News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Watford Muslim school debated by councillors


Plans for a Muslim primary school in Watford were again discussed by councillors last night.

Campaigners have been fighting to build the school, on a council-owned site in Tolpits Lane, for more than five years.

The Watford Muslim School Trust, set up to plan, fund and deliver the project, has now cleared most administrative hurdles, having secured planning permission, county council support and a land agreement with Watford Borough Council.

The Trust, however, is still working to secure funding, and is currently examining the potential benefits of the new coalition’s government’s free schools programme.

The subject was again discussed at a Watford Borough Council meeting last night, when local GP Dr Riffat Majeed stressed the need for the school – supported by new petition of more than 300 parents.

She argued Muslim children would perform better in a specialist faith school, adding that: “Muslim parents want the same choices that are available to other parents; to send their children to a faith school of their choice.”

Dorothy Thornhill, who believes the school could be up and running in as little as two years, agreed. She said: “Faith schools are legal. It should be no different for the Muslim community, the Jewish community, or any other community.

“We don’t believe that the Muslim community should be treated any differently. This is about choice and we are also 90 places short this year already – so this will help towards the shortage.”

Mayor Thornhill warned, however, that a private school would not be tolerated on the site, stressing that any development had to be open to all.

Councillor George Derbyshire also welcomed the principle of the school, but rejected any suggestion that schools in West Watford were failing Muslim children in any way.

Councillor Andrew Mortimer, meanwhile, warned against funding and services being diverted from other schools in the area.

Comments(40)

Stacy Hart says...
11:33am Thu 22 Jul 10

yep lets keep bowing down and sucking up to everybody elses needs, and bugger our own. How many schools & colleges have been knocked down in watford? how many kids have to bus to school, having to take two even because the schools are no longer in walking distance. Its tough enough trying to get a kid out of bed, let alone to school without them having to spend an hour or more on the journey each way & standing out in the cold & rain before the days even started. If any new schools are going to be built in Watford they need to be for EVERYONE and not single faith. See this is my shackles go up, If being able to live a muslim life is so important, if being taught at a muslim school is so important, if wearing a burkha is so important, if having the right to a mosque is so important, what the hell are muslim people doing in the uk if they want to live their own way, we're British....for how much longer is the question, but if i stroll around in a bikini with a bag of fish and chips in one hand and a bottle of bud in the other i wouldn't be going to live in Dubai any time soon. We can be a tolerant nation without being a stupid nation, you have to draw the line. :O xxx

Reader (R) says...
11:35am Thu 22 Jul 10

The word is "INTEGRATION"

The Rover says...
11:50am Thu 22 Jul 10

This is so wrong. I cannot believe that the council would even consider a single faith school. If the muslin community want a school exclusively for the Muslin community then they should fund it themselves and it certainly should not be built on council land. Even schools like St Joan of Arc and St. Michaels have been opened up to different faiths. As a country I feel we have been very tolerant with immigration and different faiths, but you reach a point where you have to draw a line and say enough is enough. How would the Muslin Community feel if it was proposed to open a school for White British Catholics exclusively, funded by the local council and built on council land using government and local council grants? There would be outrage and accusations of racism. On one hand we talk of integration and equal opportunities, then we consider opening a Muslin only school. Unreal.

Garston Tony says...
12:31pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Mention the word Muslim and what a suprise (not), all the usual ignorance, prejudice and bigotry is spouted. It has already been stressed that this will NOT be a private school and therefore WILL be open to all not just Muslims. But just like Joan of Ark has a Christian slant this school will have a Muslim one. What is wrong with that? The ignorance and quite frankly blatant racism of Stacy, Reader and the Rover seeps out and smells like an overflowing portaloo at Glastonbury. And by the way, I am white, Christian and born in this country to a long long line of people born in this country. I used to be proud of this country despite all its faults, but whilst some of the problems we face can be attributed to too many immigrants being allowed into the country by far the majority of what is wrong with Britain is caused by WHITE BRITISH so call INDIGENOUS people.

crazyfrog says...
1:25pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Garston Tony wrote:
Mention the word Muslim and what a suprise (not), all the usual ignorance, prejudice and bigotry is spouted. It has already been stressed that this will NOT be a private school and therefore WILL be open to all not just Muslims. But just like Joan of Ark has a Christian slant this school will have a Muslim one. What is wrong with that? The ignorance and quite frankly blatant racism of Stacy, Reader and the Rover seeps out and smells like an overflowing portaloo at Glastonbury. And by the way, I am white, Christian and born in this country to a long long line of people born in this country. I used to be proud of this country despite all its faults, but whilst some of the problems we face can be attributed to too many immigrants being allowed into the country by far the majority of what is wrong with Britain is caused by WHITE BRITISH so call INDIGENOUS people.
yes and caused by people like you Tony !

This is wrong wrong wrong !

this is self inflicted apartheid, how can young muslims intergrate with this country if they are brought up in seperate schools?
it is quite outrageous that the council are even entertaining the idea

watfordboy3 says...
1:28pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Let them have it, that way there will less Muslims in our schools, I would not even think about sending my kids there. Let them be segregated, thats what they want and its fine by me.

Garston Tony says...
2:45pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Young muslims that go to Muslim schools can integrate just as well as any child that goes to a Christian school, a Jewish school, a boys or girls only school or any other private or state school. Its not about segregation or apartheid its about wanting your children to have the best education in what you believe is the best environment for them.

I say it again, the ONLY reason people are against this school is because of the Muslim connection and not an eyelid would be bat if it was going to be a Christian school for instance.

As a Christian I have faced a lot of bigotry over the years from my fellow Brits, but it isnt a patch on what the Muslim community gets and quite frankly I dont blame them for wanting to keep themselves to themselves if thats what some of them want to do.

And Crazyfrog the fact that you think those who are open minded, fair and not prejudiced are also to blame for social ills just goes to prove my point that many Brits should look at themselves before they blame anyone else for their problems.

The Rover says...
3:19pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Garston Tony wrote:
Mention the word Muslim and what a suprise (not), all the usual ignorance, prejudice and bigotry is spouted. It has already been stressed that this will NOT be a private school and therefore WILL be open to all not just Muslims. But just like Joan of Ark has a Christian slant this school will have a Muslim one. What is wrong with that? The ignorance and quite frankly blatant racism of Stacy, Reader and the Rover seeps out and smells like an overflowing portaloo at Glastonbury. And by the way, I am white, Christian and born in this country to a long long line of people born in this country. I used to be proud of this country despite all its faults, but whilst some of the problems we face can be attributed to too many immigrants being allowed into the country by far the majority of what is wrong with Britain is caused by WHITE BRITISH so call INDIGENOUS people.
Tony, I would consider wanting a Muslim only school to be racist, not voicing my opinion in opposing it. I am all for equal opportunities and integration, rather than segregation. How can that be racist?

Toshhorn says...
4:02pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Why is it as soon as you critisise Muslems someone shouts racism?
It is not racist to express opinions against other races or faiths, it only becomes so if you are abusive or rude.
Lets have it said, the majority of non muslem folk in this country are sick to death of them always getting their own way and crying racism when they don't.
Go to Mecca in a short skirt, see what happens, kiss a girl in public in Saudi Arabia, see what happens, try and marry an Muslim girl ,see what happens.
Go down the tube blow up and kill many innocent people then expect you faith to be repected???
After being blown up on trains and buses, is it racist to be wary of Asian people with ruck sacks or wearing Burka's (bearing in mind this is how one of the london bombers escaped).
Go to North Watford cemetary on a Friday afternoon and ask the Muslims why they are parking there then crossing the road to go to the Mosque, they cry racism but how are we supposed to visit our loved ones when they fill up the car park?
No not racism, just ordinary folk who have had enough and yes I know some smart thinking free spirits look down their noses at us but we are in the majority , so we should be listened to.

Stacy Hart says...
7:37pm Thu 22 Jul 10

Why is it that whenever anyone disgrees with what the muslim community want we're branded rascist? what a sick an unfair judgement Tony, as a christian man that you claim to be then shame on you, maybe you should recap on the bible again. The issue isn't a rascist one at all, its people like you that always turn it into one that causes the trouble. Wheres your tolerance? Everyone of every faith is entitled to air an opinion and disagree with each other because thats what human beings do, regardless of age, faith, colour etc it doesn't make it rascist, how offensive are you. I dont believe there should be any single faith schools, follow your faith at home by all means, children are at school to be educated. And to reader R at the top of this page you condradict yourself by saying "intergration" if muslim children, go to muslim schools how is that intergrating into british society with all the other cultures at mixed schools? :0 xxx

Stacy Hart says...
9:57pm Thu 22 Jul 10

To reader R i'll appologise in advance coz i reckon i might've mistaken your comment, i think by intergration you meant people should intergrate not segregate in this way. Anyhow soz for reading it wrong if i did. :)

Therraw Ankers says...
1:01am Fri 23 Jul 10

I'm Back!

croxleyone says...
7:44am Fri 23 Jul 10

In the article there is no mention of cost, how much is the land worth that WBC are allowing to be used, is the land open space at the moment, how much will the build cost? Anyone out there know and will the cost come out of the WBC education budget. How many pupils are expected to go there?

Therraw Ankers says...
8:19am Fri 23 Jul 10

croxleyone wrote:
In the article there is no mention of cost, how much is the land worth that WBC are allowing to be used, is the land open space at the moment, how much will the build cost? Anyone out there know and will the cost come out of the WBC education budget. How many pupils are expected to go there?
The land has a market value of around 1- 1.5 Million, if sold as a development site.
As mentioned by in a recently deleted comment, this school trust is broke, so you can bet your bottom dollar that the money will eventually be given to Dorothys' chosen few, regardless of the fact that even though 300 Muslim parents want this school, another petition shows that over 1,000 people who live in the area are against this proposed development.

Therraw Ankers says...
9:27am Fri 23 Jul 10

Garston Tony wrote:
Mention the word Muslim and what a suprise (not), all the usual ignorance, prejudice and bigotry is spouted. It has already been stressed that this will NOT be a private school and therefore WILL be open to all not just Muslims. But just like Joan of Ark has a Christian slant this school will have a Muslim one. What is wrong with that? The ignorance and quite frankly blatant racism of Stacy, Reader and the Rover seeps out and smells like an overflowing portaloo at Glastonbury. And by the way, I am white, Christian and born in this country to a long long line of people born in this country. I used to be proud of this country despite all its faults, but whilst some of the problems we face can be attributed to too many immigrants being allowed into the country by far the majority of what is wrong with Britain is caused by WHITE BRITISH so call INDIGENOUS people.
Would you send your kids to such a 'school', Tony?...

Thought not....

croxleyone says...
9:29am Fri 23 Jul 10

When the pupils end their primary school education. Will their parents object to them going to a mixed faith secondary school, are there secondary schools in the Watford area for muslims. Or is that another bridge to be crossed?

Garston Tony says...
10:01am Fri 23 Jul 10

Actually Stacy I do know my Bible and it is exactly the type of attitude that you and some of the other posters here have taken that is contrary to what Christ taught. You call me intolerant yet you are the one who is against this school purely because they want it to be a Muslim faith one! And it is you who has basically called for all Muslims to 'go home'! Forgetting of course that many if not possible most Muslims in Britain are actually born here and have as much right to call themselves British as anyone else. Its you who are intolerant, not me. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but when it is based on prejudice then its not going to be right is it? The Rover says we have to draw the line somewhere, and wants to draw the line at Muslim faith schools. Well for every Joan of ark there IS a school which is still Christian or Jewish only. Why don’t you draw the line with those too Rover along with same sex and private schools which are equally into 'segregation' then you might be considered consistent, if its Muslim only schools you have a problem with then that IS Racist. And Toshhorn comments like Muslims 'always getting their own way' is also why racism can be brought up, being wary of EVERY Asian and thinking that Islam encourages terrorism is prejudiced and ignorant. Therraw, my children went to a Christian primary school because that is my faith. Seeing as that for most people is not controversial then why is it controversial for Muslim parents to want to send their children to a Muslim faith school? You’re not being forced to send you're children there yet you want to deny Muslims the rights which are open to other faiths. How is that fair? And if Christian secondary shools are okay why shouldn’t Muslim secondary schools be okay too? If there is in place, as in the past and even more so with the new government policy, to set up your own school why should the Muslim community be excluded from that?

jesus loves you says...
1:51pm Fri 23 Jul 10

If I recall correctly schools can now be run and paid for by private funding and if I also correctly recall St Michaels and Joan of Arc were also setup by private funding (many years ago) so why should the council use tax payers money to build a school for a small percentage of the society (I don't care if it's Muslim or Jewish or even Jedi!). The point should be that education in this country is a right and we should be happy that every child gets a high level of education compared to other parts of the world. As for faith schools, they are in principle a good idea , the problem being is that the Muslim faith hasn’t really had a great deal of good PR over the last decade (for whatever reason) and I don’t think that separating children from other children now is really a good idea for integration. Time is great healer and I like most people have no issue with religion or colour (the name posted is a joke!) but trying to please one part of society over another when feeling are delicate is a little silly.

I’m now waiting for the “racist” post afterwards…… That’s such an easy and pointless remark to make.

Enoch Powell says...
10:19pm Fri 23 Jul 10

'Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad'. Successive politicians' Mass Immigration Policies.
'Like a country busily engaged heaping up its own funeral pyre' Successive politicians' Mass Immigration Policies.
'Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population.' Successive politicians' Mass Immigration Policies.
Thank you Labour. Thank you Conservatives and mostly thank you former Labour Government advisor Andrew Neather, after honestly claiming that the Labour Party from 2001 onwards, set about a deliberate policy of encouraging mass third world immigration, to socially engineer a multicultural society. All done without a vote, referendum or mandate from the people. Part of the result, the advent of a Muslim Faith School. Thank you.

Garston Tony says...
9:01am Sat 24 Jul 10

I happen to agree that far too many people have been given the right to come to this country and that it is not right that - thanks to the eu laws which we our government agreed to without bothering to ask us - we are so attractive to so many who want to live off our welfare state. If someone wants to come here and work for their upkeep and there is a place for them fine, if they want to come here and complain that their house is in the wrong area and get tens of thousands in benefits and sit on their behinds thats wrong. And yes i'm aware that many of the people that have come to this country to do that are Muslim, but so have many people of other and no faiths and by the same token many immigrants have worked hard once they have come to this country whilst there are many many 'indeginous' Brits who are also more than happy to never lift a finger and expect the state to support them from craddle to grave. However the issue here is about a school and it is hypocritical beyond belief to say its okay to have Christian faith schools but not a Muslim faith school. Jesus Loves you makes some good points and in a non racist way unlike Stacy and Rover comments however the state currently allows funding for all faith schools so again why should a Muslim school be singled out and not a Christian one? And Muslims are not a small percentage of society but make up 3 million of the population! There are far more practising Muslims in this country than there are practising Christians thats for sure

earth_chylde says...
12:58pm Sat 24 Jul 10

Martin Luther King fought long and hard to stop segrigation... what a waste of his time.. we are going backwards!

Stacy Hart says...
2:04pm Sat 24 Jul 10

earth_chylde wrote:
Martin Luther King fought long and hard to stop segrigation... what a waste of his time.. we are going backwards!
Agree with you wholeheartedly earth-chylde...as for Tony,you keep spouting the word rascist at every opportunity alongside mine and a few others names on here who simply have a different opinion than yours,, a very serious and dangerous allegation to make and which sadly a minority of people like yourself make purely when people dont agree with you.As i've clearly stated before this article is about a muslim school so it would be pointless in talking about a malaysian school, but i'll do so anyway, i would say the same thing be it a jewish school (my grandads jewish by the way), or any other single faith school. whether your born here or you come here from abroad then you should live by that countries way and not try to force it to your own.Which is why i'm against English people flocking to spain and various other countries forming communities and opening up british pubs and chip shops, its wrong, just my opinion. Back to Schools, they should not be about faith, practice faith at home by all means, practice faith at your place of worship by all means but school should be for ALL children of all nationalities to be educated maths english, p.e etc full stop. When religeon is bought into anything it often causes trouble as previous & continuing wars have shown. We can all learn from each other and i have many friends of all nationalties that i'm able to share and learn many things from, they love going back to visit their homeland but they also share a belief that out of respect when your in rome you do as the romans do. :) xxx

Enoch Powell says...
3:47pm Sat 24 Jul 10

I note Tony's comments but there are still more Christians practising than Muslims, mainly through Catholics. Secondly, I accept your notion that there are 'indigenous Brits' living off the state. Who's fault is that. That is the Government's fault for providing a welfare state that rewards idleness. Successive Government failures to address this and take away the family and work ethic is a disgrace. I know it is en vougue to criticise 'indigenous Brits' for being dole spongers but there are plenty of ethnic minorities who do the same. Back to the issue of a Muslim School. I think it is as devisive as inviting Nick Griffin to Buckingham Palace. Regardless of any denials, the object of Islam is to be the majority religion in this Country, which will happen with current Immigration and demographic trends. However, at the moment, the Queen is the defender of THE faith, which just so happens to be Christianity. Therefore, there should only be Christian Schools. Until the template is changed for the Queen to being the defender of faith, then I won't change my mind.

jesus loves you says...
9:01pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Stacy Hart - having been an immigrate in to another country, you do flock to others like you (ie from the same country) as that's a part of life. When in Rome, do what the Romans do but don't most immigrates want to do that but don't feel welcome to do so? That's how I felt. It's all to easy to say change because your in the UK, I think more along the line of intergrate but keep your faith as it's a part of who you are.

CallowlandChris says...
10:33pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Tricky one this but as others have already said, the key here is consistency.

As someone who went to a good Church of England state school and a good secular state school, I can see the appeal of both approaches. On balance, I'd agree with most of what Tony has said (not sure there are more practising Muslims than Christians in this country though).

Enoch Powell's comments about Islam are desperately deluded. I'd say it's the aim of all religions to be the number one in any country - that goes without saying. However, the idea that it will become the largest religion in Britain is laughable. Over 95% of people in this country are white and the level of Islamic conversion amongst that demographic is tiny. You can scaremonger all you like but facts are not your friend.

Stacy: You said: "When religeon is bought into anything it often causes trouble as previous & continuing wars have shown."

I'm not going to defend al religious people, as many of them are nuts, but that is a desperately ignorant thing to say. The vast majority of wars and war fatalities of the past hundred years had jack all to do with religion: World War I and II, the various wars that made up the Cold War. Cambodia, communist china etc etc.

You might dislike something, but to blame it for all the world's problems is daft...

Enoch Powell says...
10:52pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Callowland Chris says my remarks about the Islamic demograhic in this County are deluded. I think he is having a laugh. Most Muslims in the Uk have circa 4 children on average if not more, and the demographic for the White British is 1.7. That is not racism but a statistical fact. Add in Mass Immigration, arranged marriages etc and my 'scaremongering' will become reality more quickly than you can imagine. He says 95% of people in the UK are white. It didn't say that in the 2001 census (91.8%) and that was before Labour embarked on their plan to rub people's noses into diversity through Mass Immigration from the thirld world as former Labour speech writer Andrew Neather has admitted. Therefore, it is Callowland Chris who has got his facts wrong. He says it is the desire of all religions to be the majority in a country and he is actually right. I am happy with the status quo with Christians in the ascendency and have not asked for that to change. I would like to know if Chris agrees with me as far as the act of consent is concerned.

croxleyone says...
8:32am Mon 26 Jul 10

We are deemed a christian country because we have practiced that faith. If 335 MPs are of another faith and become the majority, even less would be needed if there was a 15% reduction of current MPs then what stops them changing the faith, as a country we have no written constitution.

Garston Tony says...
1:04pm Mon 26 Jul 10

We are known as a Christian country but surely that is in name only now, as I said there are only around 1million people who attend a Christian church on regular basis out of a population of around 65 million. Many people would class themselves as Christian but you cant be a Christian if you don’t practise the faith as it is practising the faith that makes you a Christian in the first place and the vast majority of the population does not practise any religion. There are around 1.6 million practising Muslims making them the largest practising faith in this country.

But that is by the by, the issue is about schools and if one faith group has the right to have schools of their faith then every faith should have that right. You can argue that there should be no faith schools but not that one group should be allowed them and another not. And I have used the word racist because some of the opinions and statements made HAVE been of that inclination.

On the note of religious wars, most religions abhor wars and violence and those wars, conflicts and attrocities that have and do take place in their name are against what does religions teach and are usually more to do with the very human goals of those that start them.

croxleyone says...
3:11pm Mon 26 Jul 10

Churches are closing and Mosques are being built and muslims attending. To me personally being christian doesn't mean going into a building deemed holy. It is about my attitude towards others. Some may disagree.

The Rover says...
4:18pm Mon 26 Jul 10

Garston Tony wrote:
We are known as a Christian country but surely that is in name only now, as I said there are only around 1million people who attend a Christian church on regular basis out of a population of around 65 million. Many people would class themselves as Christian but you cant be a Christian if you don’t practise the faith as it is practising the faith that makes you a Christian in the first place and the vast majority of the population does not practise any religion. There are around 1.6 million practising Muslims making them the largest practising faith in this country.

But that is by the by, the issue is about schools and if one faith group has the right to have schools of their faith then every faith should have that right. You can argue that there should be no faith schools but not that one group should be allowed them and another not. And I have used the word racist because some of the opinions and statements made HAVE been of that inclination.

On the note of religious wars, most religions abhor wars and violence and those wars, conflicts and attrocities that have and do take place in their name are against what does religions teach and are usually more to do with the very human goals of those that start them.
Tony, I have not said that I oppose a Muslim school, I oppose any school which encourages segregation, and I consider wanting a Muslin-only school to be racist, rather than opposing it.

I have been to mosques on numerous occasions and I am amazed at the number of people praying, and have even seen mosques so full that they are praying in the car park. You would never see that at a church in Watford. Without doubt Muslins follow their belief more closely than Christians. I am a Christian but do not go to church on a regular basis (unless you consider about once a year to be regular).

None of my comments have been racist, but I do disapprove of a state-funded Muslin School. That is not a racist comment.

CallowlandChris says...
11:35pm Mon 26 Jul 10

The Rover wrote:
Garston Tony wrote: We are known as a Christian country but surely that is in name only now, as I said there are only around 1million people who attend a Christian church on regular basis out of a population of around 65 million. Many people would class themselves as Christian but you cant be a Christian if you don’t practise the faith as it is practising the faith that makes you a Christian in the first place and the vast majority of the population does not practise any religion. There are around 1.6 million practising Muslims making them the largest practising faith in this country. But that is by the by, the issue is about schools and if one faith group has the right to have schools of their faith then every faith should have that right. You can argue that there should be no faith schools but not that one group should be allowed them and another not. And I have used the word racist because some of the opinions and statements made HAVE been of that inclination. On the note of religious wars, most religions abhor wars and violence and those wars, conflicts and attrocities that have and do take place in their name are against what does religions teach and are usually more to do with the very human goals of those that start them.
Tony, I have not said that I oppose a Muslim school, I oppose any school which encourages segregation, and I consider wanting a Muslin-only school to be racist, rather than opposing it. I have been to mosques on numerous occasions and I am amazed at the number of people praying, and have even seen mosques so full that they are praying in the car park. You would never see that at a church in Watford. Without doubt Muslins follow their belief more closely than Christians. I am a Christian but do not go to church on a regular basis (unless you consider about once a year to be regular). None of my comments have been racist, but I do disapprove of a state-funded Muslin School. That is not a racist comment.
Fair play - not racist. I have been to churches before that are very full. The more 'happy clappy' sort can be very popular in particular. Plus they are building a new church in Watford at the moment, despite the town already having more than I can count - so there clearly are a lot of Christians in the town. Regardles, there are clearly more christians (71.8%) in this country than muslims (2.8%).

CallowlandChris says...
11:42pm Mon 26 Jul 10

Enoch Powell wrote:
Callowland Chris says my remarks about the Islamic demograhic in this County are deluded. I think he is having a laugh. Most Muslims in the Uk have circa 4 children on average if not more, and the demographic for the White British is 1.7. That is not racism but a statistical fact. Add in Mass Immigration, arranged marriages etc and my 'scaremongering' will become reality more quickly than you can imagine. He says 95% of people in the UK are white. It didn't say that in the 2001 census (91.8%) and that was before Labour embarked on their plan to rub people's noses into diversity through Mass Immigration from the thirld world as former Labour speech writer Andrew Neather has admitted. Therefore, it is Callowland Chris who has got his facts wrong. He says it is the desire of all religions to be the majority in a country and he is actually right. I am happy with the status quo with Christians in the ascendency and have not asked for that to change. I would like to know if Chris agrees with me as far as the act of consent is concerned.
Yes, i'll hold my hands up for that mistake. Only 4.8% of the population are asian, but that does not mean that over 95% are white, as there are other groupings. My general point stands though: only 2.8% of the population are muslim. That might have since crept up to 3%, but these are miniscule figures and to suggest otherwise is just racist scaremongering by our BNP friends.

Two quick points:
1) Even though Muslim Brits have a higher birthrate than non-Muslim Brits, the rate is insufficient to make the kind of fundmental demographic changes that Enoch is trying to delude people with.
2) Their birthrate is likely to fall over time - as all birthrates have done in the West (look at Catholics in Italy if you don't believe me).

Garston Tony says...
9:34am Tue 27 Jul 10

Being a Christian is about believing/accepting the words of Christ and trying to put them into practise in your every day life as best you can. No Christian is perfect but whilst it would be nice and easy if this was the case it is more than just trying to be nice to everyone around you, its more than just going to church once a week and it is even more than just believing that there is a God. Unless you live the life and follow Christ and his teachings to the best of your ability then you are not really a Christian so there is no way 70% of the population is Christian. I saddly doubt if even 5% of the population is. Not being elitist, every true Christian struggles at times if not all the time and I am certainly no different. For most of the 70% + who claim to be Christian I can only compare it to someone claiming to be a Watford FC supporter but not going to any games, not looking out for the results,not knowing any of the players names and maybe even going to a Luton game every now and then.

The Rover fair enough if you are against all faith schools that is consistent, my point was that in your original post you said a line had to be drawn and you were drawing it in that post at Muslim schools, not at all faith schools.

croxleyone says...
3:17pm Tue 27 Jul 10

Anyone know when the last faith school was built in the Watford area and what faith was it built for? If over 25 years ago, then hardly anyone would have objected, also because their is a forum, people can comment.

Enoch Powell says...
9:38pm Tue 27 Jul 10

At least Callowland Chris recognises he is not impervious to mistakes. As far as 'BNP' scaremongering is concerned about the Muslim Demographic I have quoted independently proven statistics. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to work out that with compound growth there will be an Islamic majority in the UK and Europe on current trends in the not too distant future, especially when 'Cast Iron' Dave Cameron lets Turkey into the EU and immediately opens our borders where other EU countries close theirs. I would suggest that Chris moves to Tower Hamlets and he may find out that I may have a point. Compare that area with that of 40 years ago. The only people playing down the Islamic Demographic are Asian journalists and Liberals. My figures are borne out of researched hard statistical facts and I am only interested in the truth rather than being maligned by a tawdry political tag that Chris is using to kill the argument off.

CallowlandChris says...
11:05pm Tue 27 Jul 10

Enoch: The numbers you quote are indeed factual, but it's the conclusions you draw from them that is the problem. If 97% of the population have halve the fertility rate of the other 3%, then the latter group are in no danger of overtaking the former any time soon. Plus, as I said, it is a meaningless concept because the fertility rate of the latter group will fall over time.

Given how opposed the other big countries in Europe are to Turkey joining the EU, you need to worry about that one.

Tower Hamlets is one extreme. Go to Cornwall and you may see that I have a point!

The only people exaggerating the 'Islamic demographic' are racists and fascists!

Labour tightened up immigration on their way out and the ConDem coalition are tightening it up even more, so Enoch you can chill out!

croxleyone says...
10:49am Wed 28 Jul 10

If only 15% populate at 1.8 children and 3% at 4 then the process will be much quicker.

Enoch Powell says...
7:36pm Wed 28 Jul 10

Chris, if you call Labour immigration controls tightening up and the ConDem's plans on immigration something like control, then I think you are deluded. If you also think the Islamic population of the UK is 3% then I think that is wrong, as I think the last census figures are severley skewed. If I take the view that the Islamic Demographic will rise quicker than expected why should I be called a racist and a fascist. You say Tower Hamlets is an isloated example, what about Bradford, Southall, Oldham, Burnley, Preston, Leicester, the East End of Glasgow and Sparkbrook in Birmingham. Similarly, if i say that the Catholic birth rate in Northern Ireland is higher than the Protestant birth rate which will lead to a United Ireland in a generation or so when a vote is held, as specified in the Good Friday agreement does that also brand me a racist and a fascist for interpretating and articulating statistics. I think you ought to be very careful how you casually use the terms racist and fascist as my experience tells me that when you execute a cogent argument and are winning, a put down (such as racist and fascist) is your only means of trying to level the playing field.

CallowlandChris says...
10:17pm Wed 28 Jul 10

We'll have to agree to disagree about the relative merits of government immigration controls. Facts are that numbers have gone down significantly.

If you are too paranoid to believe the census figures then that's your problem.

The 'racist and fascist' comment was in response to your 'Asian journalists and liberals' quip. However, if your agenda is to whip up resentment about people who look different from you by exaggerating the rate of population growth then yes - that does make you a racist.

No, Tower Hamlets is an extreme example. Just as rural Cornwall is the other way. In response to your list: rural England, Wales, Scotland (excluding the big cities), east anglia, Harrogate, York etc etc. You get the idea. That over 90% of the population are white suggests that a lot of places are very white indeed!

I'd agree with your analysis of Northern Ireland, but the ratio was closer to 50:50 anyway.

Sorry Enoch, I have already won this argument. The fact you may be a racist hard-right type is but an incidental footnote!

Enoch Powell says...
7:49am Thu 29 Jul 10

Your quip about 'racists and fascists' about my comment about Liberals and Asian Journalists downplaying the Islamic Demographic is merely a researched observation. If you take the view that this is a good thing, and the fact that you do not mind that no one has been consulted about it, then in a democracy that is fine, and note I have not maligned you. If I hypothosise a view based on the cold hard statistics of demographics and bring other factors into consideration then that is my right. Fascism is actually expunging people's views which is something you seem to endorse. With regard to your comments on Cornwall, was that Islamic previously. I just merely want that point clarified factually. You infer I am a 'hard right type'. I find that comment disgusting, as I hold left wing views in my own panoramic political analysis. Whatever you think about me, I know that through Mass Immigration and exponential birth rates, we are heading for population armageddon in the UK, where services are already creaking with the supposed population of 61 million. To compound that deliberately is nothing short of negligence with no money in the Government coffers. I am not sure what you are going to call me now, but don't call me a liar.


Most popular






Watford Observer on Twitter Watford Observer on Facebook

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses