- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Observer_Owl
Follow Watford Observer on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Watford Observer
Like us on Facebook
Accident verdict after woman dies when wardrobe falls on top of her (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Inquest told bracket holding wardrobe to wall at Watford nursing home failed
3:10pm Wednesday 26th September 2012 in News
By Adam Binnie, Senior Reporter
A woman who suffered from dementia died after a wardrobe fell on top of her in a Watford nursing home.
Claire Hughes was born in Edgware in 1946 and died six days before her 65th birthday, on December 23 last year.
She was found lying underneath a wardrobe in her bedroom after a bracket holding it to the wall failed.
At an inquest into her death today, psychologist Dr Mardell confirmed that Mrs Hughes had early onset dementia, and was being cared for in the Chase Care Centre, in Printers Avenue.
Marjorie Blackwood, a registered nurse and unit manager at the home, explained that part of Mrs Hughes's condition made her "obsessed" with clothing.
She would put on layer after layer and would resist having them removed, which could lead to overheating or present a trip hazard.
She said: "When Claire was admitted she was restless, agitated and would not eat or drink. She needed a lot of care and attention.
"She was obsessed with clothes and would over-dress. She knew her clothes and if she saw any of them in the laundry she would pull them off the rail."
Her wardrobe was locked by a chain and padlock provided by her husband Christopher, a retired company director, to prevent her from opening it when left alone in her room.
Ms Blackwood said on December 23 last year, she was taking Mrs Hughes' medicine and some orange juice to her room.
She said: "When I pushed the door open I could see the wardrobe lying on top of her. I screamed, called for help and pushed the emergency button."
An ambulance was called while CPR was administered, but by the time paramedic Vivienne Yendell arrived, it was already too late.
Pathologist Dr Korestoff concluded the weight of the furniture would have restricted Mrs Hughes' ability to breathe, and named the cause of death as compressive asphyxia.
Ms Blackwood said: "I was shocked and saddened. During her time with us she had improved so much and I had built up a rapport with her and her family."
Sandra Dias, a Health and Safety Executive inspector was called to Ms Hughes' room to inspect the fallen wardrobe.
She found that the nursing home's furniture, which was installed five years ago, was secured to the wall using screws and an L shaped bracket.
The screw holding the bracket to the wall had only penetrated the plasterboard, not the masonry behind, and the holes in the wall were larger than the screw.
The bracket was found still attached to the wall, and had failed at the point where it was fixed to the wardrobe.
The left hand door of the wardrobe had also been partially removed by the force of Mrs Hughes pulling on it.
The home's wardrobes are now secured with longer screws that are fixed into the concrete wall, and the point where it attaches to the wardrobe has been reinforced with wood.
Coroner Edward Thomas recorded an accidental death, and added: "None of you would know the wall-plug didn't go into concrete.
"Claire's problem was unusual and when the wardrobes were fixed to the wall it would have been with the purpose of not falling over.
"With DIY, we all sometimes put things in not quite as secure as they should be."
Comments(9)
Smilingburkinshaw
says...
5:34pm Wed 26 Sep 12
Nascot
says...
8:19pm Wed 26 Sep 12
Reg Edit wrote:Blimy Reg you seem to be an expert in everything.
This wasn't DIY, this was a professional care home and someone competent and/or professional should have screwed it to the wall securely. The coroner may not be a competent DIY-er, but whoever did it should have been a professional. A professional would know if the screw went into the masonry or not, and so in my opinion there is a clear negligence here by the care home because the fixing had not been done with due care and attention. It seems the coroner has been a bit casual about this negligence, not even recognising it as negligence. His last comment defies belief. If it had been a hotel or an office would the coroner say the same thing?
Reg Edit
says...
8:28pm Wed 26 Sep 12
Nascot wrote:Why thank you Nascot, but I'm not expert in everything.
Reg Edit wrote:Blimy Reg you seem to be an expert in everything.
This wasn't DIY, this was a professional care home and someone competent and/or professional should have screwed it to the wall securely. The coroner may not be a competent DIY-er, but whoever did it should have been a professional. A professional would know if the screw went into the masonry or not, and so in my opinion there is a clear negligence here by the care home because the fixing had not been done with due care and attention. It seems the coroner has been a bit casual about this negligence, not even recognising it as negligence. His last comment defies belief. If it had been a hotel or an office would the coroner say the same thing?
I do know all about drilling holes in walls though.
linney
says...
3:23am Thu 27 Sep 12
Reg Edit
says...
8:46am Thu 27 Sep 12
it's a sad accident and I would not wish to intrude on the family's grief. I did however make a salient point about there being a likely negligence on the part of the care home.
That is not only something to say, it is something relevant to say.
Neither Nascot nor myself, who often disagree on matters, have made any rants on this post.
Have you actually read what I said? I really don't know where you're coming from on this.
I have made my point re negligence above, and so would not have been commenting on this post again unless I had something relevant to say.
garston tony
says...
12:35pm Thu 27 Sep 12
Reg all I would say is that whilst the length of screws and wall type etc. was noted by the coroner the bracket actually remained in the wall, it was the point that it was attached to the wardrobe itself that apparently failed (making the point about screw length/wall type a redundant one).
I would also say that if the poor lady had managed to partially remove one of the wardrobe doors in her attempts to open it then its likely that she was exerting considerable force on the wardrobe. The wardrobe was possibly therefore being rocked back and forward with repeated pressure being applied to the point that failed, something it is unlikely to have been designed for (I would imagine a topple, a single jolt and hold
would be the scenario that this is meant to cater for, not a conserted effort against it).
highhigh
says...
9:14pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Smilingburkinshaw wrote:If the care centre were trying or attempting to do the right thing they clearly have not succeeded. The bracket was fitted to prevent the wardrobe from tipping over. as the wardrobe did tip over The care centre must be negligent.
Maybe by law they dont have to fix the wadrobe but did so in an attempt to make it more secure due to this womans condition. Maybe they were trying to do the right thing. Who's to say a professional didnt do it? I do agree though that once it was decided to fix the wadrobes to the wall it should have been done properly.
When the coroner stated "With DIY, we all sometimes put things in not quite as secure as they should be." This is completely disrespectful to the family!
G_Whiz
says...
11:18pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Reg Edit says...
4:55pm Wed 26 Sep 12
The coroner may not be a competent DIY-er, but whoever did it should have been a professional. A professional would know if the screw went into the masonry or not, and so in my opinion there is a clear negligence here by the care home because the fixing had not been done with due care and attention.
It seems the coroner has been a bit casual about this negligence, not even recognising it as negligence. His last comment defies belief.
If it had been a hotel or an office would the coroner say the same thing?