Report this comment
  • "
    drunkenduck wrote:
    NOOOOO. Leave the building alone, if it does happen the Developers & Council should be shoot or hanged or both. It's the last standing "house" in the road, as history shows the whole road was a roll of houses until the greedy, pathetic developers destroyed the area with those "UGLY" office blocks. Secondly these only a few building around Watford that is still standing and haven't been ruined. And that is part of Watford past history, so it should be SAVED. As these only a few remaining buildings in Watford that shows it's Watford's history. But saying that, the council doesn't seem to promote Watford history and all it cares about is building more ugly buildings and destroying Watford past history - how pathetic. If anyone ask about Watford's history bet only a few will know the true answers?
    There are two houses painted white near the Junction - or there used to be! The inside of the old house has nothing left of character and there is an ugly extension on the rear. The office blocks started turning up just before the WW2, and since the 50's virtually all the houses and the church has gone, so i expect whatever the council decides a government planning inspector wwill approve. The rights of property owners to do with their land as they wish tend to trump the wishes of neighbours. It is a nice enough building, but there are plenty better in Nascot from this era. i suspect it is the fact that it is one of the last that will count aginst it rather than for it. As said above the County council have it in their power to lease the building to another user, but i expect they are already banking on the money from redevelopment. Where is the registry office nowadays?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Renewed bid to demolish Victorian villa after 'oppressive and monolithic' plans previously rejected

Watford Observer: Renewed bid to demolish Victorian villa after 'oppressive and monolithic' plans previously rejected Renewed bid to demolish Victorian villa after 'oppressive and monolithic' plans previously rejected

Developers are making a renewed bid to demolish a Victorian villa in central Watford to make way for a large flats and office development.

Hertfordshire County Council and V Fund Limited have submitted plans for a smaller building to replace the former registry office in 36 Clarendon Road.

The original proposal was rejected by politicians in March on the grounds it was too large and bulky for the location, which is next to the Estcourt Conservation area.

Watford Observer:

The old plans

The original plans ran into opposition from people in the area who complained the planned development was "oppressive and monolithic" and would dwarf nearby homes.

Councillors for the area also argued the building should be preserved due to its historical value to the town and said it could be used for a new school in the town centre.

The new proposals are due to come to Watford Council’s development control committee on Thursday and planning officials have recommended them for approval.

The revised design sees the number of flats reduced from 36 to 34, removing two penthouse flats to make the design down from seven storeys to six.

Watford Observer:

The new plans

A report on the proposal said: "This application proposes an amended design for the residential element which deletes the two roof level flats and introduces new materials to break up the visual dominance of the brickwork on the east facing elevation. It is considered that this revised design overcomes the reason for refusal and is acceptable."

The current building was built around 1865 and was the home of Watford’s MP between 1918 and 1943, Sir Dennis Herbert. In more recent times it was the town’s registry office.

Planners said although the building was reminiscent of how Clarendon Road used to look, it was now incongruous against the more modern office blocks.

They also said it was unlikely the building would find a new use in its current state.

The report said: "The proposal will result in the total loss of the locally listed Victorian villa on the site and thereby substantial harm to this asset. However, the building itself is not considered to be of significant merit due to its limited architectural and historic interest.

"It is also not able to provide the quality or quantity of modern office floorspace required by the designation of Clarendon Road as the town’s prime office area. Its potential use is very limited and the likelihood of it being brought back into use is consequently very low."

The report added that the developers had agreed to make at least 35 per cent of the flats affordable and to pay more than £150,000 towards local infrastructure, including a new children’s play area.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree