Controversial plans to open a fourth take-away in a Carpenders Park shopping parade have been given the green light by a council.

The proposal for what is believed to be a fish and chip shop in Delta Gain, Watford, was given approval by Three Rivers District Council’s planning committee meeting last night.

This is despite fierce opposition from residents - who believe the takeaway is not needed, and would cause traffic and parking problems.

Dell Clifford, of Alva Way, told the planning committee: "The chaos that is created by people parking on that short stretch of road is incredible. It is a risk to health and safety.

"I am surprised more people have not been knocked down and killed."

Another resident said: "The provision of two [more] fast food outlets seems excessive for such a small parade of shops, it is simply ridiculous.

"Surely to maintain the character of Carpenders Park and to serve its residents, we should encourage businesses such as bakers, green grocers and butchers back to the area."

The authority received 98 objections against the plan but it was still approved by councillors - despite some members raising concerns about parking.

Councillor Ann Shaw, leader of Three Rivers District Council said: "The problem is, however sympathetic we are to these objections, I have not heard a reason which we could justify a refusal.

"The county council has not made any objections, if there was to be a parking scheme, then it would need to be enforced.

"I can also understand the concern people do not want young people hanging around there, but that is not grounds for a refusal."

The Highways Officer did not raise any objections to the plans and council officials believe there would be "sufficient parking" near the parade.

Cllr Chris Whately-Smith, chairman of the planning committee, said the council would explore the possibility of implementing parking restrictions in the area to mitigate residents' concerns.

In a council report, planning officials revealed previous applications for a take away had been rejected because it would "fail to provide the mix of shopping provision necessary to cater for the daily needs of the population".