News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


'Depraved' Watford paedophile has life sentence overturned

Barry Charles McCloud, 54, was jailed for life at St Albans Crown Court in December last year Barry Charles McCloud, 54, was jailed for life at St Albans Crown Court in December last year

A "depraved" paedophile who drugged a ten-year-old Indian girl in Goa so he could film himself raping her has had his life sentence overturned by top judges on appeal.

Barry Charles McCloud, 54, was jailed for life at St Albans Crown Court in December last year after admitting a catalogue of sexual offences, including rape, sexual assault and making indecent photographs of children.

But lawyers for McCloud, of Tudor Walk, Watford, claimed discretionary life sentences should be reserved for even more serious criminals, and brought his case to the Court of Appeal.

Three senior judges, sitting at the London court, today agreed to replace his life term with a less draconian sentence of imprisonment for public protection (IPP).

The sentence still means McCloud will have to serve at least seven years behind bars and will only be freed once the Parole Board is convinced the danger he poses to the public has passed. However, he will be able to apply to lift licence conditions 10 years after his release.

Mr Justice Treacy, sitting with Lord Justice Pitchford and Judge William Davis QC, said McCloud had sponsored a young boy in India after he and his wife visited Goa.

But, following the couple's separation, McCloud returned to the resort between 2005 and 2006 and had a ten-year-old relation of the boy to his apartment to stay.

The judge said nothing was discovered about what he did to the girl until 2007, when he was arrested for downloading images of child abuse.

Along with the sick images police found on McCloud's computer, they also uncovered a folder of pictures of the young girl and a DVD containing footage of him abusing her, the court heard.

In what the sentencing judge branded "utterly depraved" and "abhorrent" abuse, officers discovered McCloud had drugged the girl with temazepam so he could rape her.

Jo Sidhu, for McCloud today, told the court a discretionary life sentence was not merited in his case, because he had restricted the abuse to one victim and not gone after other children.

Allowing McCloud's appeal and downgrading his sentence today, Mr Justice Treacy said: "We have reached the conclusion that, grave as these offences were, they were not so egregious as to require a term of life imprisonment."

Comments(7)

MaryWatford says...
4:17pm Fri 20 May 11

Lock him up and throw away the key. Horrid low life scum.

TRT says...
4:23pm Fri 20 May 11

So there *are* different types of rape after all.

The original judge was right. How can they say that the original offence was directed against one individual only when (1) he was caught because of his activity AFTER the original offence,
(2) Isn't one victim enough? This was a deliberate, meticulously planned attack, carried out overseas in an attempt to avoid being caught.

I hope the Crown prosecution appeals.

James Morrison says...
4:44pm Fri 20 May 11

I'm thinking... the chair... or the needle... or even a gas chamber... Rape can be considered worse than murderer because it's something the victim has to live with and be scarred by for the rest of their life. Doing something like that... & having proof of it for your own enjoyment later... that is just sick on such a deep level.

the blind bigot says...
5:45pm Fri 20 May 11

Shame this **** wasn't caught in India......He'd have been executed and
he'd have saved the tax-payers a whole load of cash.....

G_Whiz says...
11:52am Sat 21 May 11

So, if if does get out and goes on to abuse again (as so very often happens in these kind of cases) Could Jo Sidhu and Mr Treacy be prosecuted for aiding and abetting? Or they just too Naive to comprehend?
When are we really going to start to protect kids?

TRT says...
12:06pm Sat 21 May 11

I believe lawyers enjoy an immunity from prosecution related to the actions of their clients. If they didn't, no-one would be able to get representation.
With this ruling you could argue it would be his parole board responsible for reoffending if they released him. I agree he should be tried in Goa as well.
Verification words: rock-miss

hawkhorn says...
3:11pm Sat 21 May 11

How can rape, let alone rape of a child not be classed as SERIOUS! This evil little scum bag needs to be locked up forever, or bring back the death penalty.

Local Businesses

Most popular