Boundary Way estate plans approved by Watford Borough Council

Boundary Way estate plans approved by Watford Borough Council

Boundary Way estate plans approved by Watford Borough Council

First published in News Watford Observer: Photograph of the Author by , Chief Reporter

Controversial plans to build more than 50 new homes on a cramped Garston estate have taken a big step forward.

Watford Borough Council’s development control committee approved Watford Community Housing Trust's proposals for its side of the Boundary Way estate last night.

The move means the final say on the plans will be Three Rivers District Council’s as it is the authority for the Western end of the estate.

The plans to build 55 new homes in two and three-storey buildings have been criticised by residents as being "back-to-back concrete" and looking "East German and Russian".

The trust proposals are to demolish two blocks of flats and a shop as well as 15 rows of lock-up garages to make way for the new homes.

As well as the new homes the trust also promises to build a "community facility", a community garden and to refurbish two play areas.

The trust also plans to create open parking courts and on-street parking bays.

At the meeting last night estate resident, Catherine Birch, told the committee that the people of Boundary Way already "live in concrete" but were proud of their community.

She said the people there thought the trust plans were cramming too many new homes into the area with not enough parking.

Ms Birch finished her address with a plea to the committee, saying: "The decision you make tonight is a decision we residents of Boundary Way will have to live with for the rest of our lives. Please make the right decision."

Euan Barr, the trust’s head of new business, said the scheme represented the housing association’s commitment to regenerating the estate.

He said: "We have produced a scheme after much consultation, which we think enhances the estate and the affordable housing supply."

During the ensuing debate councillors said their site visit had shown them that the controversial aspects of the scheme were in the Three Rivers end of the estate.

Iain Sharpe, an Oxhey Liberal Democrat, said he was sympathetic to the residents’ worries but that Watford committee did not have grounds to turn the scheme down.

Park Lib Dem, George Derbyshire, said he also had sympathy with the residents’ concerns.

However he added: "I think on the whole, having looked at it, what is being proposed will be an improvement.

"If you look at the houses being proposed there is no doubt that the standard of housing will be significantly better than what was built in the 1970s."

In the end the eight councillor committee unanimously voted the scheme through.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:32pm Fri 29 Aug 14

D_Penn says...

How many more times will we hear the phrase from a politician that they're "sympathetic to resident's" and then ignore their pleas?

Whatever consultations take place, a proposed housing scheme inevitably goes ahead because those with power always, always, always believe they know better than those actually living in an area.

So, as ever, we hear the contemptuous words of insincere sympathy as yet another housing project gets rubber stamped before the Councillors head off for a glass of wine whilst sitting in their nice homes that have been untouched by the insane infill that everyone else has had imposed on them.

This madness will never end until the present incumbents are voted out.
How many more times will we hear the phrase from a politician that they're "sympathetic to resident's" and then ignore their pleas? Whatever consultations take place, a proposed housing scheme inevitably goes ahead because those with power always, always, always believe they know better than those actually living in an area. So, as ever, we hear the contemptuous words of insincere sympathy as yet another housing project gets rubber stamped before the Councillors head off for a glass of wine whilst sitting in their nice homes that have been untouched by the insane infill that everyone else has had imposed on them. This madness will never end until the present incumbents are voted out. D_Penn
  • Score: 7

5:39pm Fri 29 Aug 14

Cuetip says...

The message from those who are supposed to listen to residents and most importantly enhance our neighbourhoods and not have two tier density standards for different wards is "live in concrete" for the rest of your lives.

No wonder so many voters are fed up and angry leaving the parties to depend on the diminishing tribal voters.

Were the Courtlands Residents Assoc NIMBYs for fighting off a development in their back yards?
The message from those who are supposed to listen to residents and most importantly enhance our neighbourhoods and not have two tier density standards for different wards is "live in concrete" for the rest of your lives. No wonder so many voters are fed up and angry leaving the parties to depend on the diminishing tribal voters. Were the Courtlands Residents Assoc NIMBYs for fighting off a development in their back yards? Cuetip
  • Score: 8

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree