Duxbury: 'Players won't be sold to pay bills' (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Watford chief executive claims players won't be sold to fund operating loses
3:10pm Friday 20th July 2012 in Sport
Picture: Holly Cant
Watford players will no longer be sold to fund operating loses, according to the club’s chief executive Scott Duxbury.
The Hornets have made no secret of the fact they needed to sell players to balance the books in recent years and there are noticeable departures every summer.
This year has been no different, with vice captain Adrian Mariappa and goalkeeper Scott Loach leaving the club.
But speaking last week, before the duo departed, Duxbury claimed Watford do not have to sell and the money raised will be reinvested back into the playing squad.
He said: “We don’t have to sell players but our philosophy, which is the philosophy at Udinese and it is my personal philosophy, is that we should never be scared of selling players when they are at the top of their value, as long as that money is going back into the playing squad.
“Some of the most successful clubs in the world are selling clubs – Manchester United sold Jaap Stam. The question should be not who are you selling but who are you bringing in.
“Our philosophy will be not to just hold on to players because we don’t have to sell, which we don’t financially because we are fine, but if the player is at top value and we have identified through our scouting network a better and younger player, then of course we will sell.
“But the key is that the money won’t be to fund operating losses, it will be to reinvest into the playing squad and make it better. But there is no pressure to sell to fund trading losses.
“The whole ambition and philosophy of the club has now changed.”
Watford had a number of outstanding debts after former owner Laurence Bassini stopped paying bills once it became clear he would be leaving the club.
When asked how much debt the club had, Duxbury replied: “I can’t go into specifics but the reason the Pozzos are here is to make sure the club is stable. They are aware of the debt situation and we are working through it.
“As of the date of completion, the club is completely stable and has no financial problems because of the Pozzos.
“I can’t go into the specifics of the level of debt but we are being supported by the Pozzos through a new business plan and through the team achieving success, we will increase the revenues and we will move towards being self-sufficient. But in the meantime, we will have the support of the Pozzos,” the chief executive added.
Comments(15)
desk35
says...
3:23pm Fri 20 Jul 12
wow
mattymashup
says...
4:05pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Ronny oh Ronny Ronny
says...
4:48pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Colin West's mullet wrote:Hahaha brilliant, beat me to it!
yes yes yes, but what was in the safe Ducky?
So we will sell players at their top value and replace them with a better, younger player????
Mapps - Hall
Loach - Almunia?!
Not really practicing what they preach at the moment.
Don't get me wrong, this is the best news that we have had in our history I would say, so hopefully it's just a bit of transition for now to get a balanced, decent squad who can compete and hopefully achieve promotion first!.... I hope!!!!!
Back from Hammerau
says...
4:55pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Football League Financial Play rules are coming into effect this season which limit the losses clubs are allowed to make and the amounts owners can plough in.
andyhooked
says...
5:13pm Fri 20 Jul 12
stevyweavy
says...
5:15pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Back from Hammerau wrote:These rules are rubbish - if you want to get round it simply create and issue more shares in the company to yourself so as to be able to put more cash in.
If we don't sell players to fund operating losses, how will we plug the financial gap?
Football League Financial Play rules are coming into effect this season which limit the losses clubs are allowed to make and the amounts owners can plough in.
Bringe
says...
5:16pm Fri 20 Jul 12
QUINNPT
says...
10:51pm Fri 20 Jul 12
We can have a loss off c£4m this year then c£2m next season.
Mapps wanted to play in the Prem which you can't deny him of that opportunity. We can't guarantee him prem football yet.
As for Loach unfortunately he had lost his confidence, though I do agree £200k does seem a bit cheep.
We don't know that Loach's Agent may have been sniffing around for him and an opportunity came up.
What ever you may have thought of the previous owner , the club would have stated the value of each player as part of the Due-Diligence that would have been carried out by the Pozzo's.
Though I agree the comments do contradict themselves. Howerver, the proof will be the players we bring in which the money that we got will be used for signing on fees and to cover increase in salaries irrespective if they are loans or free transfers.
Roger "Studs" Joslyn
says...
8:47am Sat 21 Jul 12
holtonian
says...
10:09am Sat 21 Jul 12
southernhornet
says...
12:16pm Sat 21 Jul 12
In Pozzo I trust .
CreteJoe
says...
1:29pm Sat 21 Jul 12
southernhornet wrote:Would you buy a used car from Duxbury?
This wouldn't be the Duxberry spin beginning to emerge from Vicarage Road, we were warned, we were well and truly warned!
In Pozzo I trust .
corbindallas
says...
2:13pm Sat 21 Jul 12
CreteJoe wrote:No, would you?
southernhornet wrote:Would you buy a used car from Duxbury?
This wouldn't be the Duxberry spin beginning to emerge from Vicarage Road, we were warned, we were well and truly warned!
In Pozzo I trust .
Bringe
says...
12:09am Sun 22 Jul 12
I'd buy a used car from him so long as it's not a Baz Bentley special.
Colin West's mullet says...
3:21pm Fri 20 Jul 12