Willows Farm Village is sued over injury

Children's farm is sued over injury Children's farm is sued over injury

The Bank of England's in-house physiotherapist has launched a massive compensation claim after breaking his back in a trampolining accident at a children's theme park.

Paul Edwards, 40, who tends to the niggles and aches of Sir Mervyn King and the other bankers who steer the nation's financial ship, as well as practicing in Chorleywood, suffered a fractured spine during a family visit to Willows Farm Village and Park, near St Albans, in May last year.

Mr Edwards, of Germain Street, Chesham, says he was attempting to bounce "normally" at the popular farm-themed leisure park and petting zoo when he struck his back, due to the trampoline being "positioned too close to the ground below it."

He is suing the owners of the attraction - Bowmans Farms Ltd, of Coursers Lane, London Colney - who advertise that visitors to their park will experience "acres of fun" - for a minimum of £300,000 in damages.

In a High Court writ, Mr Edwards, who runs his own physiotherapy clinic with his wife Nicky, as well as working for the Bank of England since 2008, says he was "using a trampoline which he was permitted to use and was using it in a normal manner" when he suffered the "serious injury" to his back.

The writ states that Mr Edwards had an annual membership to Willows Farm Village and that the accident happened during a family visit to the theme park on a Sunday.

"During a family visit to the premises, Mr Edwards was using a trampoline when, after jumping upwards and then landing on the stretched fabric of the trampoline, he struck the ground beneath the fabric and suffered a serious injury to his back," the writ says.

"His injuries were caused by negligence or breach of an implied term of the contract that the trampolining facilities would be safe for him to use," it is alleged.

Mr Edwards also claims that staff at the theme park had "positioned the trampoline on a slope...so that it was too close to the ground below it, failed to place the trampoline on level ground (and) failed to ensure that there was sufficient distance between the stretched fabric component of the trampoline and the ground below it."

The writ states that, as a result of the accident, Mr Edwards suffered "a serious injury to his back including a wedge compression fracture of the 12th thoracic vertebra" for which he is seeking "a lump sum award of damages".

In their defence to the action, Tanja Neuhof, for Bowmans Farms Ltd, says that they "admit primary liability" for Mr Edwards' accident, but "reserve the right to allege contributory negligence against him".

Miss Neuhof adds that "no admissions are made as to the injury suffered by Mr Edwards as a result of the accident" and that "no admissions are made as to the cause or causes of his current medical complaints".

Comments(11)

sffca says...
12:38pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Typical! Compensation claims rule.

!say says...
12:54pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Thought it was for kids! Stupid man! Let's just hope he doesn't ever deputise for Mervyn King we are in a bad enough state as it is without some overgrown school kid running fast & loose with the country's cash.....you would think he'd be to embarrassed to sue.....shame on you Mr Edwards.

MaryWatford says...
1:11pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Hope he doesnt get a penny! I take my Grandkids to Willows and we love it. I never get on the rides (except the tractor ride) due to my age. This chap should have known better. Go away and dont ruin this farm for everyone else!

barnet123 says...
1:25pm Fri 22 Mar 13

He was probably too fat for the trampoline but clearly that is the fault of the farm! I've been there and it's clearly for kids ... His annual membership should be revoked, we don't need his kind hanging around donkeys and goats

bhattyclease says...
1:44pm Fri 22 Mar 13

"...a wedge compression fracture of the 12th thoracic vertebra"???

Really?

That's funny, because there are only 10 vertebra. Case dismissed.

See ya!

AlpinaB5 says...
1:54pm Fri 22 Mar 13

If you've only got 10 thoracic vetebrae, then you're obviously not a human, and you've problably got 4 ribs less too. Humans have 12 thoractic vetebrae!

Wiki is s good starting point.

MarsLander says...
4:13pm Fri 22 Mar 13

Compensation culture. Let's hope he doesn't get a single penny unless Willows were doing something dangerous.

chocco says...
10:36pm Sat 23 Mar 13

Was it his wife that diagnosed it and wrote the injury report ? Hmmm one does have to wonder.

mc77 says...
11:17pm Sun 24 Mar 13

I'm sorry - but if he was allowed to go on the trampolines (which are supervised by the staff) they are thereby saying that they are suitable for adult use. I would have thought in today's litigious society, that a large attraction like Willows would have a notice saying "unsuitable for adult use" or indeed a weight restriction. There are plenty of young teenagers with the equivalent weight of an adult. I'm no expert in these matters, but I would imagine that this would be a legal requirement. If he'd tried to squeeze himself onto an unsupervised swing boat ride and complained that it broke and he suffered an injury - that's a very different matter. Trampolining is not an exclusively child-based activity and if the staff supervising these trampolines did not make that clear, then I'm afraid, Willows must accept some liability in this matter. A broken back does tend to smart a little, and tends to interfere somewhat with one's day to day life!

garston tony says...
10:17am Mon 25 Mar 13

The farm seem to agree that the trampoline was badly set up. However I do tend to agree with their counter argument that Mr Edwards could and probably indeed should have noted some of the issues before being so keen to jump on

I wouldnt be suprised if the court find in his favour but limit damages due to his own negligence in the matter.

LSC says...
2:01pm Mon 25 Mar 13

Agreed; the man is obviously no fool, and if he didn't see the potential danger, how could he expect the staff to?
Of course, the staff are more familiar with the equipment and its limits so will take the rap, but he has to shoulder some of the blame.
Trampolines are dangerous, everyone knows that. Playing cricket on the M1 is also dangerous, but do we need signs telling us not to do so, or that if we do, it is at our own risk?

He chose to take part in a potentially dangerous activity, and he got hurt. Naturally, that is now someone else's fault.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree