Bushey residents celebrate planning refusal for 'completely inappropriate and unacceptable' flats

Bushey residents celebrate planning refusal for 'completely inappropriate and unacceptable' flats

Bushey residents celebrate planning refusal for 'completely inappropriate and unacceptable' flats

First published in News

A council has unanimously voted to reject plans to demolish four houses and build 22 two bedroom apartments in Bushey, saying the application was an "over development" and would have a "unacceptable impact on the street scene".

Shanly Homes submitted plans to Hertsmere Borough council last year to demolish 203-209 Merry Hill Road and replace them with two three storey blocks containing 22 two bedroom flats with 29 parking spaces, and a bin and recycling store.

Before the planning meeting last month more than 50 residents met with Hertsmere MP James Clappison to oppose the plans.

Alan Bobroff of Linnet Close organised the meeting and spoke against the application at the planning meeting on behalf of the Merry Hill Residents’ Association and a number of other local residents.

He said: "We believe this proposal constitutes a gross overdevelopment of the site. The two large blocks will be completely out of character with the local area."

Other objections included the loss of sunlight to neighbouring homes, the lack of parking, the loss of green space and traffic concerns.

Mr Bobroff concluded by asking the council to "reject the inappropriate application to fit a quart into a pint pot."

At the meeting at Hertsmere Borough Council’s offices, Bushey Heath Councillor Brenda Batten spoke against the application as community advocate, calling the application "completely inappropriate and unacceptable".

Mrs Batten, who lives near the proposed development, said that she had received 117 letters of objection to the proposals.

She said: "I cannot think that this application has any merit what-so-ever. It is completely out of character with the green and open nature of the surrounding area of the bird estate, as it is so called."

Mrs Batten also noted concerts traffic because the access road is used by parents of three neighbouring schools.

She continued: "I’m amazed that the highways have not commented more on this proposal. If anyone knows this road they would realise any more vehicles would be catastrophic. At the moment two vehicles cannot safely pass at the narrow end of the road particularly when cars are parked there.

"The development would be out of character, cause overlooking, have a detrimental effect on neighbours and be an overdevelopment of the site."

Hertsmere Borough Council voted to refuse the application based on it being an "overdevelopment of the site that would have an unacceptable impact on the street scene".

A report issued said: "The proposal would have an unacceptable living environment for future occupiers.

"It would also have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring residential occupiers."

No one spoke in favour the application at the meeting. Speaking aftewards Mr Bobroff said residents were "thrilled to bits" that the application was refused.

The 75-year-old said: "It is marvellous that it has been turned down, and we are all over the moon.

"The residents have really come together to oppose the application and save this lovely area, at the end of the day we all want the same thing.

"We are delighted to see democracy works in Hertsmere."

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:00am Thu 10 Apr 14

LSC says...

"We are delighted to see democracy works in Hertsmere."

Yes, because we are all equal. Just some are more equal than others.

The last meeting about Hertsmere planning I attended had a lot more than 50 objectors. The MP was too busy to attend, as was the Head of Planning who stated afterwards they wouldn't have gone anyway because they don't like the majority of residents much. The police were there though; more police than I've seen in Bushey for years at any one time (3). They tried to turn people away from the meeting, and there was quite a fuss.

The application was still passed though, despite the overwhelming objections. Good old democracy, eh?
"We are delighted to see democracy works in Hertsmere." Yes, because we are all equal. Just some are more equal than others. The last meeting about Hertsmere planning I attended had a lot more than 50 objectors. The MP was too busy to attend, as was the Head of Planning who stated afterwards they wouldn't have gone anyway because they don't like the majority of residents much. The police were there though; more police than I've seen in Bushey for years at any one time (3). They tried to turn people away from the meeting, and there was quite a fuss. The application was still passed though, despite the overwhelming objections. Good old democracy, eh? LSC
  • Score: 0

2:02pm Thu 10 Apr 14

bushey10 says...

Planning applications are considered on planing grounds and not on local feelings, that said, there must have been strong planning grounds in this case other wise it would have been approved.

Sad to say democratic views or hear say are not accepted as a argument against the national planning framework.
Planning applications are considered on planing grounds and not on local feelings, that said, there must have been strong planning grounds in this case other wise it would have been approved. Sad to say democratic views or hear say are not accepted as a argument against the national planning framework. bushey10
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree