In his diatribe against Ken Livingstone in your 'Times Soapbox' (Times Group, December 6), GLA member Brian Coleman gives the impression that the Tory record on London government was whiter than white. Many on the left, including Ken himself, were not happy about having a mayor for London, for it is felt to be wrong to put so much executive power in the hands of one person.
Ken accepted nomination as an independent candidate because it was clear that New Labour's favourite, Frank Dobson was too flamboyant.
The original Tory choice was Jeffrey Archer, who was dropped when his perjury in a libel trial came to light.
But although of somewhat dubious character, Archer's nomination did not raise a squeak of protest from Brian Coleman. Indeed, Tory legislation on the government of London was a tremendous exercise in gerrymandering.
The Greater London Council tended to be controlled by Labour, so the Tories abolished it. They even opposed the Labour government's creation of the GLA. So here we have an additional paradox. Ken opposed having a London mayor, but now is, while the Tories, including Coleman, opposed the setting up of the GLA, and is now on it. We live in strange times!
Ron Isaacs
Sebright Road, Barnet
December 12, 2001 18:01
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article