Croxley Rail Link public inquiry: Live (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Croxley Rail Link public inquiry: Live
9:22am Tuesday 9th October 2012 in News
By Adam Binnie, Senior Reporter
Enable automatic updates every 30 seconds? YES NO
Latest
- Public inquiry into Croxley Rail Link scheme opens today.
- Nathalie Levin QC, speaking for Hertfordshire County Council and London Underground, says keeping Watford Met Station open 'makes no sense'.
- Cassiobury residents dispute the time savings made by passengers travelling from Ascot Road.
- Hertfordshire County Council will foot the bill if the project goes over-budget.
- London Underground boss says keeping Watford met open would have an adverse effect on the whole line.
4:30pm
Michael Fish suggested that although the journey to Rickmansworth is shorter, trains will take longer to turn there than in Watford met because they have to be taken into the sidings.
Mr Foley argued: "The time for the driver to change ends is consistent wherever we change.
"There is a length of time it will take to run a train into a siding and back out, but irrespective, we would have longer to turn the trains around than at Watford met."
Mr Foley said although Rickmansworth was the preferred station to turn the trains around, it was not the only option.
He added: "There are other locations such as in Moor Park where we would have even longer."
4:28pm
Both councillor Derbyshire and Cassiobury resident Michael Fish are arguing the case for Watford met to be kept open to allow Croxley Rail Link trains to be reversed there.
4:14pm
Park ward councillor George Derbyshire is currently questioning Keith Foley.
He said: “The heart of the matter is the number of trains per hour delivered on the metropolitan line as a whole and how that impacts on Watford.
“During peak time, under the sub-service railway upgrade, you intend to meet 28 trains per hour through Finchley Road.
“This project is four trains per hour short. Your preferred option is to insert them through Rickmansworth.
“Seeing as there’s some merit in retaining Watford met station, why can’t you insert those four trains into Watford met?”
Mr Foley said: “Watford met is further from Moor Park than Rickmansworth, meaning an additional running time of three minutes from Watford met.
“This would mean we would have a lower scheduled layover time on terminus, reducing reliability on the whole line.”
Councillor Derbyshire asked whether the additional time could not be “squeezed in” somewhere.
Mr Foley said: “When we talk about 30 seconds here or there, in a room like this it doesn’t sound like much, but on a complex rail network that could be critical.
“We could run that service; we could not operate that service reliably.”
3:55pm
Mr Foley explained that equipment used at Watford met station will be used in Ascot Road.
He was asked how both stations could be open at the same time, using the same ticket gates.
He suggested that either Watford met station would be run without ticket gates, or there would be a weekend closure while the equipment was moved.
3:42pm
Mr Foley explained the effect of a split service on the timing of metropolitan line trains.
He said: “Reversing trains in the met station would result in about 30 percent of Watford met and Watford Junction trains starting their next southbound journey late.”
3:40pm
Although the station will close, London Underground will retain the track in Cassiobury to use for stabling and emergency reversing at times of “severe service perturbation”.
3:38pm
With a six trains per hour service, the Croxley Rail Link can be described as a “turn-up-and-go” service rather than a timetabled one.
Mr Foley said this service “delivers significantly greater passenger benefits, both perceived and actual, than a timetabled service.”
3:20pm
He said: "From an operational perspective, the continued use of Watford met as a terminus station would have an adverse impact on the train service capacity and reliability on the remainder of the Metropolitan line."
3:19pm
Keith Foley, head of transport planning, London Underground Ltd, is speaking now as we're ahead of schedule.
3:18pm
2:44pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Nigel Spate says
Let be positive - How many more residents will be within the 800m of the Ascot Road and Watford Health Campus stations, when the line is built?
2:37pm
Mary French, from Cassiobury, said: "I live quite close to the (Watford met) station and it takes me five minutes to walk there.
"I walked to Ascot Road the other day, I took the nearest route down Gade Avenue and Rickmansworth Road where I had to wait at a pelican crossing, and down Whippendell Road to the next pelican crossing where I also had to wait.
"It took me at least 20 minutes and I was walking quite fast."
2:32pm
Mr Hunter defended the earlier mentioned walking times to Watford met and the proposed Ascot Road station.
He said: "Distances and times have been checked and are robust".
2:23pm
Public gallery shocked by Steve Hunter's mention of Hertfordshire County Council being responsible for any financial over-run, "just like any other DfT project" he says.
2:09pm
Most of Mr Fish's questions have been deferred to Keith Foley, head of transport planning, London Underground Ltd, who is due to speak tomorrow.
2:04pm
Mr Fish asked: “Has any consideration been given to those people in Cassio Metro that will in the future be disadvantaged by the noise of the late night and early morning train movement but are not beneficiaries of the train movement?”
The question was deferred to another speaker.
2:02pm
He added that the A412 was a “less secure” route to school for children.
2:01pm
Michael Fish, from Cassiobury Park Avenue, opened proceedings after lunch by suggesting that “the notices for the closure of the met station didn’t go up until after councilor George Derbyshire had asked London underground the question about the closure. Notices started to appear 24 hours later. The process is fraught with a number of difficulties.”
1:01pm
Breaking for lunch now, back at 1.40pm.
12:41pm
The number of people easily able to reach a metropolitan line station will increase by thousands under the Croxley Rail Link.
Mr Hunter said: “The scheme brings an additional 5,100 residents to within 800m of a new met line station, or 14,300 including Watford High Street and Watford Junction.
“3,700 residents currently within 800 metres of Watford met would be more than 800 metres from the new stations [if Watford met closes], although the distance to Ascot Road for these passengers is less than many met line users currently travel.
“The total number of residents within easy distance of a met line station increases with the introduction to the scheme.”
12:30pm
12:29pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT says
@Mr Hunter.
I hope your traffic studies include the impact of an extra 302 pedestrian crossings of Whippendell Road and Rickmansworth Road during the rush hour.
12:27pm
Very busy in the public inquiry, despite this only being day one.
12:23pm
Mr Hunter said the closure of the met station would mean it would take Watford Grammar School for Boys pupils an extra six minutes to walk from Ascot Road.
He said: “The walk would increase from six minutes and a quarter minutes to 12 minutes, but this would be offset by the train journey to Ascot Road being one minute quicker.”
The closure would also increase the journey time to Cassiobury Park by 14 minutes.
However, journeys to the town centre would be reduced by 19 minutes, to the hospital by ten minutes, to West Herts College by four minutes, and to Watford Grammar School for Girls by 17 minutes.
Mr Hunter said the impact of the closure on journey times was “positive overall”.
12:02pm
This map shows the location of the met station, Watford Grammar School for Boys, and the approximate sites for the two potential new stations.
11:57am
A study of the usage of Watford met is being discussed. On average, 2,540 people use the station in the week, and 895 on the weekend.
A figure of 70 people using Watford met station to get to and from Watford Grammar School of Boys on a daily basis was disputed by London TravelWatch, which claimed it was more like 200.
A further study was done, which established about 302 people aged under 18-years-old used the station between 7am and 9am and 3pm and 5pm.
Mr Hunter said it was “prudent” to assume most of these were students of Watford Grammar School.
11:50am
Mr Hunter is now examining the journey times of the new rail link.
He said: “The number of passengers benefitting from a reduced journey time considerably exceeds the relatively small number of existing passengers whose overall journey time increases because of the closure of Watford Met station.
“For example, 28,333 additional residents would have Met Line journey times between 60-80 minutes, whereas 2,215 who previously were within this time band would now have longer journey times.”
11:44am
Mr Hunter said keeping Watford met station open would “invalidate the current funding, delay the scheme and add further potential risks to the project.”
11:38am
Steve Hunter, associate with Steer Davies Gleave, is examining the effect the rail link will have on traffic in Watford.
He said: “In two locations the forecast peak hour traffic flows would increase by more than five percent because of the scheme.
“In eight locations the forecast traffic flow decreases by more than five percent. Overall, just under 300 peak hour car journeys are removed from the local road network.
“The overall net impact on the highway network is assessed as being a modest benefit.”
11:38am
11:15am Tue 9 Oct 12
mrn_wfc says
It time to start building the Rail link and stop all this debating. Its something the town desperately needs. West Watford is in Dire Need of Re-generation. West watford line has been closed since 96 and the area has been rotting away ever since. We still have disused land on tolpits lane near the old station where scammel lorries used to be.
Its time to Start building and re-generate Watford. Losing Watford Met line is no big loss as you reap the benefits of 3 new stations and linked to Watford Junction.
11:29am
A Cassiobury Park residents speaks about the effect the closure of the Met line station will have on her.
11:21am
Park ward councillor George Derbyshire suggested that Met line upgrades would bring ten trains an hour to the station in Cassiobury Park.
He said: “The 2,500 people using Watford Met station will not have the advantage of those ten trains per hour, as under this proposal the maximum would be only six trains per hour.
“I think it is rather perverse that a project costing hundreds of millions of pounds will deliver an inferior service compared to that service they would have got under sub-service upgrade.”
11:02am
This image shows the proposed route of the rail link and new stations, and the closure of Watford Metropolitan station.
10:57am
Speaking to Ms Glaud, Michael Fish, from Cassiobury Park Avenue, said: “In your statement you say that the county council has always been supportative of the scheme, and you describe the scheme including the closure of Watford met station.
"Are you saying Hertfordshire County Council has always supported the close of Watford met station? Was there a policy decision to close the station?”
Ms Glaud said: “The scheme is based on providing a better service for all users, meaning the Watford met station would have to close. To have a better service and to meet funding approval we had to close the met station.
"For Croxley Rail Link to proceed, Watford met would have to close. It was on that basis that we got funding.”
10:49am
Roxanne Glaud, from the county council, is explaining the problems with traffic congestion in Watford.
She said: "Many of the major trunk roads have high and increasing traffic volumes. Some are at or over capacity, leading to rat running in local streets.
"This is unattractive to enable economic growth in the town.
"There is a lack of link between the west of the town and the central and eastern part of the town.
"Roads and cars have to meet these demands, and the road network in the west does not provide effective access to the south, placing more pressure on the town centre."
10:28am
10:12am Tue 9 Oct 12
Reg Edit says
The Rover wrote:I don't live on the Cassiobury and I will miss Watford Met if it goes. It's not a private station, it's open to all residents of Watford and is used by residents from outside the Cassiobury quite extensively.
Putting aside the concerns of a handful of Cassiobury residents this can only be good for Watford as a whole.
It's unfair to label this as a Cassiobury issue.
10:28am
“The most controversial element of the project,” says Nathalie Levin QC, “is the closure of Watford Met Station.
“Keeping Watford Met station open makes no sense either operationally or in terms of passenger benefits.
“A large population of the existing users of Watford Met live as close, if not closer, to station served on the new line.
“Ultimately, the number of those disbenefited by a split service [keeping the Met station open] would well outnumber those benefitting.
“Such a decision would throw the entire future of the project into considerable doubt.”
10:28am
“The most controversial element of the project,” says Nathalie Levin QC, “is the closure of Watford Met Station.
“Keeping Watford Met station open makes no sense either operationally or in terms of passenger benefits.
“A large population of the existing users of Watford Met live as close, if not closer, to station served on the new line.
“Ultimately, the number of those disbenefited by a split service [keeping the Met station open] would well outnumber those benefitting.
“Such a decision would throw the entire future of the project into considerable doubt.”
10:23am
In her statement Roxanne Glaud from the county council will describe how Watford is an area of Hertfordshire which has underperformed economically and where East to West traffic is increasingly difficult.
She says the project will provide significantly improved public transport opportunities to a large residential population around the new stations and will make it far easier to travel west to east across the area.
She will also describe how it will open up employment opportunities, improve access to Watford town centre and enable easier public transport options for those areas of West Watford where car ownership is lowest, with up to 80 percent lacking access to a car.
10:19am
Nathalie Levin QC, reading an opening statement, said: "The Croxley Rail Link will provide a major enhancement of public transport services across Watford and improve both accessibility to those services and connectivity between services."
10:15am
A few housekeeping matters are being dealt with. There are about 20 members of the public here for the opening statements today.
10:02am
The inquiry, held in the Elton John conference centre in Vicarage Road Stadium, is now open.
9:55am
Speaking for the promoters today are Roxanne Glaud, from the county council, presenting the scheme background, and Steve Hunter, from Steer Davies Gleave, speaking about the transport case.
Michael Fish, from Cassiobury Park Avenue, will be speaking for the residents of Cassiobury.
9:43am
The scheme could see Watford Metropolitan Station closed to passengers. However there has been a separate public inquiry on that issue and Boris Johnson will be making the final decision later this year.
9:38am
Transport bosses are due to hear from people who in the town who will be affected by the scheme, which will see the Met Line routed from Croxley station, through two new ones in Ascot Road and Vicarage Road before connecting with Watford High Street station, and terminating at Watford Junction.
Comments(55)
gusgreen
says...
10:08am Tue 9 Oct 12
Reg Edit
says...
10:12am Tue 9 Oct 12
The Rover wrote:I don't live on the Cassiobury and I will miss Watford Met if it goes. It's not a private station, it's open to all residents of Watford and is used by residents from outside the Cassiobury quite extensively.
Putting aside the concerns of a handful of Cassiobury residents this can only be good for Watford as a whole.
It's unfair to label this as a Cassiobury issue.
The Rover
says...
10:41am Tue 9 Oct 12
Reg Edit wrote:Reg, you will have a choice of 4 Met stations in Watford rather than one. Surely that can only be a good thing for all residents & businesses in Watford
The Rover wrote:I don't live on the Cassiobury and I will miss Watford Met if it goes. It's not a private station, it's open to all residents of Watford and is used by residents from outside the Cassiobury quite extensively.
Putting aside the concerns of a handful of Cassiobury residents this can only be good for Watford as a whole.
It's unfair to label this as a Cassiobury issue.
TRT
says...
10:44am Tue 9 Oct 12
So the whole project is balanced on a knife-edge anyway? What about the "massive" economic benefits? Surely those outweigh a two year trial of split-service? And the argument about West Watford having low car ownership can be turned on its head - if the area around the existing Met has one of the highest proportions of car ownership, then closing the station there can only force the people who own cars into using them.
The Rover
says...
10:47am Tue 9 Oct 12
Where did they get the figure that 80% of West Watford residents do not have access to a car! I would put that figure at maybe 8% if that.
TRT
says...
10:50am Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
11:00am Tue 9 Oct 12
"Elected Mayor Dorothy Thornhill said the new arrangement would allow the council to use the car parks as a tool to attract people to the town."
I'm not absolutely convinced of the mayor's commitment to rail replacing car use...
TRT
says...
11:04am Tue 9 Oct 12
mrn_wfc
says...
11:15am Tue 9 Oct 12
Its time to Start building and re-generate Watford. Losing Watford Met line is no big loss as you reap the benefits of 3 new stations and linked to Watford Junction.
TRT
says...
11:18am Tue 9 Oct 12
That land will not be used for a station, and will not be adjacent to any new station. The nearest station will be either Vicarage Road or Ascot Road. The area needs jobs, but it will see housing.
TRT
says...
11:51am Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
12:15pm Tue 9 Oct 12
For those who say that the college is closer to the Junction than the Met, I agree. But the fare is £5 a day more.
TRT
says...
12:29pm Tue 9 Oct 12
I hope your traffic studies include the impact of an extra 302 pedestrian crossings of Whippendell Road and Rickmansworth Road during the rush hour.
Reg Edit
says...
12:34pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT wrote:I'm far from convinced she lives in the real world.
I've just read the Charter Place news story.
"Elected Mayor Dorothy Thornhill said the new arrangement would allow the council to use the car parks as a tool to attract people to the town."
I'm not absolutely convinced of the mayor's commitment to rail replacing car use...
Sanity 750
says...
12:50pm Tue 9 Oct 12
dontknowynot
says...
12:55pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Watfordengineer
says...
12:59pm Tue 9 Oct 12
My understanding is that the frequency of the trains will increase which will mean for those who walk longer will have a shorter wait for a train!
Nigel Spate
says...
1:41pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Enough talking time move and build the link . There have been many mistakes with the railways west of Watford for over 100 years; this project makes sense and integrates 2 lines that that should have been joined up years ago
Watfordengineer
says...
2:23pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
2:29pm Tue 9 Oct 12
How sure can we be that the inflation and passenger growth figures have been correctly interpreted and assessed in the funding bid? Have the figures been independently verified?
TRT
says...
2:40pm Tue 9 Oct 12
I refer Mr Hunter to Justine Greening's use of the word just prior to finding out that they got the sums wrong and it was about as robust as a soufflé.
Nigel Spate
says...
2:44pm Tue 9 Oct 12
JohnnyHornet
says...
3:23pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
3:30pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Not in my back yard?
More a case of "Actually, we want it in our back yard."
Calling people names, especially names with negative connotations, is not warranted.
cameluk
says...
3:35pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
3:46pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Or do you risk it and head for Watford Junction to shave 25 minutes off your journey on a London Midland?
Or maybe you time it right and change at Bushey instead, saving 20 minutes.
In other words, will Watford Junction be brought into the TfL zoning system as a result of this project?
TRT
says...
3:52pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
4:10pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
4:19pm Tue 9 Oct 12
The Rover
says...
4:27pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Are there plans to have a fast train from Watford Junction, stopping at Moor Park, Harrow and Baker Street only?
TRT
says...
4:33pm Tue 9 Oct 12
The Rover
says...
4:58pm Tue 9 Oct 12
JohnnyHornet wrote:or is it Michael Fish the weatherman
Is this the same Michael Fish that was the Metropolitan Line General Manager in the 70's, this line should have been built years ago, surely anything that potentially removes cars from the A 412 from Croxley to Watford must be a good thing, Oh I forgot Nimbys etc.
TimberJim
says...
5:20pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT wrote:It seems to me that the main objection for Watford Met closing is the distance 2,500 people a working week will have to walk. All the evidence presented by TRT an others just seems to be a bit of extra flab to back up their main argument of having to walk a bit further to catch the train every morning. I can see that argument as possibly being valid but then drawing so many extra people into the catchment area of the railway seems a better argument IMHO.
Entry and exits at Watford Met (1.48 million) are roughly the same as at Chalfont & Latimer (1.1), more than at Chorleywood (0.85), less than Amersham (2.11) and Rickmansworth (1.91), but ALL of those other passenger numbers are shared with Chiltern, are they not? Chesham, 3.5km away from Amersham, only has 0.46 million, yet they not only retained their shuttle, but had their service improved by dint of a direct 2tph service!
To flip the argument, does it seem fair to change a major part of the scheme for such a small number of people to benefit?
pr76uk
says...
5:59pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT
says...
6:31pm Tue 9 Oct 12
As for Rickmansworth... I don't use the station, so I was unaware of the off-peak only service from Chiltern. How would Rickmansworth users feel about a Ricky to Watford Junction service utilising the North Curve?
Nigel Spate
says...
8:03pm Tue 9 Oct 12
Watford Met - Watford Jct 1,3 miles - 26 min walk I accept that this is not an easy walk having done this walk myself. I wish I lived within a 13min walk of the station!
John Howard Norfolk
says...
8:45pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TimberJim
says...
9:09pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TRT wrote:So if I understand your argument correctly, when the Met station closes suddenly a whole load of people hop into their cars to drive to the new station at Ascot Road? Really? Can't they just walk to the new station? If you use Watford Met to get into London, your still going to go that way. If you use it to get to Rickmansowrth then you might want to drive I suppose. I still think the number of people who will suddenly have access to a decent train line will be more of a benefit that the few people who may take to their cars...
I think you misunderstand. If the 2,500 people a week converted all or part of their train journey to a car journey (evidence suggests that they are much more likely to have a car or be able to afford a car to use), then the traffic reduction promised will be an increase.
As for Rickmansworth... I don't use the station, so I was unaware of the off-peak only service from Chiltern. How would Rickmansworth users feel about a Ricky to Watford Junction service utilising the North Curve?
Nigel Spate
says...
9:56pm Tue 9 Oct 12
TimberJim wrote:These 2500 people who live near the station - I wonder how many of then regularly use the train? This vociferous small group of people are more likely more worried about a drop in the value of their houses when they no longer live very near an open station. Their arguments are weak, flawed and they are disproportional distraction from all the people which will benefit from this link.
TRT wrote:So if I understand your argument correctly, when the Met station closes suddenly a whole load of people hop into their cars to drive to the new station at Ascot Road? Really? Can't they just walk to the new station? If you use Watford Met to get into London, your still going to go that way. If you use it to get to Rickmansowrth then you might want to drive I suppose. I still think the number of people who will suddenly have access to a decent train line will be more of a benefit that the few people who may take to their cars...
I think you misunderstand. If the 2,500 people a week converted all or part of their train journey to a car journey (evidence suggests that they are much more likely to have a car or be able to afford a car to use), then the traffic reduction promised will be an increase.
As for Rickmansworth... I don't use the station, so I was unaware of the off-peak only service from Chiltern. How would Rickmansworth users feel about a Ricky to Watford Junction service utilising the North Curve?
TRT
says...
10:06am Wed 10 Oct 12
To keep the Met open and leave all else as is would cost around £20million. That's £16m for two new S8 trains to fill in the gaps caused by the longer branch, plus another £4m for infrastructure which would have been relocated (ticket barriers, ticket machines, vending machines, POS equipment, PSA equipment etc).
Alternatively, if they went for 3tph to the junction and 3tph to the Met, at a cost of £4m for the duplicated equipment then they would have to run a timetabled service to the new stations rather than a turn-up-and-go service. I actually don't think a timetabled service would be as bad as Mr Foley suggests. They have one at Chesham, Amersham, and other stations on that branch; Watford Junction Overground runs to a timetable.
I think it's in the people's interest to retain as many transport access points as possible.
Nigel Spate
says...
10:25am Wed 10 Oct 12
TRT
says...
10:32am Wed 10 Oct 12
TRT
says...
12:02pm Wed 10 Oct 12
http://www.google.co
m/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&
esrc=s&source=web&cd
=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCIQ
FjAA&url=http%3A%2F%
2Fwww.croxleyraillin
k.com%2Fdownloads%2F
app11%2FAPP31%2520-%
2520Watford%2520Metr
opolitan%2520Line%25
20Station%2520Survey
s%2520-Technical%252
0Report%2520Sept%252
02010.pdf&ei=a1V1UPT
gOMfZ0QWwg4DADw&usg=
AFQjCNG93Z_wN6OE-H1q
Zd4JJqEuVa6MMQ&sig2=
B7X1Y20M2Fmr5ni28eNk
rw
Erk. The WO will screw this link up. I searched Google for "watford met entry exit by time of day"
Nigel Spate
says...
1:05pm Wed 10 Oct 12
samwatford
says...
1:54am Fri 12 Oct 12
Nigel Spate
says...
8:52am Fri 12 Oct 12
samwatford wrote:You comment is spot on, Maybe one of should take a trip down to Watford Met next week and take some photographs of the crowds of all local residents queuing to get on and off the the platforms!
I travelled to Watford met from london last weekend. I could not believe my eyes when only 5 people were there in the whole train including myself who got out at Watford met. What a waste of LUL/TFL resources. I have always seen much more minimum around 50- 100 people in the Overground service at Watford Junction from London. Only other time I have used the met line in the past is when they close Overground service for weekend engineering works. If they build this link I think not only watford but the whole region will gain as it will become much easier to travel to harrow & wembley on the met line, heathrow airport, uxbridge and other stations on the piccadily line, south london using the jubilee line from watford junction.
TRT
says...
9:46am Fri 12 Oct 12
I've been informed that shuttle services are not popular, but by turning an 8 car train into two 4 cars (or more realistically by buying four carriages with driving cabs, turning one 8 car into three 4 cars...), you could answer the issue of service frequency at a lower capital cost.
Nigel Spate
says...
10:47am Fri 12 Oct 12
John Howard Norfolk
says...
10:22am Sat 13 Oct 12
Nigel Spate wrote:Yes.......the greater good for the community is the large number of West Watford residents who will gain a nearby train service as opposed to the smaller number of Cassiobury car owners whose occasional train journeys will require a walk.
Is it me or are the 2500 people who live near the current Met station dominating this debate?. The benefits for rest of the community of the Croxley Link far out way the mild inconvenience to these people. This is not exactly a hardship as according to Google Maps Watford Met - Ascot Road 0.7 miles-13min walk
Watford Met - Watford Jct 1,3 miles - 26 min walk I accept that this is not an easy walk having done this walk myself. I wish I lived within a 13min walk of the station!
mr_jrt
says...
11:13am Wed 17 Oct 12
tely having 5 or so near-identical Croxley Link articles is fragmenting the discussion :(
...does anyone know if there is a way of submitting views if you cannot attend in person? I really feel they need to consider the impact the new link road will have on the project as there is still time to revise things before anything has been built.
A pair of stations, the first on the junction of Cardiff Road and the new link road and the second on Tolpits Lane would be far more useful than just the planned one on Vicarage Road.
TRT
says...
11:31am Wed 17 Oct 12
I agree with you about the Cardiff Road station and the reopening of West Watford. West Watford is supposed to house a new sub-station for boosting the traction supply along that section. The old Stadium Halt is actually closer to a major electric substation, so the cabling would presumably be slightly cheaper. The hospital and football ground would benefit greatly from a Cardiff Road stop. This would, however, increase the travel time on that line and put increased pressure on them to either reduce frequency or buy an extra train. They could, of course, always reduce their S8 service to Chesham and reinstate a shorter but more frequent 'S4' shuttle on that branch - I'm sure they don't need to move all those empty seats around after all.
Nigel Spate
says...
11:35am Wed 17 Oct 12
On what basis to rest this assertion? I still wonder when the all the talk will stop and the construction start. Lets hope they don't find a new species of newt in the River Colne near the proposed link!
mr_jrt
says...
3:17pm Wed 17 Oct 12
Tolpits lane (aka. Watford West), serves both a large residential area in all directions as well as Westfield College. It was originally opened for a reason, after all.
Vicarage Road on the other hand is on the periphery of West Watford, and to the south and east has large amount of open green space in its catchment area. If you wanted to serve the new health campus and stadium properly, then you may as well stick a station equidistant between Watford West and Watford High Street...which conveniently, is roughly where the new link road comes onto the campus. The new build nature of the site gives an opportunity for a decent bus station and bus-rail interchange to be put in place, even if it's just the provision of amply-sized lay-bys for buses.
...It's also perfectly sited for an interchange station, should a future proposal crop up to reinstate the southern curve.
I.e. http://goo.gl/maps/X
iauK
TRT
says...
3:26pm Wed 17 Oct 12
Ah. I see the problem. The new link road is to be for the hospital only. No football ground access, no access to Vicarage Road etc. There are plans given on the Health Campus website.
I agree with you absolutely about the interchange, south curve and buses. Another point about the Health Campus is that National Cycle Route 6 which runs along the Ebury Way departs from the old railbed at Riverside Road Recreation Ground and runs through a playground, along the south side of the river, ends, crosses a pedestrian crossing and then carries on along the north bank of the river and/or along the new link road. The cycle access for the Health Campus from NCR 6 will be infuriating! You'll get within 60 feet of the edge of the campus before you have to divert and do a dog leg rather than make use of the old rail bridge over the Colne tributary, which will bring you in level with I believe it's building 4, a research block, which has a cycle park there! If it was a cycle/bus/rail interchange as well as serving the Health Campus, it would be so much added value.
The Rover says...
9:49am Tue 9 Oct 12