Sarratt wedding venue owners treated 'unfairly' by district council

Sarratt wedding venue owners treated 'unfairly' by district council

Sarratt wedding venue owners treated 'unfairly' by district council

First published in News Watford Observer: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Reporter

The owners of a Sarratt estate used for weddings have criticised the way they have been treated by Three Rivers after an application to keep a marquee, which can house more than 300 people, was rejected.

Years of feuding with the district council have left owners of the Micklefield Hall, Anna and Jamie Rankin, feeling despondent and unfairly treated.

The pair have been running events from the 350-acre Sarratt Road estate for 15 years.

In 2002, the couple began talks with the council about saving the estate’s Tithe Barn, which dates back to the 16th century.

Applications to renovate the dilapidated barn were thrown out. Consequently, the couple took the case to appeal.

In 2009 the pair was successful and won the public inquiry, including costs against the council.

However, a condition was put in place that the marquee, which has been used for weddings, would have to be taken down - much to the couple’s annoyance.

Mr Ranking said he and his wife have encountered obstacles at every turn in their discussions with the council.

He added: "The council has just stood in our way every time and I just really don’t know why.

"We have received no complaints in the past five years and the reason we’ve had the application turned down was nothing to do with noise or traffic, it was adverse impact on the Green Belt.

"What really grates is that there are farms nearby which put these great big marquees up every weekend and play music which goes straight across the area. It’s not fair.

"We believe the decisions the council has made are misplaced and it’s a shame and pity. I really think they need more balance in their decision making."

Weddings are not the only events held at the venue, many charities also hold functions there free-of-charge.

Kevin Snow, spokesman for Three Rivers, said the planning permission which was granted in 2009 at appeal sought to limit the impact of the use on the Green Belt and nearby residents by restricting the number of events to no more than 57 days a year with a maximum of 200 guests in the barn.

Currently, wedding receptions and events can be held in the marquee for 28 days a year with up to 320 people.

However, Mrs Rankin said they sometimes would require more space for larger weddings, particularly Jewish and Asian occasions which are traditionally bigger affairs.

Mr Snow said: "We need to balance the interests of local businesses alongside the interests of their neighbours and impact on local amenities and the Green Belt. 

"The conditions were placed by the independent planning inspectorate. The district council refused an application last year to remove previous conditions which limited temporary events outside of the barn.

"We refused this for the same reasons above as highlighted by the planning inspectorate in 2009 at appeal."

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:10am Fri 6 Jun 14

garston tony says...

There is a difference between tents being put up and taken down and a tent being left in place permanently. I dont think their point about other events around them stands, i'm sure they could out a tent up and take it down again as and when needed like everyone else does around them.
There is a difference between tents being put up and taken down and a tent being left in place permanently. I dont think their point about other events around them stands, i'm sure they could out a tent up and take it down again as and when needed like everyone else does around them. garston tony
  • Score: 2

10:01am Fri 6 Jun 14

UKBEARS says...

More use of this location would no doubt cause traffic disruption in the local area.
An example was last autumn when we approached our home at around 9.30PM we were within 20 yards of the entrance to our Close when we were blocked by total traffic gridlock caused by SIX huge trucks belonging to a TV company totally filling our road when the were apparently lost trying to access Micklefield Hall site. We had to wait for over an HOUR during which time I personally suffered much verbal abuse from other road users and spent time advising others how they might escape via Loudwater Lane to the Rickmansworth Road.
It appears that they were given faulty directions and all 6 vehicles followed like sheep into a residential cul-de-sac!
Greater use of Micklefield Hall for events such as these larger weddings can only lead to similar incidents.
More use of this location would no doubt cause traffic disruption in the local area. An example was last autumn when we approached our home at around 9.30PM we were within 20 yards of the entrance to our Close when we were blocked by total traffic gridlock caused by SIX huge trucks belonging to a TV company totally filling our road when the were apparently lost trying to access Micklefield Hall site. We had to wait for over an HOUR during which time I personally suffered much verbal abuse from other road users and spent time advising others how they might escape via Loudwater Lane to the Rickmansworth Road. It appears that they were given faulty directions and all 6 vehicles followed like sheep into a residential cul-de-sac! Greater use of Micklefield Hall for events such as these larger weddings can only lead to similar incidents. UKBEARS
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree