Watford Academy to be audited next month ahead of Premier League's EPPP changes

Picture: Alan Cozzi/Watford FC Picture: Alan Cozzi/Watford FC

Watford's Academy will be inspected next month ahead of the Premier League's Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) coming into force in the summer.

The controversial EPPP will result in a radical overhaul of the academy structure in the Premier League and Football League, as the current two-tier system will see clubs rated from one to four.

The higher the club's rating - with one being the elite - the more funding they will receive and the more options available to them.

Peterborough director of football Barry Fry accused the Premier League of blackmailing Football League clubs into accepting the proposals when the vote was held back in October, as they apparently threatened to withhold £5m of funding for lower league clubs if the motion wasn't passed.

Watford's Harefield Academy is considered one of the leading academies, if not the best, in the country but the Hornets are unsure which rating they will aim for and subsequently be given.

When asked for an update last week, Watford's head of academy Nick Cox told the Watford Observer: "They are still knocking the rules backwards and forwards as we speak. We know the Academy is going to have to open its doors to be audited in mid-April. An independent organisation will audit academies up and down the country and that could be an 18-month process to get every single club in the country audited.

"But as we speak, the rules that are supposed to come into play on July 1 are still being revised so until we know exactly what those rules are, it makes it very difficult for us to make a definitive decision on where we will look to pitch ourselves as an academy."

He continued: "I think it [the auditing] will be a rolling process. I am pretty confident that everything will be up and running for the new season as the governing bodies would like. The Football League and the FA are working together on this and all the noises suggest we will be up and running next season."

The Premier League's website says the EPPP aims to: · Increase the number and quality of home grown players gaining professional contracts in the clubs and playing first-team football at the highest level · Create more time for players to play and be coached · Improve coaching provision · Implement a system of effective measurement and quality assurance · Positively influence strategic investment into the academy system, demonstrating value for money · Seek to implement significant gains in every aspect of player development And the Premier League claim it will do this by focussing on four main areas; coaching, classification, compensation and education.

But it is the compensation issue which has angered a lot of Football League clubs in particular.

From the summer, it is claimed clubs will pay £3,000-per-year for every 12 months the player has spent at a club between the ages of nine and 11.

This will increase for 12 to 16 year olds depending on the academy’s status - ranging from £12,500 and £40,000.

Another one of the controversial changes is that clubs will no longer only be able to sign players who live within 90 minutes of the club.

Cox attended the vote last October with head of football business Ross Wilson and admitted he was concerned the club's best young players may be "cheery-picked" by the bigger sides.

On the day of the vote, Cox explained: "If you look at Watford, we received a considerable amount of money for Harry Forrester when he went to Aston Villa because an independent tribunal committee came to a decision to what they thought we deserved for losing Harry.

"In that equation they would consider his ability, the impact he would have on Watford’s first team, the fact he was an international footballer and all of those sorts of things that were specific to Harry as an individual.

"The proposal that we voted on will actually see all clubs adopt a ‘formulaic approach’ to compensation. There will be a clear, transparent tariff for players, so you will receive X amount of money for every year the boy has been with you.

"It could result in a massive reduction in the amount that smaller clubs will receive if a big club comes and takes a player from you."

A number of Watford's second-year scholars already have professional contracts, including Sean Murray, Tommie Hoban, Jack Bonham and first-year scholar Bernard Mensah.

But Cox said: "Some in the second-year group already have their decision but there are some decisions outstanding and they will be made over the coming weeks before the end of this season.

"All the technical staff, the academy staff and first team staff will get their head together to make those decisions.

"With regards to scholarships, we can't get the boys to sign their scholarships until the third week in April but we have made decisions and we will look to make those announcements when we formally can."

Comments(11)

llloydwithathirdl says...
1:39pm Wed 28 Mar 12

Vile. The Premier League should not be allowed to get away with what they are doing.

babyhornet says...
11:30am Thu 29 Mar 12

This is blatant blackmail by the PL. "If you dont say yes, we will withhold your money". Even the wording on the PL website shows that they intend to steal any young prospects they can. Its so annoying because we are one of the best teams at developing young talent and have proved that over the years, but we are going to loose out still.

Sahorn says...
12:36pm Thu 29 Mar 12

But if we are audited as a top tier elite Academy , then we will enjoy the benefits of investment, being able to sign boys outside 90 miles etc.

With Watford Academy's history, past record, coaching set up and educational remit, any auditing will surely put us in the Elite bracket, no matter where the club lies in the league.
If not, this is all a stitch up by the PL of the smaller clubs trying to make ends meet.

not a regular says...
12:48pm Thu 29 Mar 12

Yes this stinks. However let's break it down and just look at some things:

1. We will still offer something that many clubs can not offer - the chance to actually play.
2. We will still offer something else that many clubs can not offer - an education AND increased training times, diet and such.
3. Premier League teams will hoover up talent regardless of whether this happens.
4. Premier League teams will spit out neglected but good-to-go talent on free transfers a la Jonathan Hogg.

Yes, the youngsters we do lose will go for less than we would like, however this applies to only those players that FORCE a move through. Luckily this does not happen to us on a consistent basis.

This is terrible for football as a whole, but for Watford I don't think we're going to see a huge difference. We will always be able to offer kids a chance to not get caught in the swamp that are Premier League Academies.

not a regular says...
12:54pm Thu 29 Mar 12

Sahorn wrote:
But if we are audited as a top tier elite Academy , then we will enjoy the benefits of investment, being able to sign boys outside 90 miles etc.

With Watford Academy's history, past record, coaching set up and educational remit, any auditing will surely put us in the Elite bracket, no matter where the club lies in the league.
If not, this is all a stitch up by the PL of the smaller clubs trying to make ends meet.
Everything you have said is true - except I believe that the top-tier academy status requires £3m/year funding, we only supply (and can afford) £1m.

Sahorn says...
1:50pm Thu 29 Mar 12

Wasn't aware of this.

Criteria should be funding 'per academy player registered' after other criteria are met, and with a minimum size, not just how much money is thrown at an Academy.

As only big clubs can afford £3m p.a. funding, the 'stitch up' comment by the PL to get an unfair advantage is even more valid.

BecauseOfBoxingDay says...
2:20pm Thu 29 Mar 12

It'll make no difference if Watford or any other Football League club are classified as top tier. Prem clubs will still hoover up all the talent albeit for a slightly higher fee (but still much less than they would have to pay today). And even if Watford were classified as top tier they would not be able to sustain the considerable funding required to remain top tier because one of their major funding sources - selling their star players - would be gone because these players would already have been hoovered at the academy stage. What will actually happen is that within 3-5 years all or most of the non-Premier League academies will have shut down (regardless of how they were rated). The other possibility is that the Premier League clubs will take over these academies - in my opinion this could have been the plan all along. It wouldn't surprise me at all if in a few years Harefield was owned and operated by Arsenal or Tottenham.

Sahorn says...
4:16pm Thu 29 Mar 12

BecauseOfBoxingDay wrote:
It'll make no difference if Watford or any other Football League club are classified as top tier. Prem clubs will still hoover up all the talent albeit for a slightly higher fee (but still much less than they would have to pay today). And even if Watford were classified as top tier they would not be able to sustain the considerable funding required to remain top tier because one of their major funding sources - selling their star players - would be gone because these players would already have been hoovered at the academy stage. What will actually happen is that within 3-5 years all or most of the non-Premier League academies will have shut down (regardless of how they were rated). The other possibility is that the Premier League clubs will take over these academies - in my opinion this could have been the plan all along. It wouldn't surprise me at all if in a few years Harefield was owned and operated by Arsenal or Tottenham.
This is a depressing scenario for the future of football in this country.

The big get bigger, the small go out of business.

Or, a bit like supermarkets who hoover up the independants.
Watford could become 'Arsenal Express' or 'Tottenham Local'

Bush Hornet says...
6:15pm Thu 29 Mar 12

If you can't beat them join them. We will need to get promoted next season whilst playing beautiful football on our new pitch.

Goldenboy1960 says...
6:28pm Thu 29 Mar 12

Ok I understand they are going to go for Cat 1. But how can we as a club afford £2.5m and all the facilities that are required. I also understand that even Arsenal are not interested in Cat 1. Most of their players are dumped at 16 and suddeny foreign players arrive for the U/18's. Player development is about good coaching and giving the right advice including encouraging a great work ethic and a desire to be tough mentally and work really hard. Don't need to spend that sort of money to develop players, and the club haven't got it anyway. The club and first team will need that money IF it is available. Sack the FA.

ORBY says...
1:35pm Fri 30 Mar 12

This is once again the PL asking for and getting whatever they want, the reason is simple-MONEY!! But of course the question is whether or not the young players want to go and sit in an academy with no real hope of playing in the first team. Forrester was a prime example, he had his mind swayed by the lure of PL and I think he has ended up playing lower league football, had he have stayed and learnt more,I am sure he would be playing PL football. We have an exemplary record in bringing young talent forward and giving these youngsters a chance of forging a career in football, this I am sure will hold us in good stead. Yes, we are being shafted but there is nothing we or any other football league can do to change this, so we will just have to swallow this bitter pill!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree