, but the back of the signs are illuminated all night, every night.
And these people want me to believe they know what they are doing?
MarsLander
says...
5:29pm Tue 19 Mar 13
LSC wrote:This is what happens, particularly around election time, when the need to be seen to be doing something outweighs the need to do the right thing.
Look at the story below. The roads are in a terrible state and they want to spend money on something new?
Signage and enforcement alone of a 20mph limit could pay to fix 1,000 potholes.
We keep getting told WE ARE SKINT. Why waste money on a scheme that nobody knows will make any difference to anything anyway?
Idiots.
Idiots? Yes, that about sums them up.
Wacko Jacko
says...
5:48pm Tue 19 Mar 13
gusgreen
says...
6:04pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Wacko Jacko wrote:Improve the safety of the streets by Fixing them that's more important than a silly PC stunt that has not proved to be safer but in a lot of cases has lead to more accidents!
On the contrary dear commentators, what could be more important than improving the safety of our residential streets and improving the quality of life for all residents? 20's Plenty for me.
Nick Lincoln
says...
7:21pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Wacko Jacko wrote:Let's take your condescension to it's ultimate destination: no cars on the road, at any time. What could be safer? What, by your logic, could improve "the quality of life for all residents" more than having no vehicles moving on the roads?
On the contrary dear commentators, what could be more important than improving the safety of our residential streets and improving the quality of life for all residents? 20's Plenty for me.
Show me the crashes, injuries and fatalities that occur in Watford at speeds between 20 mph and 30 mph and I'll show you a campaign that has no empirical evidence to support it. Show me the widespread popular support for this that exists OUTSIDE of Town Hall and I'll show you a bunch of third-rate nannies who simply can't resist the siren call of "something must be done" when the reality screams "Sod off, and leave us alone."
BTW the chance of doing 30 mph in most parts of Watford remains a forlorn pipe dream, thanks to potholes, bus lanes, traffic lights at every conceivable junction or roundabout and sheer traffic volume.
Nick Lincoln
UKIP Watford
mrn_wfc
says...
8:37pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Nick Lincoln wrote:UKIP are making sense. May need to see the manifesto of the party.
Wacko Jacko wrote:Let's take your condescension to it's ultimate destination: no cars on the road, at any time. What could be safer? What, by your logic, could improve "the quality of life for all residents" more than having no vehicles moving on the roads?
On the contrary dear commentators, what could be more important than improving the safety of our residential streets and improving the quality of life for all residents? 20's Plenty for me.
Show me the crashes, injuries and fatalities that occur in Watford at speeds between 20 mph and 30 mph and I'll show you a campaign that has no empirical evidence to support it. Show me the widespread popular support for this that exists OUTSIDE of Town Hall and I'll show you a bunch of third-rate nannies who simply can't resist the siren call of "something must be done" when the reality screams "Sod off, and leave us alone."
BTW the chance of doing 30 mph in most parts of Watford remains a forlorn pipe dream, thanks to potholes, bus lanes, traffic lights at every conceivable junction or roundabout and sheer traffic volume.
Nick Lincoln
UKIP Watford
Hornets number 12 fan
says...
10:17pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Wacko Jacko wrote:You sure do have an apt name there!
On the contrary dear commentators, what could be more important than improving the safety of our residential streets and improving the quality of life for all residents? 20's Plenty for me.
Andrew1963
says...
11:01pm Tue 19 Mar 13
MarsLander
says...
7:38am Wed 20 Mar 13
Wacko Jacko wrote:Yes, I can see how this would appeal to those who find it difficult to look beyond the cover of a book.
On the contrary dear commentators, what could be more important than improving the safety of our residential streets and improving the quality of life for all residents? 20's Plenty for me.
johnhornet
says...
8:37am Wed 20 Mar 13
There is a new policy of not doing temporary repairs to potholes, so they are fixed permanently instead. What this means in practice is that the potholes stay/get worse as it takes much longer to schedule permanent repairs.
garston tony
says...
11:07am Wed 20 Mar 13
Secondly whilst I dont know how many accidents occur in Watford but it has ben proven that if a pedestrian is hit at 20mph they have a far higher chance of being less injured than being hit at 30mph. I would say that whilst the cost of putting up new speed signs etc may be the same as fixing 1000 potholes the cost saved in reduced accident rates and injuries incurred when they do happen would probably pay for far far more potholes to be fixed.
Sometimes investing money in something can actually save more money elsewhere.
I'm not swayed either way on the actual need but just thought i'd put the above two points out there
garston tony
says...
11:13am Wed 20 Mar 13
LSC says...
3:52pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Signage and enforcement alone of a 20mph limit could pay to fix 1,000 potholes.
We keep getting told WE ARE SKINT. Why waste money on a scheme that nobody knows will make any difference to anything anyway?
Idiots.