News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Three Rivers District Council development and control committe grant permission for Tesco on Happy Man site


With "a heavy heart”, members of Three Rivers District Council have granted permission for a Tesco store in Mill End, despite overwhelming objection from nearby residents and shop owners.

The company has already had two applications rejected for the store and residential development, close to a parade of shops in Tudor Parade.

Revised plans for the site of the former Happy Man pub, in Berry Lane, were revealed in March and show scaled-down development of four flats instead of eight, and built on two levels rather than three.

Councillor Phil Brading said: “We had a similar development in my ward of Croxley Green, the Tesco convenience store there had the same residents' concerns as this application.

“This has been scaled down and is a much less intrusive development which fits in much better.”

Despite these alterations, residents and shop owners sent 449 letters of objection, including an 800 signature petition, largely due to concerns over lack of parking and the increase in traffic which the store would bring.

Peter Crispin, chairman of Rickmansworth and District Residents' Association, said: “I will be astonished, and very happy, if Tesco actually obey all the restrictions placed upon it. In particular I expect the company to blatantly ignore the restrictions on delivery times.

“Until the government allows local councils to fine companies tens of thousands of pounds, or threaten a store with closure, for ignoring the legal commitments they have agreed to then I expect Tesco to continue to treat local communities with contempt”

Christine Alexandrou, who owns Maria Elena Health and Beauty in Tudor Parade condemned Hertfordshire Highways, who had no objection to the development, accusing them of “trying to shut the door once the horse has bolted”.

She said: “The delivery vehicle cannot enter and exit [by] the same route, but will enter from Field Way then exit through Shepherds Lane, which is too narrow and will pass three schools.

“Go to Ruislip High Street where the Costcutter store has now closed after the opening of Tesco Express last year.

“A whole parade has been wiped out after the opening of Tesco Express in Bently, Essex. Approve this application if you want to see boarded up shops.”

Addressing more than 50 residents who attended the meeting, leader of the council Ann Shaw said: “We are not here to judge an application on a referendum basis.

"Competition with other shops in not a valid ground for refusal.

“If this goes to appeal we wouldn't have a leg to stand on, I've read all the papers longing for a grounds for refusal but I cannot find one.”

Councillor Shaw also thanked the residents for their work in resisting the application on a number of occasions.

Members of the development and control committee suggested they had tried to find a reason to refuse the application, but had not been able to.

Chairman of the committee Geoffrey Dunne said he that permission would be granted “with a heavy heart” at the development and control meeting this evening.

Comments(15)

Roy Storkdill says...
9:14pm Thu 27 May 10

Hurray, at last. No we'll get some decent quality produce, that's in date and not sold from a filthy hole.

Reader (R) says...
9:27pm Thu 27 May 10

Well Roy, if This espress is anything like Tesco Borehamwood then make sure you check your produce dates. Many a time I've seen items on display and out of date!

Roy Storkdill says...
10:41pm Thu 27 May 10

Don't care, still be better than the over priced crap we have at the moment

ghosthorn says...
8:18am Fri 28 May 10

I really can't understand why the people of Mill End are upset by this? It'll mean more choice and lower prices.

It's a better idea than building another pub there!!!

crazyfrog says...
9:49am Fri 28 May 10

Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!

LSC says...
11:25am Fri 28 May 10

More choice Ghost? Not when everywhere else closes down. Remember, Tescos are now selling insurance, broadband, phone contracts, clothing, DVDs, and recently, houses! This is more than just another little grocer on the High Street. Soon you will only be able to buy what Tesco chooses to sell you.
That isn't choice in my world.

Roy Storkdill says...
2:42pm Fri 28 May 10

crazyfrog wrote:
Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.

Veritas says...
3:08pm Fri 28 May 10

once tesco gets in, prices etc will be competitive for a while to kill off the other traders, then watch the change of tactic.
Don't take our word, visit Whippendell rd, and North Watford to nake a few.

Storkdick is the reason this country is a mess, another person who is short term and unimformed about the damage these big companies can to to a community.

we are not using any Tesco shops for the forseeable future.

Jordanw says...
3:29pm Fri 28 May 10

Funny thing is, these residents will all be shopping in the new Tesco store. If such a proportion objected, surely it wouldn't be a problem even if it is built? These people will just continue shopping in the existing stores?! Thing is, most people would rather a Tesco. Majority wins.

So yeah, I'm sure all these people love to complain, we all do... but you watch. They will shop there. Get your Clubcards ready, folks!

crazyfrog says...
3:31pm Fri 28 May 10

Roy Storkdill wrote:
crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!

Tudor247 says...
9:35pm Fri 28 May 10

crazyfrog wrote:
Roy Storkdill wrote:
crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!
As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.

crazyfrog says...
10:10pm Fri 28 May 10

Tudor247 wrote:
crazyfrog wrote:
Roy Storkdill wrote:
crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!
As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.
Sorry should of explained myself a bit better, i was refering to the other planning decision made on thursday night to allow travellers planning permission on green belt land
http://www.watfordob
server.co.uk/news/81
90017.Traveller_fami
ly_given_permission_
to_site_caravan_on_g
reen_belt_land/?ref=
mr

Roy Storkdill says...
11:51pm Fri 28 May 10

crazyfrog wrote:
Tudor247 wrote:
crazyfrog wrote:
Roy Storkdill wrote:
crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!
As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.
Sorry should of explained myself a bit better, i was refering to the other planning decision made on thursday night to allow travellers planning permission on green belt land http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/81 90017.Traveller_fami ly_given_permission_ to_site_caravan_on_g reen_belt_land/?ref= mr
I repeat - TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.

crazyfrog says...
3:27pm Sat 29 May 10

Roy Storkdill wrote:
crazyfrog wrote:
Tudor247 wrote:
crazyfrog wrote:
Roy Storkdill wrote:
crazyfrog wrote: Another ruling where TRDC planning committee totally ignore the people they are supposed to represent, like the other story where travellers now can build on the green belt TRDC PLANNING YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDABILITY!
TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
A child can tell you that you dont give planning permission on Green Belt protected land ! Also if you have a row of independant shops you dont allow a big fish like Tesco in to snuff out the smaller shops into closure, two crazy decisions in my book!
As I have repeated mailed about this "development" it is the thin criteria permitted by a defective planning law that ties the hands of local democratic planners. I'd agree that an objection on highways access might have helped. However once a single Inspector gets hold of it on appeal, the local view points are effectively of no consequence. Very great sympathies to the independent traders involved hang in there -if you can. For froggy, I'm far from sure an empty pub site is still Green Belt protected.
Sorry should of explained myself a bit better, i was refering to the other planning decision made on thursday night to allow travellers planning permission on green belt land http://www.watfordob server.co.uk/news/81 90017.Traveller_fami ly_given_permission_ to_site_caravan_on_g reen_belt_land/?ref= mr
I repeat - TRDC Planning officers obviously don't have your expertise in planning law. Perhaps you should apply for a job.
Yes dont repeat yourself Roy, your boring us now.

Irish Boy says...
12:11am Mon 31 May 10

Could it be that the folks who live in the nice leafy residential part of Mill End are perhaps worried about the rise in crime from all the council estate chavs loitering on their patch?

Sort it out, you bloody snobs!.... You didn't want a pub, now you don't want a shop....so WHAT the hell do you want?

Answers on a postcard, please...


Tudor Parade Traders promise to "fight Tesco all the way" Tudor Parade Traders promise to "fight Tesco all the way"

Most popular






Watford Observer on Twitter Watford Observer on Facebook

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses