Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
10:40am Thursday 15th January 2009
Protesters from around the world have joined residents in Bushey Heath campaigning against a phone mast they say will “fry their brains”.
Telecommunications firm O2 have put in a planning application to build a mast in the National Grid Compound in Elstree Road, near Immanuel College and a residential area.
A government database states there are already 1092 masts and communications bases in Hertfordshire.
Following a Watford Observer article about the proposed building, comments have flooded in from international groups.
Martin Weatherall from Canada, the founding director of anti-mast group WEEP and a former Watford Observer photographer, said he became ill following work with the Toronto Police Service that exposed him to electro magnetic pollution.
He strongly disagreed with O2's statements that there was no research linking phone masts with bad health.
He cited more than 50 research papers on the topic as evidence against masts and radiation.
After reading the article on the proposed mast in Bushey Heath, Henrik Eiriksson of www.mast-victims.org said: "If you examine the World Health Organisations research database you will find that 80 per cent of studies on people living near mobile-phone masts show harm to health and quality of life.”
Leslie Winters of Woodstock Road, Bushey Heath voiced anger over the mast being planned near a “huge” mast already located in the nearby Spire Bushey Hospital.
He said: “There is no doubt in my mind that over extensive use of mobile phone gives a headache.
"I understand that they have to have masts but having two on top of you is absurd and disgusting.
"What worries me is that we will be in an enormous triangle between massive masts. If we would allow for that we would all really have our brains fried.
“There is no proof that they are safe. We used to think cigarettes were safe. The phone companies just have a lot of wealth so they can get people to say anything.”
O2 Spokesperson Jim Stevenson said there was no scientific evidence to support any of the protesters claims dispite significant research.
The application, recommended for refusal by Hertsmere Borough Council will be decided at the Radlett Centre, Aldenham Avenue, Radlett on Tuesday at 7.30pm
Paradise Watford, says...
3:16pm Thu 15 Jan 09
Watford_Paddy, watford says...
10:43pm Thu 15 Jan 09
JonBoy, Watford says...
8:56am Fri 16 Jan 09
Watford_Paddy wrote:Professor Paddy of Watford is it?
This Mast must be placed in Bushey Heath as the people who live there have no Brains anyway just like the kids that go to that college. Hope it fries their Brains!!!
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Watford Observer account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in Watford and all around Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in Watford and find friendship
Search Now »
Find properties in Watford and Hertfordshire
Search Now »
Find cars for sale in Watford and Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
J Elliott, Bristol says...
11:53am Thu 15 Jan 09
'Given the results of the present epidemiological studies, it can be concluded that electromagnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer. This is particularly notable for tumours of the central nervous system.'
The harmful effects of this unsafe technology is a time bomb which the telecoms industry is trying to obscure, just like the tobacco industry did with the harm caused by smoking. Unless the public starts to make a stand the serious impact on our health will increase dramatically before the government and phone operators have to admit the damage this technology is causing. Many of us are minimising our use of mobile and cordless phones, and removing wifi and other wireless technology so as to reduce our risks, despite the inconvenience, because the health risks are so significant.