Former Watford MP Claire Ward claims News of the World contributed to the loss of her baby

Watford’s former MP Claire Ward has claimed press intrusion into her personal life by The News of the World may have contributed to the death of her unborn baby in 2005.

Mrs Ward served as Labour MP for the town from 1997 until she was voted out in the 2010 General Election, she also served as Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice.

In a written submission to the Leveson Inquiry into media ethics, Mrs Ward claims she was contacted by a reporter from the now defunct Sunday tabloid in December 2004 while on holiday in Riga.

She alleges the reporter made unspecified allegations which she describes as “entirely false” and says the story was never published after her solicitors obtained an agreement from the paper.

She goes on to say: “I was pregnant at this time and this stress whilst we were away had an impact on my health.

“I was under enormous stress from this threat. Following the general election in May 2005, my baby was stillborn.

“I cannot help but think that the stress I was placed under in the early stages of my pregnancy, particularly during my stay in Riga, may have contributed to the eventual loss of my baby.”

Mrs Ward became the country’s youngest female MP in Parliament when she was elected in 1997 aged 24 and was subjected to “false and untrue reporting” by national publications running a “misogynistic agenda”.

She also recounts being threatened by another senior journalist at the News International tabloid in February2001.

The reporter, who is not identified in papers, contacted her to say the paper intended to run a story alleging she had behaved inappropriately with a Royal Marines captain nicknamed “Captain Hunk” during a trip to Kosovo.

When she denied the claims she said the journalist became aggressive and quoted him as saying "I brought Robin Cook down and I am going to bring you down”.

"He told me that if I challenged the story he would make things much worse for me. I repeated my denials and ended the phone call and went to attend a constituency engagement," she added.

After her repeated denials, Mrs Ward was contacted by then-editor Rebekah Wade (nee Brooks) who agreed to make some changes and give the article a lower profile than initially intended but Mrs Ward said she was left feeling that was the best she could hope for.

Reflecting on media ethics as a whole, the former MP said she did not object to the media’s coverage of political stories but felt confronted by an “intense and repeated interest” in her personal life.

I believe that we have to have a much clearer set of rules for the conduct of the media.

Mrs Ward concludes: “I believe that we have to have a much clearer set of rules for the conduct of the media.

“For a politician, seeking public confidence, this power to destroy is the most dangerous of any that the media have.

“During my 13 years in Parliament, News International in particular held an iron grip over our politics.

“In all the difficulties that I had, I knew that I could not rely upon my party or my colleagues to take on News International and I was in no position to do so.”

Since leaving office Mrs Ward has become a director at the International Pharmacy Federation.

Comments(25)

factfinding says...
1:31pm Sun 9 Sep 12

sorry, did you just put that Riga was in Iceland?

LSC says...
3:39pm Sun 9 Sep 12

factfinding wrote:
sorry, did you just put that Riga was in Iceland?
Everyone knows it is in Bejams.

JohnnyHornet says...
5:52pm Sun 9 Sep 12

careful, News of the World, I feel a lawsuit coming....

Reg Edit says...
10:54pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Claire,

just disappear gracefully. We have had too much of you already, no more, please.

drunkenduck says...
12:49am Mon 10 Sep 12

"She alleges the reporter made unspecified allegations which she describes as “entirely false”.

What that she brought a second home within walking distance of house of parliament or somewhere in London, paid by tax payers and she was more interested what she gain from our allowances, then given a toss about Watford & local folks. Yep, entirely false... 'cough', yea right.

LSC says...
1:17am Mon 10 Sep 12

Of course; I am sorry she had to go through a terrible time. But you know what? Us peasants do too.
I didn't suffer in Latvia (or Iceland). I couldn't afford it.

Toshhorn says...
9:05am Mon 10 Sep 12

go away

garston tony says...
9:07am Mon 10 Sep 12

Losing a child cant have been easy but i'm sorry to sound harsh this is streching it a bit isnt it?

There were six months between the call and losing the child it seems and surely the fact (mentioned only in passing by her as if it wasnt important in what saddly happened) that she was running for re election with all the worry, stress, long hours and hard work that THAT must have entailed had far more to do with the sad event?

stuegs says...
9:35am Mon 10 Sep 12

Of course losing a baby is dreadful, but....

I wonder how much stress her self centred decisions caused her constituants. I wonder how much stress she caused others as she trod on them on her way up the ranks. I wonder how much stress her lies have caused people and her stealing from the taxpayer has cost us.

A bit of a strenuous link, not sure that one holds water.

Nick Lincoln says...
10:10am Mon 10 Sep 12

She was probably also stressed when it was discovered that, despite living less than 30miles from Westminster, she claimed over £90,000 in second home allowances.

Perhaps this was why she was one of 98 MPs to vote in favour of legislation to make MP expenses private and not for public scrutiny.

It certainly wasn't stress brought on by a long-career in the real world. After joining Young Labour she was immersed in the party machine since her teens (three years as a trainee solicitor does not count as a hard slog).

And now where's she "working"? At the IFP, which, in it's own words "..sets global pharmacy standards through professional and scientific guidelines, policy statements and declarations, as well as through its collaboration with other international organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and other United Nations agencies."

Who'd of thought it? Mrs Ward is "working" for another useless bloody quango that liaises with various useless bloody quangos.

Once it's left the station it seems really, really hard to get off that good old gravy train. I sense an EU position for Mrs Ward in good time.

Honest Rog says...
11:37am Mon 10 Sep 12

Notice how most of the above posters say "Losing a baby's a shame" and then go on to say "but" as they queue up to give Claire a kicking. In my experience she was a good constituency MP.
Further, notice that none of the above have a bad word to say about the Murdoch corporation. That for me speaks volumes in that UK has been dumbed down to a nation of small minded bigots by the vile Murdochs.

Taxidermist says...
12:09pm Mon 10 Sep 12

LSC wrote:
Of course; I am sorry she had to go through a terrible time. But you know what? Us peasants do too.
I didn't suffer in Latvia (or Iceland). I couldn't afford it.
Riga (Latvian: Rīga, pronounced ( listen)) is the capital and largest city of Latvia

Taxidermist says...
12:16pm Mon 10 Sep 12

Taxidermist wrote:
LSC wrote:
Of course; I am sorry she had to go through a terrible time. But you know what? Us peasants do too.
I didn't suffer in Latvia (or Iceland). I couldn't afford it.
Riga (Latvian: Rīga, pronounced ( listen)) is the capital and largest city of Latvia
Of course Riga isn't pronounced (listen) it's pronounced Ree ga.

LSC says...
12:50pm Mon 10 Sep 12

Taxidermist wrote:
LSC wrote:
Of course; I am sorry she had to go through a terrible time. But you know what? Us peasants do too.
I didn't suffer in Latvia (or Iceland). I couldn't afford it.
Riga (Latvian: Rīga, pronounced ( listen)) is the capital and largest city of Latvia
I am aware of that, but the WO weren't. The story has been edited, it previously said Riga was in Iceland, so I was having a little joke.

MJ1 says...
1:56pm Mon 10 Sep 12

It would appear that mysoginy is not confined to hacks at the NoW judging by some of the moronic comments posted in response to this article. Mind you I expect they would even be able to spell the word let alone know what it means!

Sara says...
8:17am Tue 11 Sep 12

I believe it’s spelt MISOGYNY, Mike...

However misogyny is defined as the hatred of women. However hateful some of these comments may be, they are not aimed at Claire Ward because of her gender. The fact that her complaint centres on a loss of pregnancy, something which although physically sustained by the mother is just as much a loss to both parents, does not mean that the follow-up comments are sexist or misogynistic.

The loss of a pregnancy is a terrible thing for everyone who has had to endure it. For some, it happens more than once. And every parent who goes through miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death deserves support. But as far as I can see, the comments here are aimed at other aspects of Claire Ward’s life that readers have taken a dislike to.

I happen to be of the belief that we’d all be a lot better off if less hate and bile were expended on others on this web site and elsewhere. But Newsquest and its readership prefer it otherwise. That’s a shame, but it’s not necessarily sexist – or worse.

Reg Edit says...
10:05am Tue 11 Sep 12

Honest Rog wrote:
Notice how most of the above posters say "Losing a baby's a shame" and then go on to say "but" as they queue up to give Claire a kicking. In my experience she was a good constituency MP.
Further, notice that none of the above have a bad word to say about the Murdoch corporation. That for me speaks volumes in that UK has been dumbed down to a nation of small minded bigots by the vile Murdochs.
Rog (I have removed the "honest" just in case)

that was not my experience of Claire. I had the misfortune to call on her to help and found her to be lofty and obnoxious and completely disinterested. I can't stand her, she seemed totally self-obsessed.

I can only think you are the exception to the rule or a Labour supporter - probably the latter. Either way, I would say you are dead wrong. She was a lousy constituency MP, out for herself and stuff anyone else. The worst sort of person to be given a position of power and we are well rid of her. Good riddance!

I don't agree with Tricky (our current MP) on many things, but having met him several times he does seem at least to be a decent human being.

The Murdoch (and other) press has a disturbing, murky side that needs reining back, but other papers like the Telegraph, through foul means, managed to bring parliament to its knees over MPs expenses whilst dodgy freeloaders like Claire tried to keep their expenses misdeeds secret.

You know what? I'd have a thousand Murdochs in positions of power before I'd have one Claire Ward back. She is a disgrace, a blot on the town of Watford's history. As I said before, good riddance to her!

Reg Edit says...
10:17am Tue 11 Sep 12

MJ1 wrote:
It would appear that mysoginy is not confined to hacks at the NoW judging by some of the moronic comments posted in response to this article. Mind you I expect they would even be able to spell the word let alone know what it means!
Hilarious, or did you purposefully mis-spell Misogyny?

We don't hate CW the woman, we hated having CW the MP, who was a loud part of the discredited Labour Party that ruined the country and left us in huge debt.

Obnoxious is a word that I can not only spell but I can also accurately apply to CW.

I don't know if she is now playing for public sympathy or compensation. She deserves neither.

Sara says...
10:17am Tue 11 Sep 12

I cannot think of one MP*, past or present, that I would rather lose for Rupert Murdoch and his murky press.
For all our undemocratic system of election, MPs can be democratically hired and fired.

*Actually on further though I can think of three such MPs, none of whom have served Watford. But the general principle still stands.

Reg Edit says...
10:44am Tue 11 Sep 12

Sara wrote:
I cannot think of one MP*, past or present, that I would rather lose for Rupert Murdoch and his murky press.
For all our undemocratic system of election, MPs can be democratically hired and fired.

*Actually on further though I can think of three such MPs, none of whom have served Watford. But the general principle still stands.
No-one forces you to read the Murdoch papers for five years without respite.

Sara says...
11:31am Tue 11 Sep 12

That's a really daft comment, Reg. the effect of the Murdoch press on society went well beyond its readership.

Nick Lincoln says...
11:50am Tue 11 Sep 12

As an aside, the Labour party courted Murdoch and his empire incessantly from 1992 onwards.

His stable of "newspapers" lent their weight behind Labour in the 1997 election, a key factor in the party's success.

The effects of that disastrous regime truly are still being felt at all levels of society, and will be for decades to come. Far more pernicious than anything the News of The Word ever did, no matter how vile that (best selling) comic was.


Given this, it seems a little disingenuous that the bile now vented against Murdoch seems to come more from those who lean toward socialism than libertarianism. I may be wrong on this (often am!) but the bleeding hearts of Islington seem more put out by Mr Murdoch than other interested parties - although they couldn't kiss his ring enough in 1997.

Claire Ward: you play with the devil, you play by his rules, no matter how foul.

garston tony says...
12:27pm Tue 11 Sep 12

Wether Ward was a good MP or not isnt relevant here.

She has made a claim that the sad loss of a unborn child is down to a member of the press. There is nothing wrong with showing empathy for her and her partners loss and yet not agreeing with her conclusions.

Thats where the 'but' comes in. As I said there was quite a time gap between the incident with the reporter and losing the child and in between she stood for re election which must surely have had a far bigger impact on her pregnancy and took place far nearer to the sad loss.

I believe that some of the press have a lot to answer for but I disagree, the information we have been presented with, with our former MP's conclusion.

Linda Geddes says...
3:55pm Tue 11 Sep 12

garston tony wrote:
Wether Ward was a good MP or not isnt relevant here. She has made a claim that the sad loss of a unborn child is down to a member of the press. There is nothing wrong with showing empathy for her and her partners loss and yet not agreeing with her conclusions. Thats where the 'but' comes in. As I said there was quite a time gap between the incident with the reporter and losing the child and in between she stood for re election which must surely have had a far bigger impact on her pregnancy and took place far nearer to the sad loss. I believe that some of the press have a lot to answer for but I disagree, the information we have been presented with, with our former MP's conclusion.
Well said Tony.

sffca says...
9:49pm Sun 23 Sep 12

Unfortunately and tragically there was a loss but in the world of politics if politics comes above home and family accidents happen One has to take it easier during pregnancy especially during the early stages and jumping on the press complaints bandwagon later is disgraceful but not unexpected.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree