Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
5:20pm Tuesday 8th September 2009 in News
By Michael Pickard
A nightclub in Watford won permission to offer customers “striptease and lap dancing”, despite a council's aspirations to create a “family friendly town centre”.
Members of Watford Borough Council said the decision to grant Vogue permission to host adult entertainment felt “like wearing handcuffs”, tied by the Licensing Act 2003, after a hearing at the Town Hall on Friday.
Under the law, applications can only be rejected if they are judged to be in violation of four “licensing objectives”. These are the prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, the prevention of public nuisance and the protection of children from harm.
But despite representations from a local resident, and letters against the application (many of which were rejected because they were considered to contain morale objections), the licensing sub-committee granted permission for the venue to offer “striptease, lap dancing and other activities of a like kind”.
Speaking against the application, Neil Fitton, of Elm Court, said: “Because of the large number of people who already visit Watford to various other establishments, I think this will cause additional visitors in an overcrowded area where it could give rise to alcohol-related violence.
“Due to the nature of activities, it could also give rise to intimidation and harassment of other females that are out in town.”
However, Julian Skeens, representing Opal Leisure and Neil Campbell, owner of Vogue, offered to reduce the venue's maximum capacity to 150 people from 240, and said it “would not be a place where people get drunk”, referring to its minimum pricing policy for alcohol, where a beer costs £4.
Mr Skeens said: “We don't want to encourage inappropriate sex attacks but all the evidence is lap-dancing clubs reduce crime and disorder in the area.”
Mr Skeens revealed that at the venue, all patrons will be seated at all times, with waiter service at the bar. There will also be private dancing booths and a VIP area with a dancing pole, alongside the main stage.
He added: “We should not shy away from the fact the whole idea of this premises is titilation and not the kind of entertainment we want children exposed to. But what is quite clear is we already have a lap dancing in Watford and I'm not aware of any difficulties with that premises.”
Chairman George Derbyshire, who formed the committee alongside councillors Kareen Hastrick and Andrew Mortimer, said: “The committee concluded that the objections of interested parties couldn't be sustained with reference to the four licensing objectives.
“However, the committee feels that a sex establishment of this nature is not supportive of the council's policy for creating a family friendly town centre and regrets the lack of discretion available to it when considering applications of this nature.”
Conditions were imposed on the licence. These include those contained in the premises' operating schedule; a code of conduct for dancers drawn up by the venue; that the licensee shall not allow distribution of flyers containing photos or other images which suggest that strip tease or similar entertainment takes place on the premises and which may be offensive; and the maximum capacity of the premises shall be limited to 150 whilst adult dancing is taking place.
Following the decision, Mr Campbell told the Watford Observer: “The conditions were our suggestion and I'm quite happy to have them on there. We are the only licence in Hertfordshire to have a minimum [drink] pricing policy.
“We're grateful to the council for granting the licence. We know they're not overly happy about it but we hope in time they will think it was a good idea.”
Comments(10)
big willie
says...
5:37pm Tue 8 Sep 09
Watford_Chick
says...
11:42pm Tue 8 Sep 09
Dorothy Duckworth
says...
9:14am Wed 9 Sep 09
Mike Ribble
says...
9:17am Wed 9 Sep 09
Tudor247
says...
10:23am Wed 9 Sep 09
Mike Ribble wrote:I'm less than sure it is just councillors in Watford that are faced with a dilemma. Public officers have to walk and determine that thin line between freedom for one party and the impact that freedom has on others many times in a year. There are generally accepted moral values to uphold as well. For me I'd eat my Christmas dinner at any other place than Vogue.
There is, unfortunately, a long tradition of Watford Councillors who see it as their duty to impose their moral values on the electorate by trying to dictate what we may or may not see. There was quite a stir when they tried to prevent local cinemas showing 'The Life of Brian'.
Garston Tony
says...
12:18pm Wed 9 Sep 09
Andrew1963
says...
5:14pm Wed 9 Sep 09
The Rover
says...
6:29pm Thu 10 Sep 09
Andrew1963 wrote:Surely the licensing authority have a say. If not, why do they exist?
Tudor 247 is wrong - there is not a thin moral line to keep to. As a licensing authority the councillors & officers simply need to apply the law -bringing their own personal morals and views into any licensing decision is not their job. It is very simple, parliament has decided what can and can not be licensed, local councillors test the law against each application.
Johnjones1959
says...
5:23pm Sun 13 Sep 09
Find a job in Watford and all around Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in Watford and find friendship
Search Now »
Find properties in Watford and Hertfordshire
Search Now »
Find cars for sale in Watford and Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
big willie says...
5:28pm Tue 8 Sep 09
These councillors should lay off the council tax funded 'sauce'.
Who on earth would take their kids to such a place?
Or have they inadvertantly left the door open for the propreitor of this classy joint to stay 'open all hours'?
Answers on a postcard, please...