News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Residents lose Ridge Lane battle

A controversial developer has today won a High Court victory following a long battle to build 11 homes in a Watford back garden.

Elizabeth Eley had asked the High Court to quash an inspector's decision – made more than a year ago – to grant permission for the new homes on land in Ridge Lane and Gammons Lane, in Watford.

She claimed the developer, Visao Ltd, had withheld information from the Government planning inspector, including a report that confirmed badgers used the land.

During a dramatic case, she also claimed developers had bought a neighbouring property to the rear of 267 Gammons Lane despite telling the inspector the firm did not own the adjoining land.

Ms Eley argued the developer was seeking to avoid having to build affordable housing – a legally enforceable matter for developments of more than 25 homes – by adopting a piecemeal approach to development.

She said the developer had not provided the documents before the inspector overturned an earlier decision to refuse the firm planning permission.

However, Mr Justice Wynn Williams today ruled permission would have been granted even if the inspector had been given this information.

He said the badgers enjoyed special protection under the law which would have not affected whether permission was granted or not.

He added it was unlikely the neighbouring lane could accommodate 14 new homes – to bring the development past the 25-house threshold for affordable homes.

He said: “There is no evidence before me which suggests that this can be considered as a reasonable possibility.

“The reality is that the failure of disclosure in this case had no effect to the decision reached by the inspector.

“I am satisfied that this decision would have been the same even had disclosure taken place.”

The long battle started after the council refused planning permission for the scheme in July 2007, following objections from local residents.

However, Visao appealed to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Hazel Blears, and her inspector granted planning permission on 13 February 2008.

Residents, backed by local councillors, then launched the High Court appeal.

Comments(4)

Tudor247 says...
8:48pm Fri 3 Apr 09

As ever the scales are weighed against the residents and over development occurs in the name of profit. Could this show that a bit of dishonesty pays? Sorry for the area and the ineffectual planning regime that leads to results like this.

Roy Stockdill says...
10:30pm Fri 3 Apr 09

Ninety-seven times out of a hundred greedy developers will always win. Simple as that.

If they haven't got some bent planning officer in their pocket expecting an anonymous brown envelope, the government will arrange it so that a supposedly "independent" planning inspector is given the right brief and quietly told he can expect promnotion if he gets the "right result".

Has nobody seen Yes Minister? The whole system is as bent as a corkscrew.

butterflies&hurricanes says...
6:21am Sat 4 Apr 09

How can basically building a small housing estate in someones back garden,be right?
A friend of mines family is caught up in all this and i find it worring that this can happen.
I understand that if you live in a nice area,you should expect other people to be drawn to it but this is plain criminal....lets all hope that the developer goes under and cant sell what goes up as this has already happened to the same people in Ridge Lane with other little gaps built on.
Good luck Simon and family....

Paradise Watford says...
11:19am Mon 6 Apr 09

We have no rights anymore as individuals as the government simply don't care what we think

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree