Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
8:26pm Thursday 27th May 2010 in
With "a heavy heart”, members of Three Rivers District Council have granted permission for a Tesco store in Mill End, despite overwhelming objection from nearby residents and shop owners.
The company has already had two applications rejected for the store and residential development, close to a parade of shops in Tudor Parade.
Revised plans for the site of the former Happy Man pub, in Berry Lane, were revealed in March and show scaled-down development of four flats instead of eight, and built on two levels rather than three.
Councillor Phil Brading said: “We had a similar development in my ward of Croxley Green, the Tesco convenience store there had the same residents' concerns as this application.
“This has been scaled down and is a much less intrusive development which fits in much better.”
Despite these alterations, residents and shop owners sent 449 letters of objection, including an 800 signature petition, largely due to concerns over lack of parking and the increase in traffic which the store would bring.
Peter Crispin, chairman of Rickmansworth and District Residents' Association, said: “I will be astonished, and very happy, if Tesco actually obey all the restrictions placed upon it. In particular I expect the company to blatantly ignore the restrictions on delivery times.
“Until the government allows local councils to fine companies tens of thousands of pounds, or threaten a store with closure, for ignoring the legal commitments they have agreed to then I expect Tesco to continue to treat local communities with contempt”
Christine Alexandrou, who owns Maria Elena Health and Beauty in Tudor Parade condemned Hertfordshire Highways, who had no objection to the development, accusing them of “trying to shut the door once the horse has bolted”.
She said: “The delivery vehicle cannot enter and exit [by] the same route, but will enter from Field Way then exit through Shepherds Lane, which is too narrow and will pass three schools.
“Go to Ruislip High Street where the Costcutter store has now closed after the opening of Tesco Express last year.
“A whole parade has been wiped out after the opening of Tesco Express in Bently, Essex. Approve this application if you want to see boarded up shops.”
Addressing more than 50 residents who attended the meeting, leader of the council Ann Shaw said: “We are not here to judge an application on a referendum basis.
"Competition with other shops in not a valid ground for refusal.
“If this goes to appeal we wouldn't have a leg to stand on, I've read all the papers longing for a grounds for refusal but I cannot find one.”
Councillor Shaw also thanked the residents for their work in resisting the application on a number of occasions.
Members of the development and control committee suggested they had tried to find a reason to refuse the application, but had not been able to.
Chairman of the committee Geoffrey Dunne said he that permission would be granted “with a heavy heart” at the development and control meeting this evening.
Comments(15)
Reader (R)
says...
9:27pm Thu 27 May 10
Roy Storkdill
says...
10:41pm Thu 27 May 10
ghosthorn
says...
8:18am Fri 28 May 10
crazyfrog
says...
9:49am Fri 28 May 10
LSC
says...
11:25am Fri 28 May 10
Roy Storkdill
says...
2:42pm Fri 28 May 10
crazyfrog wrote:TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
Veritas
says...
3:08pm Fri 28 May 10
Jordanw
says...
3:29pm Fri 28 May 10
crazyfrog
says...
3:31pm Fri 28 May 10
Roy Storkdill wrote:A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!
crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
Tudor247
says...
9:35pm Fri 28 May 10
crazyfrog wrote:As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.
Roy Storkdill wrote:A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
crazyfrog
says...
10:10pm Fri 28 May 10
Tudor247 wrote:Sorry should of explained myself a bit better, i was refering to the other planning decision made on thursday night to allow travellers planning permission on green belt land
crazyfrog wrote:As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.Roy Storkdill wrote:A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
Roy Storkdill
says...
11:51pm Fri 28 May 10
crazyfrog wrote:I repeat - TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
Tudor247 wrote:Sorry should of explained myself a bit better, i was refering to the other planning decision made on thursday night to allow travellers planning permission on green belt land http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/81 90017.Traveller_fami ly_given_permission_ to_site_caravan_on_g reen_belt_land/?ref= mrcrazyfrog wrote:As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.Roy Storkdill wrote:A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
crazyfrog
says...
3:27pm Sat 29 May 10
Roy Storkdill wrote:Yes dont repeat yourself Roy, your boring us now.
crazyfrog wrote:I repeat - TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.Tudor247 wrote:Sorry should of explained myself a bit better, i was refering to the other planning decision made on thursday night to allow travellers planning permission on green belt land http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/81 90017.Traveller_fami ly_given_permission_ to_site_caravan_on_g reen_belt_land/?ref= mrcrazyfrog wrote:As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.Roy Storkdill wrote:A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
Irish Boy
says...
12:11am Mon 31 May 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in Watford and all around Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in Watford and find friendship
Search Now »
Find properties in Watford and Hertfordshire
Search Now »
Find cars for sale in Watford and Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Roy Storkdill says...
9:14pm Thu 27 May 10