Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
12:26pm Thursday 29th July 2010 in
A scheme to upgrade Watford’s speed cameras has been put on hold, as Government spending cuts continue to bite.
The Hertfordshire Safety Camera Partnership, jointly operated by the county council, police, and courts service, was in the process of upgrading the town’s stock of wet film cameras – which need to be emptied manually – to automated digital devices.
But the scheme, affecting more than a dozen cameras in the Watford area, has now been put on hold after the Government announced this week that central funding for speed cameras would be withdrawn.
Local authorities up and down the country are now working out how to plug the holes in their annual camera budgets.
In Oxfordshire, the funding reduction has led to a decision to scrap all speed cameras. In Hertfordshire, however, councillors have announced that there are no plans (for the time being) to reduce the number of cameras in the county.
Instead, explained Councillor Stuart Pile, executive member for road safety, no action will be taken until other options, including efficiency savings, had been considered.
One immediate saving has been made by cancelling the conversion scheme across the south west of the county, as no new equipment can now be purchased. No existing cameras, however, will be removed of the time being.
Councillor Pile expressed concerns at the hurried nature of the proposals, which, he argued, may actually save very little money for the government if the county’s annual £2million fines revenue (paid to the government) was depleted as a result.
He explained that no major decisions will yet be made. He said: “We are looking at things that we could be doing. One is to reduce cameras, but do we then tell people that, or will that encourage people to speed by them?
“There are lots of questions to be looked at and these questions are looked at now.
“The number of people killed and seriously in injured [in road accidents] is reducing and last year was the lowest on record. My biggest fear is about what happens if the number rises. Personally I would not wish to see a reduction in the number of safety cameras across Hertfordshire. It means that drivers who speed will get away with it, is that the right message to be sending out?”
Comments(10)
cameluk
says...
2:49pm Thu 29 Jul 10
The Rover
says...
7:04pm Thu 29 Jul 10
Insight
says...
7:21pm Thu 29 Jul 10
Tudor247
says...
8:30pm Thu 29 Jul 10
CallowlandChris
says...
11:15pm Thu 29 Jul 10
The Rover wrote:Long - Straight - Road - In - Residential - Area = Cars speeding up and crashing into cyclists, other cars and pedestrians. Basic transport psychology...
Safety Cameras were supposed to be used in accident hotspots, so why are there safety cameras all the way up Hempstead Road? Hardly an accident Hotspot. Its a long straight road.
Insight
says...
2:11am Fri 30 Jul 10
CallowlandChris wrote:When the DfT first started claiming such a high benefit for speed cameras, respected academics Dr Linda Mountain of Liverpool University and Mike Maher, Professor of the Mathematical Analysis of Transport Systems at Leeds, objected. The DfT took notice, and the 2005 report included an appendix supplied by this pair showing in meticulous detail how the effect of speed cameras was almost certainly less than half the 42 per cent quoted.
The Rover wrote: Safety Cameras were supposed to be used in accident hotspots, so why are there safety cameras all the way up Hempstead Road? Hardly an accident Hotspot. Its a long straight road.Long - Straight - Road - In - Residential - Area = Cars speeding up and crashing into cyclists, other cars and pedestrians. Basic transport psychology... gusgreen: If they are just a way of making money, then why are they be cutting back to save money. Think it through... cameluk: every survey into speed cameras ever done has showed that they reduce traffic accidents. FACT. Taking one camera as an example is statistically insignificant. You have to look at the bigger picture. Your Oxfordshire case study doesn't even exist. Insight: got a source for that fantasy you just made up? Thought not...
Insight
says...
2:42am Fri 30 Jul 10
Insight
says...
2:47am Fri 30 Jul 10
Insight
says...
2:49am Fri 30 Jul 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in Watford and all around Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in Watford and find friendship
Search Now »
Find properties in Watford and Hertfordshire
Search Now »
Find cars for sale in Watford and Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
gusgreen says...
2:40pm Thu 29 Jul 10
Proof of this is look where they are situated nearly always on a hill or other "convieient" places,also check the report above which says
"may actually save very little money for the government if the county’s annual £2million fines revenue (paid to the government) was depleted as a result."
Which bit of not making money does this not refer to.
Now put more ANPR cameras in mobile units and Police cars then thats a different matter altogether.