- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Observer_Owl
Follow Watford Observer on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Watford Observer
Like us on Facebook
'Red mist came down and Deeney lost control' (From Watford Observer)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting WO to 80360, or email us
Defence lawyer for Watford's Troy Deeney says 'red mist came down and he lost control'
5:20pm Monday 25th June 2012 in Watford FC News
By Mike Wright, Chief Reporter
Action Images
Watford FC striker Troy Deeney has been jailed for ten months for his part in a savage brawl that left three students injured, including one with a broken jaw.
Deeney, the club’s top scorer last season, was caught on CCTV kicking one of the victims in the head after his friend’s birthday celebrations ended in violence in Birmingham town centre in February.
The 23-year-old stood in the dock at Birmingham Crown Court today along with his younger brother Ellis Deeney, 21, and their two friends Oliver Brennan and Marc Williams.
The court heard the four had been "swept up" in a large fight which took place outside Bliss Bar on February 29 between the students and a group of unrelated black youths who were trying to force their way into the club.
The judge was repeatedly played footage of the 30-second mêlée in which Troy and Brennan were seen kicking a student in the head.
Ellis was also filmed aiming a kick at another student and Williams, whose birthday was being celebrated, punched someone else in the crowd. Troy’s defence solicitor Mark Haslam argued that he became involved in the fight because he saw his brother Ellis involved and then the "red mist" descended.
He told the judge that Troy, who has a three year old son, had the most to lose and had put it all in jeopardy in a "moment of madness".
Mr Haslam said: "It is clear that in his 23 years Troy Deeney has done much that’s good for himself, his family and communities for whom he is involved. That is to his credit.
"Against that you have to balance his participation in this disgraceful episode.
"Is it really absolutely necessary for him to lose everything he has achieved and could achieve because of his engagement in those 30 seconds seen so frequently today?"
However the judge, David Tomlinson QC, said the four men had joined in a "gratuitous beating" of the students who were already outnumbered in the fight.
He singled out Troy and Brennan as the more serious offenders for attacking men who were on the ground and defenceless.
He said: "A particularly aggravating feature for a defendant is to kick someone when he is on the ground and a particularly aggravating feature for a defendant to kick someone in the head when that person appears to be barely conscious and quite plainly not capable of defending himself."
Prosecutor David Lees told the court that of the three university students left injured by attack, it was Nathan Parton whose jaw was fractured.
Mr Lees said his injuries had left Parton with a scar, which made it difficult to shave and meant he may need to undergo plastic surgery.
Another student, Liam Baister, had his lip badly lacerated and required 20 stitches and a third student, Peter Hearne, was left with a grazed forehead and swelling to the back of his head.
Troy and Ellis were both arrested on the night of the fight, with Williams and Brennan apprehended in the following weeks.
All four men admitted affray at an earlier court hearing in May based on what they had been captured doing in the CCTV footage.
The Crown Prosecution Service said it could not be proved that any of the four was responsible for the injuries the students sustained.
A judge was told the police were still seeking people in connection with the fight.
The court was told that the Deeneys and their friends were out celebrating the birthday of Williams on the night.
They had been for a meal, before heading to Bliss and were outside when the punch-up started.
Ellis Deeney’s barrister, Lynette McClement, said the birthday group had not been the ones to start the fight.
She said a statement from Bliss Bar’s head doorman had stated the fight had broken out when a group of black youths tried to barge their way into the club.
The doorman said one of the black males then picked up a pole to threaten the club’s staff, which was taken out of his hands by one of the students, starting the brawl.
"The violence was started by others and in the confusion those in the dock were swept up in it," said Ms McClement.
Ms McClement said the Deeney brothers had also been dealing with a tough family situation in the run-up to the fight.
She said their grandfather and grandmother had both died in the preceding year and the week before the incident they had learned their father had been diagnosed with terminal cancer. Their father Paul has subsequently died.
Ms McClement described Ellis as having a "short fuse" on the night of the brawl.
Troy said he had initially wanted to keep out of the fight but entered the fray because he had seen Ellis in the scrapping crowd.
Mr Haslam told the judge: "As far as he is concerned the red mist came down and from that moment he lost control."
When Troy was interviewed by the police he was described as "audibly shocked" by the CCTV footage and remorseful.
Yet Judge Tomlinson said although they did not start the brawl, the participation of the four made it worse for the victims.
"Three men were singled out in what can only be described as a gratuitous beating," said Judge Tomlinson.
"The effect was that three men, who were already heavily outnumbered, became even more so as a result of what you all did."
Brennan, 20, of Hazel Croft, Chelmsley Wood, was sentenced to eight months in a young offenders institution.
Ellis, of Poplar Avenue, Chelmsley Wood, and Williams, 26, of Stonebridge Crescent, Kingshurst, walked free from court as they were handed eight-month prison terms suspended for 18 months with supervision orders.
As Troy and Brennan were taken down, female relatives burst into tears in the public gallery.
Troy, who gave his address as Keepers Gate, in Chelmsley Wood, could be heard urging them not to cry and asking Ellis to look after their mother.
Deeney has one year left on his Watford contract after signing the extension a month after the incident.
He was released by Aston Villa as a youngster and was at non-league side Chelmsley Town before he was spotted by Walsall.
His performances attracted the attention of Watford and after a slow 18 months to his Hornets career, Deeney finished last season as the club's top goalscorer with 12.
Comments(58)
andyhooked
says...
5:43pm Mon 25 Jun 12
LSC
says...
6:00pm Mon 25 Jun 12
I had my jaw broken years ago in an attack in Watford.
My teeth were wired together for over six weeks.
Ever had toothache? Imagine it in every tooth at once, 24 hours a day. Imagine every time you cough, or sneeze, the wires try to pull your teeth out.
You can't yawn.
You can take pain killers, but have to use a pestle and mortar to grind them down because you can only suck them through clenched teeth, as with all food.
You cannot clean the inside of your teeth and the fur build up makes you retch; but of course you cannot retch- in fact being sick could kill you because you will choke. Which is scary, especially as your diet has to change to food you can suck in through your teeth and your stomach isn't used to that.
So if offered six weeks of that torture (and I still feel it now over 20 years on) or the 5 months he will serve for doing it with Playstations and Sky telly, I know who got the better deal.
andyhooked
says...
6:15pm Mon 25 Jun 12
cliff46
says...
6:20pm Mon 25 Jun 12
We rely on our academy to produce talented decent young men on that basis there should be no place for someone who sets such a cowardly example.
mattymashup
says...
6:23pm Mon 25 Jun 12
LSC wrote:What you are saying is totally fair enough. Deeney was a fool and should never have done what he did. Kicking a man on the ground is deplorable and could have killed him. especially coming from a 15 stone footballer. Deeney will get sacked from the club for sure. And although I am a big fan of his he should have got longer.
Let's get this into perspective. 10 months inside (which it won't be) is NOTHING to the pain of a broken jaw.
I had my jaw broken years ago in an attack in Watford.
My teeth were wired together for over six weeks.
Ever had toothache? Imagine it in every tooth at once, 24 hours a day. Imagine every time you cough, or sneeze, the wires try to pull your teeth out.
You can't yawn.
You can take pain killers, but have to use a pestle and mortar to grind them down because you can only suck them through clenched teeth, as with all food.
You cannot clean the inside of your teeth and the fur build up makes you retch; but of course you cannot retch- in fact being sick could kill you because you will choke. Which is scary, especially as your diet has to change to food you can suck in through your teeth and your stomach isn't used to that.
So if offered six weeks of that torture (and I still feel it now over 20 years on) or the 5 months he will serve for doing it with Playstations and Sky telly, I know who got the better deal.
andyhooked
says...
6:27pm Mon 25 Jun 12
LSC
says...
6:43pm Mon 25 Jun 12
I'll wager most less than a minute, no-one over five.
But the victim has that for over a month, plus toothache-level pain at the same time.
Abbots hornet
says...
6:48pm Mon 25 Jun 12
SAHornet
says...
7:18pm Mon 25 Jun 12
LSC wrote:Yeah, ok dsc we get the picture already.
Thanks for the comments. As an experiment, try it at home. Clench your teeth in one position and see how long you last before you need to move them, even a little tiny bit.
I'll wager most less than a minute, no-one over five.
But the victim has that for over a month, plus toothache-level pain at the same time.
lutondown
says...
8:30pm Mon 25 Jun 12
SAHornet wrote:Just trying to work out what DSC stands for
LSC wrote:Yeah, ok dsc we get the picture already.
Thanks for the comments. As an experiment, try it at home. Clench your teeth in one position and see how long you last before you need to move them, even a little tiny bit.
I'll wager most less than a minute, no-one over five.
But the victim has that for over a month, plus toothache-level pain at the same time.
Ive come up with one that's unprintable!
Lol!
Got to admit, having read the full shebang and seeing a man getting beaten while on the ground certainly changes my view. Sadly our decent principles have been eroded along with any other decent aspect of what the Liberal left would sneer and call our vainglorious past.
Mr Hyde over and out
derry pigweed
says...
8:30pm Mon 25 Jun 12
D.unstable
says...
8:43pm Mon 25 Jun 12
player.
Let's hope we can get rid and do not have to pay him whilst taking one for the team in the showers.
Shows a lack of respect to the club in my opinion.
We have all lost loved ones, but no excuse to kick a defenceless lads head like a football, good job he hasn't got a good kick on him, could have killed him!!!
D.unstable
says...
8:43pm Mon 25 Jun 12
player.
Let's hope we can get rid and do not have to pay him whilst taking one for the team in the showers.
Shows a lack of respect to the club in my opinion.
We have all lost loved ones, but no excuse to kick a defenceless lads head like a football, good job he hasn't got a good kick on him, could have killed him!!!
BarryTheHornet
says...
8:46pm Mon 25 Jun 12
StephenKilamanjiro
says...
10:10pm Mon 25 Jun 12
BarryTheHornet
says...
10:20pm Mon 25 Jun 12
StephenKilamanjiro wrote:He put his hand up cos he got caught.
I doubt he will be let go. Double jeopardy for what he will regret for the rest of his life. 10 months inside for a footballer will seem like a lifetime and considered that he would have done his time. I hope the club see sense and stand by the guy. After all, he put his hands up and would of been prepared for the custodial sentence. LSC I feel for you pain after hearing that you had your jaw broken and please don't think that my opinion is taking anything from that. I just don't want to see us lose out on what could be a bit of a talent...
radlettman
says...
10:28pm Mon 25 Jun 12
Some of his team mates should also be careful what they post on Twiter.... or read on here just what WFC supporters think of TD now. Good riddance. So much for the nice family man image. Too much ... too quick and not worth it.
Roy Stockdill
says...
11:18pm Mon 25 Jun 12
radlettman wrote:I have just looked at a few of Troy Deeney's Twitter posts. Here's a classic.....
His Mr "Nice guy" try hard for WFC image is now bust. Just look at his twitter account and comments last night about Terry / Cole / Young. Not a nice guy.... plenty of time for him to reflect in prison...
Some of his team mates should also be careful what they post on Twiter.... or read on here just what WFC supporters think of TD now. Good riddance. So much for the nice family man image. Too much ... too quick and not worth it.
"Some kid out side my house just sed are you troy deeney and my son goes no he's my dad stupid lol"
Now do people understand why I regard Twitter as perhaps the most appalling and moronic development in the entire history of the English language? It enables thick, uneducated, illiterate cretins to express themselves in language that is little better than that of a caveman thousands of years ago. One wonders if we are reverting to what our ancestors must have been like at the dawn of pre-history if this is the kind of thing the Internet was invented for?
Deeney is clearly a very nasty yob and deserves everything he has got. Footballers are not above the law. I hope it will signal the end of his career, but the world is now so cynical, and football in particular, that I suspect it may not.
Hornet Cornet
says...
11:51pm Mon 25 Jun 12
Harrydownunder
says...
1:24am Tue 26 Jun 12
You can reflect on your wrong doings while trying to avoid Mr Big!
Sad thing is, he will probably be out in a couple of months.....
COGGDAVE1
says...
7:33am Tue 26 Jun 12
Yeah he acted like a thug, and his crime is inexcusable, thats why he is in nick, but read the posts on here, you want to punish him again and again...
Certain morons on here offer fights to anyone who dares to disagree with them all the time... Bucks..bancrupt etc ...let him serve his dues and get off his back ..he has enough to put up with without you lot acting like idiots ...
BarryTheHornet
says...
7:51am Tue 26 Jun 12
COGGDAVE1 wrote:If you mean have I kicked a man in the head as if it was a football when he was barely conscious and unable to defend himself then...no, can't say I have Dave. He could have killed the bloke. This was a bit more than a punch-up. I take your point about prison being a punishment but there's a wider moral issue at stake here and his behaviour, (regardless of his custodial sentence where he might learn the error of his ways), is not acceptable. If he's inside then he can't honour his contract can he. I'm afraid you're in the minority on this one Dave. The right thing is for Watford to terminate his contract immediately.
Whats the matter with you lot !!!! His punishment is 10 months inside...have none of you never made a mistake, have none of you ever had a 'punch up' ??
Yeah he acted like a thug, and his crime is inexcusable, thats why he is in nick, but read the posts on here, you want to punish him again and again...
Certain morons on here offer fights to anyone who dares to disagree with them all the time... Bucks..bancrupt etc ...let him serve his dues and get off his back ..he has enough to put up with without you lot acting like idiots ...
COGGDAVE1
says...
8:12am Tue 26 Jun 12
BarryTheHornet wrote:Yes Barry, I understand your point, and good post with a good argument against my view, but how many time can you hang a guy ?? I just think his punishment should not go on and on..we will have to agree to disagree on this one ...
COGGDAVE1 wrote:If you mean have I kicked a man in the head as if it was a football when he was barely conscious and unable to defend himself then...no, can't say I have Dave. He could have killed the bloke. This was a bit more than a punch-up. I take your point about prison being a punishment but there's a wider moral issue at stake here and his behaviour, (regardless of his custodial sentence where he might learn the error of his ways), is not acceptable. If he's inside then he can't honour his contract can he. I'm afraid you're in the minority on this one Dave. The right thing is for Watford to terminate his contract immediately.
Whats the matter with you lot !!!! His punishment is 10 months inside...have none of you never made a mistake, have none of you ever had a 'punch up' ??
Yeah he acted like a thug, and his crime is inexcusable, thats why he is in nick, but read the posts on here, you want to punish him again and again...
Certain morons on here offer fights to anyone who dares to disagree with them all the time... Bucks..bancrupt etc ...let him serve his dues and get off his back ..he has enough to put up with without you lot acting like idiots ...
Ronny oh Ronny Ronny
says...
8:50am Tue 26 Jun 12
COGGDAVE1
says...
9:13am Tue 26 Jun 12
Ronny oh Ronny Ronny wrote:Absolutely ...100% ..RIGHT
He will be out in 5 months that is certain, he will be back with us in November, he will have served his punishment, why should he lose his job. Prisons are full of reoffending career criminals that can't do anything else and the country is in a state because of it. He has made one mistake (and yes a massive one and you have to feel desperately sorry for the victim) but he can't be punished for the rest of his life. The fact he will be away from his son and mrs I would wager that he would not do anything like this again
The Jamie Hand Stand
says...
9:15am Tue 26 Jun 12
4boys
says...
9:18am Tue 26 Jun 12
This isnt just a brawl, hes kicked someone defenseless on the ground, breaking their jaw, what a sicko.
We have a family image to think of, and our academy kids need senior players to look up to, hes hardly a role modell
corbindallas
says...
9:26am Tue 26 Jun 12
IntelligentHornet
says...
9:52am Tue 26 Jun 12
Hornet77
says...
9:53am Tue 26 Jun 12
"The fact he will be away from his son and mrs I would wager that he would not do anything like this again” Didn't work with Marlon King, Jemain Pennant and Lee Hughes, none of whom have turned their lives around after getting into trouble with the law.
hornets66
says...
10:18am Tue 26 Jun 12
Reg Edit
says...
10:24am Tue 26 Jun 12
This wasn't a fight. A fight has two or more conscious people fighting. This was a professional footballer who should know a little about kicking, kicking another human being who was barely conscious if at all.
Cowardly and stupid, there was no danger from the man on the ground yet he still kicked him. Gratuitous violence, no excuses.
I would not pay a single penny to watch a team that had him in it, and I will not go to watch Watford until such time as he is no longer on the books.
Yes he will go to prison for punishment, so should he be punished twice by being sacked?
Simple answer - Yes.
G_Whiz
says...
10:26am Tue 26 Jun 12
Surely that's a racist attack?
or maybe student-phobic!
I also like the way a red mist is used for any kind of defence.
Either way, he doesn't deserve to pull on the Golden Shirt ever again!
tonupchris
says...
10:26am Tue 26 Jun 12
Hornet77 wrote:These three were given a second chance though and in my opinion we should do the same thing with Deeney. Although they re offended it doesn't mean he will as well but obviously if he did then that would be the end. I would say however that the fact he's admitted his guilt I imagine is purely down to the fact he was shown the cctv footage which didn't leave him a leg to stand on.
Ronny oh Ronny Ronny says...
"The fact he will be away from his son and mrs I would wager that he would not do anything like this again” Didn't work with Marlon King, Jemain Pennant and Lee Hughes, none of whom have turned their lives around after getting into trouble with the law.
I would hope being away from his children would make him think that this is something he will never do again.
Remember this is only my opinion and I have also been attacked by a large group of individuals and spent some time in hospital as a result so I do know how those attacked feel.
Hornet77
says...
10:32am Tue 26 Jun 12
mark_123
says...
10:33am Tue 26 Jun 12
Mickey Quinn, not so thin
says...
10:34am Tue 26 Jun 12
hornets66 wrote:I'm not comfortable either but, we sack him, he joins another championship team for nothing, scores 15-20 goals next season including against us, are you sure you would be happy ? Bottom line is wfc is a business and he will be out in the Autumn. As others have said we have previously signed players who have had brushes with the law and even been inside. Where do you draw the line ? An obligation to sack if it's your employee but free to pick them on a free transfer if its not ?? It was a moment of madness, he pleaded guilty, he will have served a prison sentence, so why would we then gift him to one of our competitors ? Someone above said we must sack him but hoped someone else would take him up otherwise he has been punished twice. What sort of logic is that ??
How many of you guys can honestly say your comfortable in cheering this guy on in a yellow shirt. I cant say Im comfortable with that
hornets66
says...
10:55am Tue 26 Jun 12
Mickey Quinn, not so thin
says...
11:03am Tue 26 Jun 12
Hornet77 wrote:No but with respect they probably didn't pay £500k ish for your services and can replace you at minimal cost ? What if we had just spent £5m for him and he had 3 yrs of a contract to run would we still give him f.o.c to an opponent? Bottom line is it was a moment of madness, he pleaded guilty, he will have served a prison sentence. Unless you are saying he should ever be allowed to play professional football again, why would you sack him ?
Surely being sent to prison goes hand in hand with losing your job? I'm pretty sure if I got sent down my employers wouldn't keep my role open for me when I get out.
MJ1
says...
11:13am Tue 26 Jun 12
Dr Johnny Fever
says...
11:16am Tue 26 Jun 12
Hornet77 wrote:Yes, mine too, I'd be out the door as soon as I told them.
Surely being sent to prison goes hand in hand with losing your job? I'm pretty sure if I got sent down my employers wouldn't keep my role open for me when I get out.
luther blissett
says...
11:17am Tue 26 Jun 12
I don't even think he is that good. Yes I cheered him last season for his effort and eventually some goals, but he has been here for 2 seasons now and has only shown good form for half a season. Reminds me of Priskin because of that and where is he now?
Just like the SPL clubs not letting Rangers back in, principals should stand firm.
PurpleRalph
says...
11:34am Tue 26 Jun 12
luther blissett wrote:Ha Ha great first line and agree 100% with the rest. He's at best average and will be dumped in the nearest has-bin as soon as the italians take control.
I heard he missed the blokes head a number of times. Sounds like the Troy we know.
I don't even think he is that good. Yes I cheered him last season for his effort and eventually some goals, but he has been here for 2 seasons now and has only shown good form for half a season. Reminds me of Priskin because of that and where is he now?
Just like the SPL clubs not letting Rangers back in, principals should stand firm.
northofwatfordpete
says...
11:44am Tue 26 Jun 12
I don't want him in my team.
Chris the Vic
says...
12:03pm Tue 26 Jun 12
Those who want to keep him should reflect on the clubs image. As with Chelsea in the past we should sue him for breach of contract and ensure he has to sacrifice salary for a golden hello so that the brave lad can pay us.
As for Pete saying he doesnt want him in his team, I dont want deeney in the County.
Pray we get a super Mario to replace him
TRT
says...
12:16pm Tue 26 Jun 12
honest-view
says...
2:15pm Tue 26 Jun 12
I already know the answer to that,it is only words.
But young people do read.
TRT
says...
2:21pm Tue 26 Jun 12
I've lost the thread of where I was headed...
Anyway, the difference between fans and the players is that players are held to contract. Besides, fans that do get involved in fighting should and do get kicked out of the stands and told not to return! Possibly not as often as one would like to see.
garston tony
says...
2:28pm Tue 26 Jun 12
Yes we all make mistakes and yes I agree people should be given a second chance. But there are mistakes and there are mistakes and with mistakes often comes consequences in this case a prison term and being sacked. We dont need people of that character at the club (on the pitch or in the stands) and his second chance can come at another club.
Cant remember his name at the moment but Chelsea sacked a player a few years ago for drug taking and getting banned. Once he served his ban he signed for an Italian club and Chelsea successfully sued the player for financial lossess. Several million pounds. I would assume that WFC could do something similar, sack him and sue for his transfer fee?
Also the club probably arent making a decision due to the pending sale, current set up will rightly want to leave this up to new owners for when they finally take over. New owners wont want to make a statement about a player at a club they still dont actually own
corbindallas
says...
5:01pm Tue 26 Jun 12
Mickey Quinn, not so thin wrote:Think you are getting this twisted, I said he needs to be sacked for breach of contract due to being charged and imprisoned, and that another club should give him a chance after he has served his time otherwise it would be unfair to keep penalising him. The fact he breached his contract with Watford means it is us who should not be giving him a second chance especially as it was a serious charge and not a minor charge whereby a final warning would be surfice, 'gross misconduct' is the classification for this!
hornets66 wrote:I'm not comfortable either but, we sack him, he joins another championship team for nothing, scores 15-20 goals next season including against us, are you sure you would be happy ? Bottom line is wfc is a business and he will be out in the Autumn. As others have said we have previously signed players who have had brushes with the law and even been inside. Where do you draw the line ? An obligation to sack if it's your employee but free to pick them on a free transfer if its not ?? It was a moment of madness, he pleaded guilty, he will have served a prison sentence, so why would we then gift him to one of our competitors ? Someone above said we must sack him but hoped someone else would take him up otherwise he has been punished twice. What sort of logic is that ??
How many of you guys can honestly say your comfortable in cheering this guy on in a yellow shirt. I cant say Im comfortable with that
AFHWFC
says...
8:51pm Tue 26 Jun 12
gloryhornet4
says...
9:23pm Tue 26 Jun 12
There may be a FL rule (?) as is for the Prem League that 30 days notice is required to the player to terminate a contract and you do not give that notice through the club website etc. Mess up a sacking costs a lot of money of course.
TD kept the club informed at each stage we are told. If TD was due back today for training - breach of contract - non attendance at work perhaps after a short period? If they do not dismiss there is an obligation to pay wages, so we will know soon enough.
It seems TD was not expecting to be sent down and I think he made a conscious decision to work his socks off since Feb to save his job - out on his feet at the end of some games.
What will be, will be.
Hornet Cornet
says...
11:29am Wed 27 Jun 12
Hornet Cornet
says...
11:30am Wed 27 Jun 12
gloryhornet4
says...
1:32pm Wed 27 Jun 12
Hornet Cornet wrote:Dismissal has to be handled properly - investigate, decide and then notify outcome and provide appeal route. The club may have done so for all we know - but telling the media before the individual gets the letter would be wrong. Hence club saying a statement later. I agree TD has an uphill challenge to play for WFC again.
there cannot be any discussion on that thug's future at watford . sack him now. he is a disgrace to human kind.
corbindallas
says...
3:40pm Wed 27 Jun 12
gloryhornet4 wrote:Not for gross misconduct his criminal conviction overrides a need to investigate,they need to notify him and as he is unavailable an appeal will not be available or possible and frankly because of the offence is not needed either.
Hornet Cornet wrote:Dismissal has to be handled properly - investigate, decide and then notify outcome and provide appeal route. The club may have done so for all we know - but telling the media before the individual gets the letter would be wrong. Hence club saying a statement later. I agree TD has an uphill challenge to play for WFC again.
there cannot be any discussion on that thug's future at watford . sack him now. he is a disgrace to human kind.
buckshornet
says...
9:30pm Sat 30 Jun 12
WFC4ever says...
5:34pm Mon 25 Jun 12