News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Ambitious plans to save Watford Met station

Ambitious plans to save Watford Met station Ambitious plans to save Watford Met station

Plans are being drawn up to save the Watford Metropolitan station from closure once the Croxley Rail Link opens.

A group of councillors at Watford Borough Council is hoping to persuade London Underground chiefs to maintain a service from the station, on the Cassiobury estate, to Amersham.

The project is being spearheaded by Liberal Democrat Andy Wylie, who works for train operator First Group, as well as representatives from the area.

Councillor Wylie said retaining the service would benefit the people who used it now and that if London Underground could be convinced of its merits, it could be a realistic hope.

“What we are hoping to do is get people interested,” he said. “Then a feasibility study needs to take place.

“It would not be as frequent a service as the general Metropolitan Line, it would be somewhere in the region of every 20 minutes.”

As well as the benefits to those who lived near the station, Councillor Wylie said keeping a passenger service there could also present operational benefits for London Underground.

He said that in times of disruption, the extra station could help relieve pressure on the line.

Under the current Croxley Rail Link plans, the Watford Met looks likely to be sacrificed as the line gets redirected from Croxley station to Watford Junction.

The project, which has been talked about for decades, was set in motion in December when the government agreed the £76.24m to fund it.

As it stands, the service will run from Croxley station, to a new station on Ascot Road, a second new station in West Watford, then Watford High Street before terminating at Watford Junction.

London Underground has indicated that it plans to cease its passenger operation at Watford Met, but keep the track and platforms to use it for train storage.

The current costing of the rail link scheme have been drawn up on the basis that Watford Met is closed.

However the scheme is far from finalised and still has to go through an extensive consultation before final plans are drawn up.

Peter Jeffree, a councillor for Park ward in which the station is situated, said he supported the plan and hoped it would find support among rail users and residents.

He said: “The Croxley Rail Link is fantastic for Watford and I would not want anything to get in the way of that.

"But it seems fundamentally wrong to be closing a station when we should be encouraging people to use public transport.

“It seems like a brilliant idea and I hope it can gather a head of steam.”

Comments(12)

Andrew1963 says...
9:45am Fri 10 Feb 12

I think this is unlikely to succedd. On the positive side the plans include rolling styock station in the station (but closed to the public) so all the operational trackwork, etc will be retained. As will foot access through the station. But London Underground have a history of closing short stubs to the network - for example the Piccadilly line to Strand and this winter the District Line services to Kensington Olympia. So these sort of operations are uncommon. Can I also point out the the government has agreed to fund no more than £76.24 million. If the scheme comes in more than estimated by the clerks in county hall - and the council cannot find the money the link is not going to happen. The scheme is likely to cost more than £120 million, so the pressure will be on to cut things back not add in extras, desirable though they maybe

jamieparkins says...
10:04am Fri 10 Feb 12

Seems a momumental waste of time. Instead of protecting their property prices by keeping a limited service going, why can't residents simply walk the extra 10 mins down to the new station stop. Smacks of laziness to me.

Reg Edit says...
10:21am Fri 10 Feb 12

Hope it doesn't go ahead at all.

Watford already has excellent transport links, we don't need this and the government and council don't need to spend the money.

More wasting of taxes and vanity projects for the Mayor and MP.

nrlincoln says...
10:49am Fri 10 Feb 12

Reg Edit wrote:
Hope it doesn't go ahead at all.

Watford already has excellent transport links, we don't need this and the government and council don't need to spend the money.

More wasting of taxes and vanity projects for the Mayor and MP.
Spot on.

Nothing more to add!

TRT says...
11:10am Fri 10 Feb 12

The CRL has been a long time coming, and is of some benefit, but the cost is enormous. It's a shame that they threw out so many other schemes years ago, as transport technology has advanced quite a bit since the 80s.

It's easy to be cynical about preserving property prices, but by that argument, doesn't that mean that people value proximity to a transport hub? Which is why it's worth fighting to preserve them? No-one is asking for the Met to be preserved at the expense of the rest of the project.

Mike Watford says...
12:06pm Fri 10 Feb 12

Reg Edit wrote:
Hope it doesn't go ahead at all. Watford already has excellent transport links, we don't need this and the government and council don't need to spend the money. More wasting of taxes and vanity projects for the Mayor and MP.
The Rail Link is scheduled to bring tens and tens of millions of pounds of econmic benefit to Watford and south west Hertfordhire - a good thing

NottsReader says...
1:28pm Fri 10 Feb 12

The current station site is a 1930s anachronism that has no logical place in 21st Century Watford.

The continued opposition of local residents to the closure of “their” station seems almost entirely selfish – designed to sustain the value of wealthy residents’ houses.

This is understandable but hardly a valid reason to tinker with a scheme that will bring huge benefits to the town as a whole.

On another note, I for one don’t believe that house prices will be impacted at all. The area will remain the most desirable in the town regardless of the need for a 10 minute walk to an alternative station.

Might also be handy next time Twitter is alive with rumours about a great Watford Riot. Our friends from down south will arrive somewhere else.

anon34 says...
1:41pm Fri 10 Feb 12

Alot of people still use these station an awful lot. Have you been there when there is an event in cassiobury park it's rammed. The volume of people using the station can more than pay for it's up keep. Apart from that the station is a part of a very vibrate history of the town...does anyone remember the lovely old gate posts to the park?? be a shame if we lost the station too.

TRT says...
1:54pm Fri 10 Feb 12

Not everything in this life should be decided by logic. The station is a Grade II listed building and as anon34 points out is heavily used during events at the park. The entrance/exit statistics alone justify its retention. There are as many journeys made annually through Watford's gateline as through Croxley's and Moor Park's put together.

anon34 says...
1:58pm Fri 10 Feb 12

Thanks TRT just because people don't use that particular station themselves does not mean nobody uses at all. It's a long walk from any other station and not everyone in that area is rich enough to own a car or be able to make a long journey on foot to another station. The new stations should be an addition not a replacement.

TRT says...
2:10pm Fri 10 Feb 12

The privation statistics actually point to people living in the Cassiobury estate as being much more likely to have a car than people in West Watford. The danger here, I feel, is that the loss of this transport hub would make it *more* likely for Cassioburians to switch to a car, because it's more readily available to them.

I know that there are other, less-likely-to-be-af
fluent, pockets of residency in the town that use the Met, e.g. parts of Rickmansworth Road, Cassio Road.

I've always advocated the CRL should be by way of a LRT guided bus, which could detour round the business park under operator control and, similarly, run to the met station. It would be advantageous (for automated operation) to run that track via a Two Bridges fly-over into the back of the Met station, utilising two of the disused train-roads there, but not essential, given the enormous cost of such a structure.

Bloodwags says...
2:29am Thu 1 Mar 12

Interested to know how Mike Watford measures the "tens of millions of pounds of econmic benefit to Watford and south west Hertfordhire" CRL is "scheduled" to bring - I don't think anyone has yet PROVED any economic benefit whatsoever. According to the case made for CRL, much of this will be from new shoppers attracted to Watford from places further south down the Met Line like Pinner & Northwood (who presumably shop in Harrow at present?). Assuming for now that the "tens of millions" referred to (gross turnover per annum?) are in fact just twofold (£20m) and that half of this comes from retail, this amounts to £200k per week so if the AVERAGE weekly spend per person the Harlequin is £100 then 2,000 EXTRA travellers per week (men, women & children) who wouldn't otherwise have come to Watford by bus, car or other means would need to be attracted via CRL. To my mind that seems more than a little ambitious!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree