Police stop 200 vehicles in one day (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Police officers stop 200 vehicles in crackdown in Three Rivers
2:25pm Friday 12th October 2012 in News
By Ben Endley, Senior reporter
Police stop 200 vehicles in one day
More than 200 vehicles were stopped in and around Three Rivers in a single day as part of a major crackdown on drivers breaking the law.
Lorries, vans, cars and taxis were stopped as part of the joint operation which involved officers from Hertfordshire Constabulary, Thames Valley Police and the Metropolitan Police.
Officers stationed in Northwood, South Oxhey, Abbots Langley and on major roads used numberplate reading ANPR cameras to identify vehicles believed to be stolen, involved in crime or without the correct documents.
Action was taken against 27 drivers for offences ranging from possession of cannabis to driving without insurance and being involved in the theft of wooden pallets.
Neighbourhood PC Christian Gottman led the operation and said: "Three Rivers has low crime levels and this year has seen even further reductions, however we are aware that criminals travel from other areas into Three Rivers to commit crime and seek to deter them by providing a visible presence near those borders."
Comments(9)
TRT
says...
3:11pm Fri 12 Oct 12
Hornets number 12 fan
says...
10:45am Sat 13 Oct 12
garston tony
says...
9:35am Mon 15 Oct 12
From TRT's post it seems that they would have had valid reasons to stop all the vehicles they did but many of those stops would have been due to paper work issues and not actual crimes. To take action against 27 people when you've only stopped 200 vehicles is a great ratio in my mind, if you think this is lazy hornet no 12 please answer the question how else would these 27 drivers have been caught if it wasn’t in an operation like this?
Why is it that people are up in arms whenever motorists are caught doing wrong. People get a speeding tickets, it’s the polices fault and not theirs for breaking the law. Get a parking ticket, it’s the traffic wardens fault and not theirs for parking where they shouldn’t. Get stopped for not having insurance/for having illegal drugs on you/for having stolen goods, it’s the polices fault for catching them.
Hows about people stop being lazy, and stop blaming everyone else for their own actions and for things they are responsible for that are wrong?
LSC
says...
1:11pm Mon 15 Oct 12
I'd back an experienced copper's instinct over technology every time (and that's an engineer talking!).
When I was 17 in the 80s, I used to get stopped all the time when I was allowed to borrow my Dads car (This was neccesary as my own cars frequently fell apart) . Although everything was legal about myself and the car, the police would explain it 'just didn't look right'. Sure, it was a pain at times and I was never prosecuted for anything, but if I had just stolen it and the owner hadn't reported it yet, an ANPR would not pick it up. But a good copper would.
garston tony
says...
2:31pm Tue 16 Oct 12
What the camera and technology does is enables coppers to be able to target specific vehicles that are recorded as having specific issues i.e. known not to have tax or/and insurance, known to have incomplete or faulty paperwork and so on. It does look like the majority of those stopped were for more minor paperwork issues but it doesn’t take a genius to see that someone that drives without tax or insurance (which is bad enough in itself and needs tackling and well done to them for doing so) is more likely to be involved in other criminal acts such carrying illegal drugs or handling stolen property.
In your first post you cried out at 173 innocent people being stopped, well I think that’s been put to bed and that all those stopped were stopped for valid reasons. However using a coppers instinct (as would have beeen the case pre anpr cameras) to stop 200 vehicles you'd probably find that the majority of those stopped would actually be totally innocent of any infraction whats so ever.
Personally I see it as our civic duty to assist the police when asked to and in my many years I've been stopped by them a handful of times when they've wanted to check paperwork or were looking for specific individuals following an incident in the locality etc. I've never ever had a problem with that and don’t have a problem with them stopping vehicles with actual known issues. The only people that should be concerned are those doing something wrong, simple, and these camera's increase the chances of those in the wrong getting caught and innocent people not being stopped.
garston tony
says...
2:34pm Tue 16 Oct 12
LSC
says...
4:41pm Tue 16 Oct 12
garston tony wrote:I 100% agree. I don't want to not use technology, I am just a little wary of reliance on it.
I would add that i'm sure that the police dont just stop people when prompted to by the anpr and will still use their judgment to stop vehicles that look suspicious to them. Technology and instincts can work together without any issues
Speed cameras changed traffic policing dramatically. There used to be a lot more coppers around patrolling, or sitting on those little mounds off the hard shoulder on the motorway. Not wonderfully cost effective, but some things in life just aren't, and never will be (like the NHS).
But they put in cameras and cut the patrols. That's ok for catching speeders, but no good for all the other dangerous stuff you and I witness every day.
I fear ANPR cameras might go further down this route.
garston tony
says...
12:02pm Wed 17 Oct 12
Technology just narrows the odds in the polices favour, as in the above being able to stop over 200 vehicles each of which had a known issue, or by taking on duties that free up their time for other matters such as speed camera's.
LSC says...
3:01pm Fri 12 Oct 12
Doesn't sound like a crackdown to me, sounds like 173 people were incorrectly suspected of criminal activety and had their time wasted without good reason.
This reliance on ANPR cameras is worrying.