Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
3:40pm Friday 5th June 2009 in
Watford chairman Jimmy Russo has questioned what changed in the 48 hours between Brendan Rodgers declaring he was ‘100 per cent’ commited to the Hornets and his previous manager expressing his desire to talk to Reading.
Rodgers became Reading manager yesterday, although the Royals had yet to confirm this before the Watford Observer went to press.
Just last week Russo was adamant Rodgers would be staying at Vicarage Road after speaking with his manager but on Friday the 36-year-old said he was keen to speak to his former club.
Watford granted Rodgers permission to speak to the Royals on Tuesday but Russo says he already knew by then that Rodgers would be leaving the club.
Russo said: “It incredibly disappointed me because I thought I had a good quality conversation with him on the Tuesday and he was very dismissive with anything to do with Reading.
“Obviously in 48 hours something changed and he expressed a desire to talk to Reading.
“With the best will in the world I really want people to come and be happy to be at Watford and fight the Watford cause. If somebody comes to the club and stays a few months and starts having hesitations he’s probably not, in the long-term, the right person for the club.”
He added: “I don’t want to discredit him but I want people to know the facts. I will let people draw their own conclusions that this guy [Rodgers] went there [Watford], was given a chance and seven months later he wants to leave.
“I had no intention of moving Brendan Rogers on so the club could get compensation because we saw him as the future. So something obviously happened in the 48 hours between last Tuesday and Thursday.”
In the end Russo and chief exceutive Julian Winter agreed a compensation package which will land the club an initial fee of more than £500,000, which could eventually rise to around £1m if Reading achieve promotion back to the Premier League.
Although it has not been announced yet, assistant manager Dean Austin, football consultant Frank Lampard Snr and football physiologist Karl Halabi will be joining the Royals in the near future.
Watford refused to comment on Reading’s approach for Rodgers until they announced his departure, which was criticised by fans who stated the club’s promises to be open and honest.
But Russo said: “We took the decision as a board and Graham Taylor advised on this one, that we shouldn’t go public [about the approach]. The reason for this was two fold.
“One because I felt that if we made a statement in the public arena that it would weaken our negotiations with Reading, in that if we had agreed and went public then we would have accepted the situation of life without Brendan.
“On the other hand I had to be very careful because if the whole Brendan moving to Reading broke down then I would have fans turning on Brendan because he had an interview with Reading. Part of me was protecting Brendan. I had to protect Brendan.
“In the end the information was slow coming through but I think the way Julian and I handled ourselves was right because of the compensation and protecting him from a backlash from fans had it gone wrong.
“I can actually confirm that it only went through at midday today [Thursday] so as soon as I could give them information I did.”
Russo told Rodgers about Reading’s approach on Friday.
When asked about what Rodgers said to him, he said: “The quality of conversation was that I had already been approached by his [Rodgers] representatives and the people from Reading had approached me to have a conversation with him and he said he would like to have that opportunity to speak to them.
“So, as per his contract, he could have left the club by paying what Watford regarded a poor compensation package and walked out of the football club and we would have had no manager and a low fee.
“When somebody doesn’t want to work for someone, there is not much you can say to anybody in any sort of employment, so he was in a strong position and could have walked out for that fee, which would have given us even bigger problems.
“So I am really pleased with the deal we have financially, we just need to be positive and move forward.”
Russo said he did not want to discredit Rodgers and praised Reading for the way they handled negotiations.
He said: “I am very happy with how [Reading director of football] Nick Hammond has conducted himself throughout these transaction. I am pleased with the way they went about doing things. It doesn’t affect our relationship with Reading except for that I want to go there and beat them good and proper next year.”
He added: “The way Sir John Madejski and his team have conducted themselves has been of the highest order.
“In all fairness to Brendan, I think he has had an affiliation with Reading as a young lad working on the coaching staff and I understand his father-in-law used to play for Reading, he is local to Reading itself.
“Maybe he had a feeling that Reading is a bigger club than Watford with a Premiership set up. My gut feeling is that it is a Premiership set-up but not a Premiership club and I did say to him at the time that it would be a wrong career move and would be going sideways and not going forward.
“I did as much convincing as I could but once I realised that he wanted to go that it was a lost cause.”
Comments(46)
JonBoy
says...
4:14pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Only 2 Ross Jenkins
says...
4:30pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Only 2 Ross Jenkins
says...
4:30pm Fri 5 Jun 09
enlightened one
says...
4:37pm Fri 5 Jun 09
llloydwithathirdl
says...
4:39pm Fri 5 Jun 09
a1derek
says...
4:48pm Fri 5 Jun 09
duckfan10
says...
4:48pm Fri 5 Jun 09
cliff46
says...
4:50pm Fri 5 Jun 09
mellow yellow
says...
5:03pm Fri 5 Jun 09
worthing_hornet
says...
5:07pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Berks Horn
says...
5:11pm Fri 5 Jun 09
HOOF
says...
5:19pm Fri 5 Jun 09
mellow yellow
says...
5:24pm Fri 5 Jun 09
JamesA
says...
5:30pm Fri 5 Jun 09
cliff46
says...
5:37pm Fri 5 Jun 09
cliff46
says...
5:42pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Benson13
says...
6:04pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Rookery Veteren
says...
6:04pm Fri 5 Jun 09
MARBLE66
says...
6:05pm Fri 5 Jun 09
tommy gunn
says...
6:12pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Kenfurphy
says...
6:42pm Fri 5 Jun 09
herts hornet
says...
7:04pm Fri 5 Jun 09
garyporter1
says...
7:05pm Fri 5 Jun 09
Prof Plum
says...
7:36pm Fri 5 Jun 09
There was only one Scully
says...
10:20pm Fri 5 Jun 09
tonyevans22
says...
2:54am Sat 6 Jun 09
stevemag
says...
8:52am Sat 6 Jun 09
TonyCoton
says...
9:07am Sat 6 Jun 09
Prof Plum wrote:Don't make me laugh! The Russo's were kicked off the board because they wanted AB out earlier. Thay were right to want to. Just how many jobs in the Championship has he applied for and not got? He is a bad apple.
Thank goodness for the Russos. If only Simpson had had the good sense not to get rid of the loyal and dedicated Aidy and replace him this treacherous turncoat we wouldn't be in this mess. Bring back Boothroyd
tonyevans22
says...
1:21pm Sat 6 Jun 09
MJ1
says...
2:49pm Sat 6 Jun 09
Hans
says...
2:55pm Sat 6 Jun 09
Hans
says...
3:15pm Sat 6 Jun 09
herts hornet
says...
4:33pm Sat 6 Jun 09
tonyevans22 wrote:tonyevans22
Steve..This the mail on line,the samw mail that has quoted Newcastles wage bill is £1.1mill a week with youth and reserve team players on 20k plus a week.The Russo's have not come out and said that he had a release clause have they,why would someone have a release clause when its their 1st managerial job,this does not make sense. If their was one,then I see this board employing other managers with the same to gain extra money when he does well.If this is the way foward then we might as well have smith prisken,Mcanuff all on the same contracts to max incoming finances. Did Reading ring watford and say we want to Talk to BR? and then the Russ's slip in,you can if you offer us above the release clause on his contract? Think about it.
IN THE PRESIDENTS CLUB
says...
6:00pm Sat 6 Jun 09
tonyevans22
says...
7:26pm Sat 6 Jun 09
herts hornet wrote:Hang on a minute the clause was 350K according to the mail,now its 500k according to your post,I blame the board for putting in such a clause,If what they say is true that they only want people with wfc at heart then that clause in his contract would never have been put in,and alarm bells would have starting ringing that he was never here for the long term,and this was a stepping stone which was Ok by the board with such a clause.BR had every right to exploit that clause which was down to the Russo's..If Nigel gibbs becomes are manager with such a claus be written again? If so then he is not right for the club,and its a ploy for the Russo's to make money.Why can you not see that?
tonyevans22 wrote:tonyevans22
Steve..This the mail on line,the samw mail that has quoted Newcastles wage bill is £1.1mill a week with youth and reserve team players on 20k plus a week.The Russo's have not come out and said that he had a release clause have they,why would someone have a release clause when its their 1st managerial job,this does not make sense. If their was one,then I see this board employing other managers with the same to gain extra money when he does well.If this is the way foward then we might as well have smith prisken,Mcanuff all on the same contracts to max incoming finances. Did Reading ring watford and say we want to Talk to BR? and then the Russ's slip in,you can if you offer us above the release clause on his contract? Think about it.
please do your homework BR was free to talk to any club that offered the 500k release clause in his 12 month rolling contract ,Jimmy dug his heels in and somehow got another 350k if Reading get promoted money they did not have to give but did not want an even more ugly showdown with watford this is FACT ,Jimmy or the present board are NOT responsable for this judas going THEY WANTED HIM TO STAY they were powerless to prevent this BUT lessons must be learn't and these sort of release clauses should not be in contracts unless maybe at a much higher figure ,GET behingd the board and vent your fury at BR at the vic later this season !!
Billie
says...
12:48am Sun 7 Jun 09
mellow yellow
says...
6:52am Sun 7 Jun 09
WMH
says...
10:08am Sun 7 Jun 09
Hans wrote:I am with you 100% Hans.
I think there is a strong case for making Reading our enemy number one. Luton are saints in comparison. And I mean that seriously. In less than a year we have had the phantom goal incident and now this with Rodgers. Geographically Reading isn't that far either. So here I am, to launch a campaign that Reading is officially our sworn enemy. We only 'hate' Luton because of geographical reasons. We have real reason to hate Reading. Next season when we play the Royals let's make sure we lay into Rodgers for 90 minutes non-stop.
grahamwfc
says...
12:55pm Sun 7 Jun 09
IN THE PRESIDENTS CLUB
says...
1:39pm Sun 7 Jun 09
tonyevans22
says...
3:18pm Sun 7 Jun 09
mellow yellow
says...
8:18pm Sun 7 Jun 09
cliff46
says...
8:40pm Sun 7 Jun 09
tonyevans22
says...
10:03pm Sun 7 Jun 09
lutondown
says...
6:52pm Mon 8 Jun 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in Watford and all around Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in Watford and find friendship
Search Now »
Find properties in Watford and Hertfordshire
Search Now »
Find cars for sale in Watford and Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Johnjones1959 says...
3:57pm Fri 5 Jun 09