Local authority mortgage scheme delayed

First-time buyers scheme delayed First-time buyers scheme delayed

A scheme to use council cash to help first-time buyers in Watford get on the property ladder has been hit by delays.

At a meeting last night, politicians heard that the local authority mortgage scheme, which will help reduce deposit sizes for borrowers, has run into legal problems and is yet to have its funding agreed.

The news comes as councillors expressed scepticism about the scheme that will only help around 30 people in the town.

Last night Watford Borough Council ’s ruling cabinet agreed to pursue the scheme, which will help people secure mortgages of up £190,000 on properties worth up to £200,000.

The scheme is aimed at first time buyers who would have been eligible for a 95 per cent mortgage before the recession.

This means buyers would have only be asked for five per cent of the value of the house up front as a deposit. So on a £200,000 property they would only have to find £10,000 as a deposit.

However, a report said since the banking crisis, the maximum that lenders were prepared to give was 75 per cent mortgages, meaning the prospective buyers of a £200,000 property would now have to find £50,000 upfront.

The idea of the scheme is to close the gap by councils guaranteeing the difference between the 75 per cent and 95 per cent deposit meaning those who were eligible for the cheaper deposit before the recession can still obtain one.

Conservative councillor Steve Johnson said he was sceptical about the need for the scheme as his son had just bought his first house and they had found many banks and building societies willing to provide 90 per cent mortgages.

He said: "This (lenders only willing to give) 75 per cent was true six month ago, but I question the need for this now.

"PR-wise it is fine, but realistically it doesn’t go anywhere."

Dorothy Thornhill, Watford’s Liberal Democrat elected mayor, also voiced scepticism over the effectiveness of the scheme.

She said: "I am sceptical about this scheme and schemes that governments come up with in order to make it sound like they are solving a problem when you hear it on the Today programme.

"I am cynical about schemes that only help a few people. But good luck to the 30 people who get on this scheme."

Councillor Nigel Bell , the leader of the Labour group, added that he agreed the council needed to be cautious with the scheme but thought it should do something to help first-time buyers.

In Hertfordshire the county council is funding the project and has earmarked £12m for it, with £2m going to its own scheme and £1m to each of the county’s districts and boroughs.

Only a number of banks are participating in the scheme and Hertfordshire County Council and Watford has opted to partner with Lloyds TSB.

However a report said there was a hold-up with scheme as Lloyds had asked each of the councils involved to provide a letter confirming it has all the legal powers required to participate.

Watford Borough Council said it had concerns about the letter and was possibly looking at switching its scheme to The Leeds Building Society, which has a branch in the town.

Borough officers also said the agreement to secure the £1m from the county council was not yet in place.

Comments(6)

TRT says...
11:24am Tue 18 Sep 12

It's OK. WBC are building these people a new bridge to sleep under. All the mod cons, running water, gravity etc.

Hornets number 12 fan says...
11:45am Tue 18 Sep 12

TRT wrote:
It's OK. WBC are building these people a new bridge to sleep under. All the mod cons, running water, gravity etc.
What happened to all the millions of pounds that were raised by selling off council houses? Squandered by central Government instead of beind reinvested into affordable housing as it should have been. This in istself is a SCANDAL. This pond area redevelopement is a waste of public money and should be scrapped!

Reg Edit says...
11:47am Tue 18 Sep 12

Councillor Bell, and all the others.

WHY should the council do something to help first-time buyers?

If first-time buyers are not subsidised to get on the housing ladder, then either houses are overpriced and will eventually correct, or they are not wealthy enough to buy.

If banks don't think lending 90% is a good idea, and think it is too much of a risk, then why does the council think it is a good idea and presumably not a risk of our taxes? I know who I would trust more on financial matters such as mortgage risk.

Could it be that as it's not their money, they don't care and it will help them look nicer?

Stop wasting our money, especially in a recession!

TRT says...
11:51am Tue 18 Sep 12

The market correction in the housing sector is one of the things destabilising an economy too heavily reliant on speculative property investments rather than manufacturing.

Reg Edit says...
11:54am Tue 18 Sep 12

TRT wrote:
The market correction in the housing sector is one of the things destabilising an economy too heavily reliant on speculative property investments rather than manufacturing.
Houses are still historically overpriced and should fall another 20-40%.

All these schemes do is keep the bubble inflated and keep prices high, and that does not help first-time buyers in general.

This is a crazy scheme to invest taxpayers money into. Crazy.

TRT says...
12:01pm Tue 18 Sep 12

Exactly. The threat of a market correction, even one as gentle as a multiple year stagnation of house prices, is panicking the domestic investment arms of the banks who then clam up the purse strings and stymie the flow of money around the economy. Hence these schemes to try and alleviate this. Trouble is, there isn't enough money in the world for this to work! It's a distant cousin of pyramid selling.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree