Application to modify location of Bushey 'eruv' poles

Application to modify location of Bushey 'eruv' poles

Application to modify location of Bushey 'eruv' poles

First published in News Watford Observer: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

The developers of the eruv in Bushey have submitted an application to Harrow Council for amendments.

The application has been submitted on behalf of Bushey United Synagogue, and relates to a minor variation of the previous consent, which was granted on September 11 last year.

The variation involves the omission of one site, and the relocation of another to further south along Common Road to the south side of Tanglewood Close.

In August last year Hertsmere Borough Council approved the controversial planning application to erect steel poles in 25 locations across Bushey, connected by fishing wire.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:53am Thu 6 Mar 14

Popeonarope says...

Adapt your religion not my environment!
Lunatics at work...See here for details.

http://www.watfordob
server.co.uk/news/10
657785.Final_seal_of
_approval_for_comple
te_Bushey_eruv/

http://www.watfordob
server.co.uk/news/10
621191.Synagogue_del
ighted_with_eruv_dec
ision/

http://www.watfordob
server.co.uk/news/10
616279.Politicians_u
nanimously_approve_c
ontroversial_Bushey_
Jewish_eruv_boundary
/

Etc.
Adapt your religion not my environment! Lunatics at work...See here for details. http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/10 657785.Final_seal_of _approval_for_comple te_Bushey_eruv/ http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/10 621191.Synagogue_del ighted_with_eruv_dec ision/ http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/10 616279.Politicians_u nanimously_approve_c ontroversial_Bushey_ Jewish_eruv_boundary / Etc. Popeonarope
  • Score: 20

8:33pm Thu 6 Mar 14

LSC says...

I'm a little confused. This is supposed to be a continuous boundary, that's the point of it. If one of the proposed sites is now going to be omitted completely, won't that leave a gap that it was designed to fill?
I'm a little confused. This is supposed to be a continuous boundary, that's the point of it. If one of the proposed sites is now going to be omitted completely, won't that leave a gap that it was designed to fill? LSC
  • Score: 7

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree